Evaluation of the Accuracy of an Accelerometer Response Generated by Axial Impact Loading

Conference paper

Abstract

The basic objective in the present study is to show that for the most common configuration of an impactor system, an accelerometer cannot exactly reproduce the dynamic response of a specimen subject to impact loading. Assessment of the accelerometer mounted in a drop-weight impactor setup for an axially loaded specimen is done with the aid of an equivalent lumped parameter model (LPM) of the setup. A steel hat-type specimen under the impact loading is represented as a non-linear spring of varying stiffness, while the accelerometer is assumed to behave in a linear manner due to its high stiffness. A suitable numerical approach has been used to solve the non-linear governing equations for a 3 degrees-of-freedom system in a piece-wise linear manner. The numerical solution following an explicit time integration scheme is used to yield an excellent reproduction of the mechanical behavior of the specimen thereby confirming the accuracy of the numerical approach. The spring representing the accelerometer, however, predicts a response that qualitatively matches the assumed load–displacement response of the test specimen with a perceptibly lower magnitude of load.

Keywords

Perforation Coupler 

References

  1. 1.
    Khazan AD (1994) Transducers and their elements: design and applications, 1st edn. Prentice Hall, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lynch JP, Partridge A, Law KH (2003) Design of piezoresistive MEMS-based accelerometer for integration with wireless sensing unit for structural monitoring. J Aerosp Eng. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321 (16)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Partridge A, Reynolds JK, Chui BW (2000) A high-performance planar piezoresistive accelerometer. J Microelectromech Sys. doi: 10.1109/84.825778 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dytran Instruments Inc, Dytran tech education, accelerometer mounting considerationsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Endevco data sheet for model 7264B piezoresistive accelerometer, Meggitt sensing systems, EndevcoGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choi KK, Kim Nam-ho (2004) Structural sensitivity analysis and optimization 1: linear systems. Springer, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cristalli C, Paone N, Rodríguez RM (2006) Mechanical fault detection of electric motors by laser vibrometer and accelerometer measurements. J Mech Syst Sig Proc. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.11.013 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tran Duc Tan, Nguyen Tien Anh (2011) Three-axis piezoresistive accelerometer with uniform axial sensitivities. In: International conference on intelligent systems, modeling and simulation ISMS2011, Cambodia, pp 395–399Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Product Design and ManufacturingIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations