Threshold-Type Control of Supply Chain Systems with Backordering Decisions

  • Dong-Ping SongEmail author
Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)


This chapter develops and evaluates threshold-type control policies for the supply chains with backordering decisions presented in  Chap. 4. For the joint raw material ordering, production, and backordering control problem, a linear switching threshold policy is presented to approximate the optimal policy. Its effectiveness is examined through numerical examples. For the failure-prone manufacturing supply chain without raw material ordering activity, the analytical results of the discounted cost case are extended to the long-run average cost case, for example, the optimality of a three-parameter threshold control policy. More importantly, the explicit form of the stationary distribution under such threshold policy is derived, which is then used to calculate steady-state performance measures and seek the optimal threshold values. An interesting finding is that the completely backordering policy may be optimal for the discounted cost case but will never be optimal for the average cost case.


  1. Akella, R., Kumar, P.R.: Optimal control of production rate in a failure prone manufacturing system. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 31(1), 116–126 (1986)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjaafar, S., ElHafsi, M., Huang, T.: Optimal control of a production-inventory system with both backorders and lost sales. Nav. Res. Logist. 57(3), 252–265 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bielecki, T., Kumar, P.R.: Optimality of zero-inventory policies for unreliable manufacturing systems. Oper. Res. 36(4), 532–541 (1988)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carr, S., Duenyas, I. Optimal admission control and sequencing in a make-to-stock/make-to-order production system. Oper. Res. 48(5), 709–720 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feng, Y.Y., Xiao, B.C.: Optimal threshold control in discrete failure-prone manufacturing systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 47(7), 1167–1174 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feng, Y.Y., Yan, H.M.: Optimal production control in a discrete manufacturing system with unreliable machines and random demands. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 45(12), 2280–2296 (2000)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hu, J.Q.: Production rate control for failure-prone production systems with no-backlog permitted. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 40(2), 291–295 (1995)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Iravani, S.M.R., Liu, T., Simchi-Levi, D.: Optimal production and admission policies in make-to-stock/make-to-order manufacturing systems. Prod. Oper. Manage. 21(2), 224–235 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Isotupa, K.P.S.: An Markovian inventory system with lost sales and two demand classes. Math. Comput. Model. 43(7–8), 687–694 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Khmelnitsky, E., Presman, E., Sethi, S.P.: Optimal production control of a failure-prone machine. Ann. Oper. Res. 182(1), 67–86 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martinelli, F., Valigi, P.: Hedging point policies remain optimal under limited backlog and inventory space. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49(10), 1863–1869 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mollering, K.T., Thonemann, U.W.: An optimal critical level policy for inventory systems with two demand classes. Nav. Res. Logist. 55(7), 632–642 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sennott, L.I.: Stochastic Dynamic Programming and the Control of Queueing Systems. Wiley, New York (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Song, D.P.: Optimal production and backordering policy in failure-prone manufacturing systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 51(5), 906–911 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Song, D.P., Sun, Y.X.: Optimal service control of a serial production line with unreliable workstations and random demand. Automatica 34(9), 1047–1060 (1998)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Song, D.P., Sun, Y.X.: Optimal control structure of an unreliable manufacturing system with random demands. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 44(3), 619–622 (1999)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of PlymouthPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations