Skip to main content

A Generic Platform for Ontological Query Answering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

The paper presents ALASKA, a multi-layered platform enabling to perform ontological conjunctive query answering (OCQA) over heterogeneously-stored knowledge bases in a generic, logic-based manner. While this problem knows today a renewed interest in knowledge-based systems with the semantic equivalence of different languages widely studied, from a practical view point this equivalence has been not made explicit. Moreover, the emergence of graph database provides competitive storage methods not yet addressed by existing literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Abiteboul, R. Hull, and V. Vianu. Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Baader, S. Brandt, and C. Lutz. Pushing the el envelope. In Proc. of IJCAI 2005, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.-F. Baget, M. Croitoru, A. Gutierrez, M. Lecl`ere, and M.-L. Mugnier. Translations between rdf(s) and conceptual graphs. In ICCS, pages 28–41, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.-F. Baget, M.-L. Mugnier, S. Rudolph, and M. Thomazo. Walking the complexity lines for generalized guarded existential rules. In T. Walsh, editor, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 712–717. IJCAI / AAAI, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Basca and A. Bernstein. Avalanche: Putting the spirit of the web back into semantic webquerying. In ISWC Posters&Demos, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Cal`ı, G. Gottlob, and T. Lukasiewicz. A general datalog-based framework for tractable query answering over ontologies. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eigth ACM SIGMODSIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pages 77–86. ACM, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Cal`ı, G. Gottlob, T. Lukasiewicz, B. Marnette, and A. Pieris. Datalog+/-: A family of logical knowledge representation and query languages for new applications. In LICS, pages 228–242, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati. Tractable reasoning and efficient query answering in description logics: The dl-lite family. J. Autom. Reasoning, 39(3):385–429, 2007.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Chein and M.-L. Mugnier. Graph-based Knowledge Representation and ReasoningComputational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Croitoru and E. Compatangelo. A tree decomposition algorithm for conceptual graph projection. In Tenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 271–276. AAAI Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Croitoru, L. Guizol, and M. Lecl`ere. On link validity in bibliographic knowledge bases. In Proc. of IPMU, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Haslhofer, E.M. Roochi, B. Schandl, and S. Zander. Europeana RDF store report. Technicalreport, University of Vienna, Vienna, Mar. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Hayes, editor. RDF Semantics. W3C Recommendation. W3C, 2004.http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/.

  14. A. Hertel, J. Broekstra, and H. Stuckenschmidt. Rdf storage and retrieval systems. Handbook on Ontologies, pages 489–508, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Lenzerini. Data integration: A theoretical perspective. In Proc. of PODS 2002, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Schmidt, T. Hornung, G. Lausen, and C. Pinkel. Sp2bench: A sparql performance benchmark.CoRR,abs/0806.4627, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Sensoy, G. de Mel,W.W. Vasconcelos, and T. J. Norman. Ontological logic programming. In WIMS, page44, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Paiva Lima da Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

da Silva, B.P.L., Baget, JF., Croitoru, M. (2012). A Generic Platform for Ontological Query Answering. In: Bramer, M., Petridis, M. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXIX. SGAI 2012. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4739-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4739-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4738-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4739-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics