Skip to main content

Strategies in Surgical Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Heart Failure
  • 990 Accesses

Abstract

Heart failure is not a disease but a complex clinical syndrome representing the end-stage of a number of different cardiac diseases. It can result from any structural or functional cardiac disorder that impairs the ability of the ventricle to fill with or eject blood. It has been defined as a reduction in cardiac function such that cardiac output is reduced relative to the metabolic demands of the body and is associated with failure of compensating mechanisms.

The heart…moves of itself and does not stop unless forever. – Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mills RM, Young JB. Practical approaches to the treatment of heart failure. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carson PE. Beta blocker treatment in heart failure. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1999;41(4):301–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeltsman D, Acker MA. Surgical management of heart failure: an overview. Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:383–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenfield LJ, Mulholland MW. Surgery: scientific principles and practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bortman G, Sellanes M, Odell DS, Ring WS, Olivari MT. Discrepancy between pre- and post-transplant diagnosis of end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74(9):921–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marwick TH. The viable myocardium: epidemiology, detection, and clinical implications. Lancet. 1998;351(9105):815–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allman KC, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Udelson JE. Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(7):1151–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baldasseroni S, Opasich C, Gorini M, et al. Left bundle-branch block is associated with increased 1-year sudden and total mortality rate in 5517 outpatients with congestive heart failure: a report from the Italian network on congestive heart failure. Am Heart J. 2002;143(3):398–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koelling TM, Aaronson KD, Cody RJ, Bach DS, Armstrong WF. Prognostic significance of mitral regurgitation and tricuspid regurgitation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Am Heart J. 2002;144(3):524–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Amabile CM, Spencer AP. Keeping your patient with heart failure safe: a review of potentially dangerous medications. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(7):709–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(7):2101–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Davie AP, Francis CM, Caruana L, Sutherland GR, McMurray JJ. Assessing diagnosis in heart failure: which features are any use? QJM. 1997;90(5):335–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morgan S, Smith H, Simpson I, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of left ventricular dysfunction among elderly patients in general practice setting: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 1999;318(7180):368–72.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gillespie ND, McNeill G, Pringle T, Ogston S, Struthers AD, Pringle SD. Cross sectional study of contribution of clinical assessment and simple cardiac investigations to diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients admitted with acute dyspnoea. BMJ. 1997;314(7085):936–40.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Badgett RG, Mulrow CD, Otto PM, Ramirez G. How well can the chest radiograph diagnose left ventricular dysfunction? J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11(10):625–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Knudsen CW, Omland T, Clopton P, et al. Diagnostic value of B-Type natriuretic peptide and chest radiographic findings in patients with acute dyspnea. Am J Med. 2004;116(6):363–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davie AP, Francis CM, Love MP, et al. Value of the electrocardiogram in identifying heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. BMJ. 1996;312(7025):222.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Erbel R, Schweizer P, Krebs W, Meyer J, Effert S. Sensitivity and specificity of two-dimensional echocardiography in detection of impaired left ventricular function. Eur Heart J. 1984;5(6):477–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vigna C, Russo A, De Rito V, et al. Regional wall motion analysis by dobutamine stess echocardiography to distinguish between ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 1996;131(3):537–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Naqvi TZ, Goel RK, Forrester JS, Siegel RJ. Myocardial contractile reserve on dobutamine echocardiography predicts late spontaneous improvement in cardiac function in patients with recent onset idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(5):1537–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Naqvi TZ, Goel RK, Forrester JS, Davidson RM, Siegel RJ. Usefulness of left ventricular mass in predicting recovery of left ventricular systolic function in patients with symptomatic idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85(5):624–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Felker GM, Thompson RE, Hare JM, et al. Underlying causes and long-term survival in patients with initially unexplained cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(15):1077–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 1999;99(17):2345–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Starling RC, Van Fossen DB, Hammer DF, Unverferth DV. Morbidity of endomyocardial biopsy in cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68(1):133–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mason JW. Endomyocardial biopsy and the causes of dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(3):591–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cohn JN. Structural basis for heart failure. Ventricular remodeling and its pharmacological inhibition. Circulation. 1995;91(10):2504–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee KS, Marwick TH, Cook SA, et al. Prognosis of patients with left ventricular dysfunction, with and without viable myocardium after myocardial infarction. Relative efficacy of medical therapy and revascularization. Circulation. 1994;90(6):2687–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gioia G, Powers J, Heo J, Iskandrian AS. Prognostic value of rest-redistribution tomographic thallium-201 imaging in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75(12):759–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pagley PR, Beller GA, Watson DD, Gimple LW, Ragosta M. Improved outcome after coronary bypass surgery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and residual myocardial viability. Circulation. 1997;96(3):793–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Baer FM, Theissen P, Schneider CA, et al. Dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging predicts contractile recovery of chronically dysfunctional myocardium after successful revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31(5):1040–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wellnhofer E, Olariu A, Klein C, et al. Magnetic resonance low-dose dobutamine test is superior to SCAR quantification for the prediction of functional recovery. Circulation. 2004;109(18):2172–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bax JJ, Poldermans D, Elhendy A, et al. Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction, heart failure symptoms and prognosis after revascularization in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and viable myocardium detected by dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(1):163–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(10):669–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. The Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study Investigators. Lancet 1993;342(8875):821–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C, Carlsen JE, et al. A clinical trial of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor trandolapril in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation (TRACE) Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(25):1670–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. A randomized trial of beta-blockade in heart failure. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS). CIBIS Investigators and Committees. Circulation. 1994;90(4):1765–73.

    Google Scholar 

  37. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;353(9146):9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet. 1999;353(9169):2001–7.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, et al. The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. U.S. Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(21):1349–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yancy CW, Fowler MB, Colucci WS, et al. Race and the response to adrenergic blockade with carvedilol in patients with chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(18):1358–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Aikawa Y, Rohde L, Plehn J, et al. Regional wall stress predicts ventricular remodeling after anteroseptal myocardial infarction in the Healing and Early Afterload Reducing Trial (HEART): an echocardiography-based structural analysis. Am Heart J. 2001;141(2):234–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Konstam MA, Kronenberg MW, Rousseau MF, et al. Effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril on the long-term progression of left ventricular dilatation in patients with asymptomatic systolic dysfunction. SOLVD (Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction) Investigators. Circulation. 1993;88(5 Pt 1):2277–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Randomised, placebo-controlled trial of carvedilol in patients with congestive heart failure due to ischaemic heart disease. Australia/New Zealand Heart Failure Research Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1997;349(9049):375–80.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, et al. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(24):1845–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T, et al. Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(12):873–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Batista RJ, Santos JL, Takeshita N, Bocchino L, Lima PN, Cunha MA. Partial left ventriculectomy to improve left ventricular function in end-stage heart disease. J Card Surg. 1996;11(2):96–7; discussion 8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Batista RJ, Verde J, Nery P, et al. Partial left ventriculectomy to treat end-stage heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64(3):634–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Schreuder JJ, Steendijk P, van der Veen FH, et al. Acute and short-term effects of partial left ventriculectomy in dilated cardiomyopathy: assessment by pressure-volume loops. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(7):2104–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Etoch SW, Koenig SC, Laureano MA, Cerrito P, Gray LA, Dowling RD. Results after partial left ventriculectomy versus heart transplantation for idiopathic cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117(5):952–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Angelini GD, Pryn S, Mehta D, et al. Left-ventricular-volume reduction for end-stage heart failure. Lancet. 1997;350(9076):489.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Franco-Cereceda A, McCarthy PM, Blackstone EH, et al. Partial left ventriculectomy for dilated cardiomyopathy: is this an alternative to transplantation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121(5):879–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Moreira LF, Stolf NA, Bocchi EA, et al. Partial left ventriculectomy with mitral valve preservation in the treatment of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115(4):800–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bestetti RB, Moreira-Neto F, Brasil JC, Bombonato R, Sgarbieri RN, Haddad J. Partial left ventriculectomy: preoperative risk factors for perioperative mortality. Int J Cardiol. 1998;67(2):143–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Gradinac S, Miric M, Popovic Z, et al. Partial left ventriculectomy for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: early results and six-month follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(6):1963–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Stolf NA, Moreira LF, Bocchi EA, et al. Determinants of midterm outcome of partial left ventriculectomy in dilated cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(5):1585–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. McCarthy JF, McCarthy PM, Starling RC, et al. Partial left ventriculectomy and mitral valve repair for end-stage congestive heart failure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;13(4):337–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Starling RC, McCarthy PM, Buda T, et al. Results of partial left ventriculectomy for dilated cardiomyopathy: hemodynamic, clinical and echocardiographic observations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(7):2098–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Dor V. Left ventricular aneurysms: the endoventricular circular patch plasty. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;9(2):123–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Froehlich RT, Falsetti HL, Doty DB, Marcus ML. Prospective study of surgery for left ventricular aneurysm. Am J Cardiol. 1980;45(5):923–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Di Donato M, Sabatier M, Dor V, et al. Effects of the Dor procedure on left ventricular dimension and shape and geometric correlates of mitral regurgitation one year after surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121(1):91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Di Donato M, Sabatier M, Dor V, Toso A, Maioli M, Fantini F. Akinetic versus dyskinetic postinfarction scar: relation to surgical outcome in patients undergoing endoventricular circular patch plasty repair. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(7):1569–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Dor V, Saab M, Coste P, Sabatier M, Montiglio F. Endoventricular patch plasties with septal exclusion for repair of ischemic left ventricle: technique, results and indications from a series of 781 cases. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;46(5):389–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Menicanti L, Di Donato M. The Dor procedure: what has changed after fifteen years of clinical practice? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124(5):886–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kaza AK, Patel MR, Fiser SM, et al. Ventricular reconstruction results in improved left ventricular function and amelioration of mitral insufficiency. Ann Surg. 2002;235(6):828–32.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Maxey TS, Reece TB, Ellman PI, Kern JA, Tribble CG, Kron IL. The beating heart approach is not necessary for the Dor procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76(5):1571–4; discussion 4–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Cope JT, Kaza AK, Reade CC, et al. A cost comparison of heart transplantation versus alternative operations for cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(4):1298–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Izumi S, Miyatake K, Beppu S, et al. Mechanism of mitral regurgitation in patients with myocardial infarction: a study using real-time two-dimensional Doppler flow imaging and echocardiography. Circulation. 1987;76(4):777–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kono T, Sabbah HN, Rosman H, Alam M, Jafri S, Goldstein S. Left ventricular shape is the primary determinant of functional mitral regurgitation in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20(7):1594–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Yoran C, Yellin EL, Becker RM, Gabbay S, Frater RW, Sonnenblick EH. Dynamic aspects of acute mitral regurgitation: effects of ventricular volume, pressure and contractility on the effective regurgitant orifice area. Circulation. 1979;60(1):170–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Blondheim DS, Jacobs LE, Kotler MN, Costacurta GA, Parry WR. Dilated cardiomyopathy with mitral regurgitation: decreased survival despite a low frequency of left ventricular thrombus. Am Heart J. 1991;122(3 Pt 1):763–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Chen FY, Adams DH, Aranki SF, et al. Mitral valve repair in cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1998;98(19 Suppl):II124–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Cohn LH, Rizzo RJ, Adams DH, et al. The effect of pathophysiology on the surgical treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation: operative and late risks of repair versus replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1995;9(10):568–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bolling SF, Deeb GM, Brunsting LA, Bach DS. Early outcome of mitral valve reconstruction in patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109(4):676–82; discussion 82–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Bolling SF, Pagani FD, Deeb GM, Bach DS. Intermediate-term outcome of mitral reconstruction in cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115(2):381–6; discussion 7–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Smolens IA, Pagani FD, Bolling SF. Mitral valve repair in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2000;2(4):365–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Sintek CF, Pfeffer TA, Kochamba G, Fletcher A, Khonsari S. Preservation of normal left ventricular geometry during mitral valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4(5):471–5; discussion 5–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Sarris GE, Cahill PD, Hansen DE, Derby GC, Miller DC. Restoration of left ventricular systolic performance after reattachment of the mitral chordae tendineae. The importance of valvular-ventricular interaction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;95(6):969–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Natsuaki M, Itoh T, Tomita S, et al. Importance of preserving the mitral subvalvular apparatus in mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61(2):585–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Komeda M, David TE, Rao V, Sun Z, Weisel RD, Burns RJ. Late hemodynamic effects of the preserved papillary muscles during mitral valve replacement. Circulation. 1994;90(5 Pt 2):II190–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Cohn LH, Couper GS, Kinchla NM, Collins Jr JJ. Decreased operative risk of surgical treatment of mitral regurgitation with or without coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16(7):1575–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Gangemi JJ, Tribble CG, Ross SD, McPherson JA, Kern JA, Kron IL. Does the additive risk of mitral valve repair in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy prohibit surgical intervention? Ann Surg. 2000;231(5):710–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Sheiban I, Tonni S, Marini A, Trevi G. Clinical and therapeutic implications of chronic left ventricular dysfunction in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75(13):23E–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ragosta M, Beller GA, Watson DD, Kaul S, Gimple LW. Quantitative planar rest-redistribution 201Tl imaging in detection of myocardial viability and prediction of improvement in left ventricular function after coronary bypass surgery in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function. Circulation. 1993;87(5):1630–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Pagano D, Bonser RS, Camici PG. Myocardial revascularization for the treatment of post-ischemic heart failure. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1999;14(6):506–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Trachiotis GD, Weintraub WS, Johnston TS, Jones EL, Guyton RA, Craver JM. Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(5):1632–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Dreyfus GD, Duboc D, Blasco A, et al. Myocardial viability assessment in ischemic cardiomyopathy: benefits of coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57(6):1402–7; discussion 7–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Tjan TD, Kondruweit M, Scheld HH, et al. The bad ventricle – revascularization versus transplantation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;48(1):9–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Lansman SL, Cohen M, Galla JD, et al. Coronary bypass with ejection fraction of 0.20 or less using centigrade cardioplegia: long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56(3):480–5; discussion 5–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Kaul TK, Agnihotri AK, Fields BL, Riggins LS, Wyatt DA, Jones CR. Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with an ejection fraction of twenty percent or less. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111(5):1001–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Bolling SF, Smolens IA, Pagani FD. Surgical alternatives for heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20(7):729–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Aziz T, Burgess M, Rahman AN, Campbell CS, Yonan N. Cardiac transplantation for cardiomyopathy and ischemic heart disease: differences in outcome up to 10 years. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20(5):525–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Maxey TS, Reece TB, Ellman PI, et al. Coronary artery bypass with ventricular restoration is superior to coronary artery bypass alone in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127(2):428–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Runyan S, Dobie S. CABG compared with PTCA in heart disease. J Fam Pract. 1998;46(2):112–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Gibbons RJ, Chatterjee K, Daley J, et al. ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(7):2092–197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Ogletree-Hughes ML, Stull LB, Sweet WE, Smedira NG, McCarthy PM, Moravec CS. Mechanical unloading restores beta-adrenergic responsiveness and reverses receptor downregulation in the failing human heart. Circulation. 2001;104(8):881–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Heerdt PM, Holmes JW, Cai B, et al. Chronic unloading by left ventricular assist device reverses contractile dysfunction and alters gene expression in end-stage heart failure. Circulation. 2000;102(22):2713–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Bruckner BA, Stetson SJ, Perez-Verdia A, et al. Regression of fibrosis and hypertrophy in failing myocardium following mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20(4):457–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Vatta M, Stetson SJ, Perez-Verdia A, et al. Molecular remodelling of dystrophin in patients with end-stage cardiomyopathies and reversal in patients on assistance-device therapy. Lancet. 2002;359(9310):936–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Pennington DG, Swartz MT. Mechanical circulatory support prior to cardiac transplantation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;2(2):125–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Long-term mechanical left ventricular assistance for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(20):1435–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Dor V, Sabatier M, Di Donato M, Montiglio F, Toso A, Maioli M. Efficacy of endoventricular patch plasty in large postinfarction akinetic scar and severe left ventricular dysfunction: comparison with a series of large dyskinetic scars. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116(1):50–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Acker MA. Dynamic cardiomyoplasty: at the crossroads. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68(2):750–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Hayward MP. Dynamic cardiomyoplasty: time to wrap it up? Heart. 1999;82(3):263–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 50th annual scientific session of the American College of Cardiology. Orlando, Florida, USA. March 18–21, 2001. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(2 Suppl A):1A–647A.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Hosenpud JD, Bennett LE, Keck BM, Fiol B, Boucek MM, Novick RJ. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: sixteenth official report – 1999. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999;18(7):611–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Steinman TI, Becker BN, Frost AE, et al. Guidelines for the referral and management of patients eligible for solid organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2001;71(9):1189–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irving Kron MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag London Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kron, I. (2016). Strategies in Surgical Management. In: Raman, J. (eds) Management of Heart Failure. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4279-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4279-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4278-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4279-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics