Advertisement

Parallelization of Equation Solvers

  • C. V. Nielsen
  • W. Zhang
  • L. M. Alves
  • N. Bay
  • P. A. F. Martins
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

When solving large finite element problems, solution time becomes a factor which cannot be ignored. It is among the concerns when considering modeling in three dimensions instead of two dimensions. Different approaches are available to reduce the computational cost.

Keywords

Solution Time Iterative Solver Direct Solver Electrode Force Parallel Fraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    El-Sayed MEM, Hsiung C-K (1990) Parallel finite element computation with separate substructures. Comput Struct 36(2):261–265Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farhat C (1988) A simple and efficient automatic fem domain decomposer. Comput Struct 28(5):579–602Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-Nasra M, Nguyen DT (1992) An algorithm for domain decomposition in finite element analysis. Comput Struct 39(3/4):277–289Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lanczos C (1952) Solution of systems of linear equations by minimized iterations. J Res Nat Bur Stand 49(1):33–53Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hestenes MR, Stiefel E (1952) Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems. J Res Nat Bur Stand 49(6):409–436Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meijerink JA, van der Vorst HA (1977) An iterative solution method for linear systems of which the coefficient matrix is a symmetric m-matrix. Math Comput 31(137):148–162Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Farhat C, Wilson E (1987) A parallel active column equation solver. Comput Struct 28(2):289–304Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nielsen CV, Martins PAF (2013) Parallel skyline solver: implementation for shared memory on standard personal computers. Submitted for publication in International JournalGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Synn SY, Fulton RE (1995) The performance prediction of a parallel skyline solver and its implementation for large scale structure analysis. Comput Syst Eng 6(3):275–284Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fernandes JLM, Martins PAF (2009) Robust and effective numerical strategies for the simulation of metal forming processes. J Manuf Technol Res 1(1/2):21–36Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amdahl GM (1967) Validity of the single processor approach to achieving large scale computing capabilities. In: AFIPS Joint Computer Conferences, pp 483–485Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. V. Nielsen
    • 1
  • W. Zhang
    • 2
  • L. M. Alves
    • 3
  • N. Bay
    • 1
  • P. A. F. Martins
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTechnical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
  2. 2.SWANTEC Software and Engineering ApSKongens LyngbyDenmark
  3. 3.Instituto Superior Técnico, IDMECTechnical University of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations