Advertisement

Renewable Energy and CO2: Current Status and Costs

  • Ricardo Guerrero-Lemus
  • José Manuel Martínez-Duart
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Energy book series (LNEN, volume 3)

Abstract

In this chapter, it is exposed a brief description of the current use and theoretical potential of renewable and conventional energies, the evolution of the CO2 emissions and atmospheric concentration and their influence in the climate change, fuel and electricity generation costs of renewable energy technologies, the technological development status and the environmental impacts of the renewable energy technologies. Significant figures and how they have evolved in recent decades are included, and also estimation of conventional fuel reserves and leading countries in terms of renewable energy penetration.

Keywords

Renewable Energy Technology Renewable Energy Resource Conventional Energy Renewable Technology Energy Information Administration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    IEA (2012) Statistics DatabaseGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nitsch F (2007) Technologische und energiewirtschaftliche Perspektiven erneuerbarer Energien. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    PennWell Corporation, Oil & Gas Journal, Vol. 106.48 (December 22, 2008), except United States. Oil includes crude oil and condensate. Data for the United States are from the Energy Information Administration, U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Reserves, 2007 Annual Report, DOE/EIA-0216(2007) (February 2009). Oil and Gas Journal’s oil reserve estimate for Canada includes 5.392 billion barrels of conventional crude oil and condensate reserves and 172.7 billion barrels of oil sands reservesGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Coal InstituteGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    World Nuclear AssociationGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Energy Information Administration. US Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    IEA (2011) Key World Energy Statistics 2011Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    EHA (2008) Hydrogen and fuel cells as strong partners for renewable energy systems. European Hydrogen AssociationGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    IEA (2009) World Energy Outlook 2009Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The Economist (2009) The IEA puts a date on peak oil production. The Economist (10 December 2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kerr RA (2011) Peak oil production may already be here. Science 331:1510–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heinberg R, Fridley D (2010) The end of cheap coal. Nature 468:367–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    The Economist (2010) The clouds of unknowing. The Economist (18 March 2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pan Y et al (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333:988–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Earth System Research Laboratory. Global Monitoring Division. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. U.S. Department of CommerceGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    IPCC (2008) Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 (AR4)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Met Office Hadley Centre. UK GovernmentGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    European Climate Exchange EUA Daily FuturesGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lobell DB, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J (2011) Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333:616–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lobell DB et al (2011) Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials. Nature Climate Change 1:42–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barriopedro D et al (2011) The hot summer of 2010: redrawing the temperature record map of europe. Science 332:220–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shiermeier Q et al (2011) Extreme measures. Nature 477:148–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hsiang SM, Meng KC, Cane MA (2011) Civil conflicts are associated with the global climate. Nature 476:438–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    The Economist (2009) Good policy and bad. Especial report on climate change and the carbon economy. The Economist (3 December 2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    CME Group. Natural gas (Henry Hub) futuresGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    BCG (2011) Evolución Tecnológica y Prospectiva de Costes de las Energías Renovables. Estudio Técnico PER 2011–2020. Boston Consulting GroupGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    CME Group. Denatured fuel ethanolGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    CME Group. RBOB GasolineGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    CME Group. Argus BiodieselGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    CME Group. European Gasoil Bullet SWAPGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    IEA (2008). Energy technology perspectives 2008Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Electricity Storage AssociationGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Skytte K et al (2004) Støtte til Vedvarende Energi? (Support for Renewable Energy?). Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Krewitt W (2009) External costs of energy technologies. New energy externalities developments for sustainability. Brussels, 16–17 February 2009Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    McLinden C (2012) Oil-sand pollution quantified. Research highlights. Nature 483:126Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cho A (2010) Energy’s tricky tradeoffs. Science 329:786–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mulder K, Hagens N, Fisher B (2010) Burning water: a comparative analysis of the energy return on water investment. AMBIO 39:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kerr RA (2010) Do we have the energy for the next transition? Science 329:780–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fthenakis V, Alsema E (2006) Photovoltaics energy payback times, greenhouse gas emissions and external costs: 2004–early 2005 status. Prog Photovolt 14:275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    WEC (2005) Comparison of energy systems using lifecycle assessment. World Energy CouncilGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gagnon L et al (2002) Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation options: The status of research in year 2001. Energy Policy 30:1267–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rafaschieri A, et al. (2001) Poplar gasified for electricity production. National Renewable Energy LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    ExternE-Pol (2004) Extension of accounting framework and policy applications. European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Preiss P, Blesl M (2009) External costs of energy technologies. New energy externalities development for sustainability brussels, 16–17 February 2009Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo Guerrero-Lemus
    • 1
  • José Manuel Martínez-Duart
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. Física BásicaUniversidad La LagunaLa LagunaSpain
  2. 2.Dept. Física AplicadaUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations