Advertisement

Cost and Benefits of Denser Topologies for the Smart Grid

  • Giuliano Andrea Pagani
  • Marco Aiello
Conference paper

Abstract

The Smart Grid promises to reshape how electricity is generated, distributed, and used. More delocalized generation based on renewable sources will transform end-users into prosumers (producers and consumers) of energy. These will require electric and supporting ICT infrastructures to be able to openly access the energy market. In this paper, we focus on the electric infrastructure issue related to the Smart Grid topic. We consider network models from the literature of Complex Network Analysis and evaluate their ability to be used for the Distribution Grid to reduce the cost of electricity distribution based on topological property. Our initial conclusion is that denser topologies are helpful to reach the goal. However, the cost of realizing such topologies in terms of cabling is not negligible, as we show.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work is supported by the EU FP7 Project GreenerBuildings, contract no. 258888 and by the Dutch National Research Council, contract no. 647.000.004. Pagani is supported by University of Groningen with the Ubbo Emmius Fellowship 2009.

References

  1. 1.
    Albert, R., Albert, I., Nakarado, G.L.: Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid. Phys. Rev. E 69(2), 025103 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barabási, A.L.: Linked: the new science of networks. Am. J. Phys. 71(4), 409–410 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chassin, D.P., Posse, C.: Evaluating North American electric grid reliability using the Barabási Albert network model. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 355, 667–677 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crucitti, P., Latora, V., Marchiori, M.: A topological analysis of the Italian electric power grid. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 338(1–2), 92–97 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dorogovtsev, S.N., Mendes, J.F.F.: Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW. Oxford University Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erdős, P., Rényi, A.: On random graphs I. Publ. Math. Debrecen 6, 290–297 (1959)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garver, L.: Transmission network estimation using linear programming. IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst. PAS-89(7), 1688–1697 (1970)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grigsby, L.L. (ed.): The Electric Power Engineering Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holmgren, A.J.: Using graph models to analyze the vulnerability of electric networks. Risk Anal. 26(4), 955–969 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Joskow, P.L.: Lessons learned from electricity market liberalization. Energy J. 29(Special I), 9–42 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liben-Nowell, D., Kleinberg, J.: The link-prediction problem for social networks. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 58(7), 1019–1031 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lovins, A.B., Datta, E.K., Feiler, T., Rabago, K.R., Swisher, J.N., Lehmann, A., Wicker, K.: Small is Profitable: The Hidden Economic Benefits of Making Electrical Resources the Right Size. Rocky Mountain Institute, Snowmass (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    National Grid: Undergrounding high voltage electricity transmission—the technical issues. Technical Report, National Grid (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pagani, G.A., Aiello, M.: The power grid as a complex network: a survey. Technical Report, JBI, University of Groningen. arXiv:1105.3338 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pagani, G.A., Aiello, M.: Towards decentralization: a topological investigation of the medium and low voltage grids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2(3), 538–547 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pagani, G.A., Aiello, M.: Power grid network evolutions for local energy trading. Technical Report, JBI, University of Groningen. arXiv:1201.0962 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosato, V., Bologna, S., Tiriticco, F.: Topological properties of high-voltage electrical transmission networks. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 77(2), 99–105 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vázquez, A., Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A.: Large-scale topological and dynamical properties of the Internet. Phys. Rev. E 65(6), 1–12 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, Z., Scaglione, A., Thomas, R.J.: Generating statistically correct random topologies for testing smart grid communication and networks. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 1(1), 28–39 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Johann Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations