Skip to main content

Training Surgeons for Rectal Cancer Surgery: Clinical and Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1942 Accesses

Abstract

Rectal cancer surgery is complex, high stakes and is especially difficult to learn. This is due to the complex anatomy, rapid progression of technology and absolute necessity for optimal clinical and oncological outcomes. More often than not it is learnt within a traditional apprenticeship model, which is unsatisfactory. To overcome these difficulties educational principles must be used in conjunction with various training modalities. Cognitive training and virtual reality, animal and cadaveric simulation is necessary to climb the early part of the learning curve before operating on patients. Once in the operating room, interactive assistance, modular training and appropriate case selection ought to be combined to enhance the training experience whilst prioritizing patient safety. Competency based training progression has to be monitored and final competency demonstrated by assessment of operative videos and pathological specimens. Rectal cancer surgical training should occur in high volume centers of excellence with adequate volume, finances and appropriately trained faculty. This will result is a competency based, comprehensive, multimodal, multifocal and multi-site training program aimed at training high quality rectal surgeons whilst safeguarding patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Miskovic D, et al. Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery – an international multi-centre analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:1300–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Targarona EM, et al. Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Ann Surg. 2008;247(4):642–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):988–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE. Expertise in real world contexts. Organ Stud. 2005;26(5):779–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vygotsky LS. Interaction between learning and development, in Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes1978. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978. p. 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kneebone RL, et al. Simulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship. Med Educ. 2004;38(10):1095–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wood D, Bruner JS, Ross G. Role of tutoring in problem-solving. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1976;17(2):89–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller RH, Lalley JP. The learning pyramid: does it point teachers in the right direction? Educ Inf Technol. 2007;128(1):64–79.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rogers RG. Mental practice and acquisition of motor skills: examples from sports training and surgical education. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2006;33(2):297–304, ix.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arora S, et al. Mental practice enhances surgical technical skills: a randomized controlled study. Ann Surg. 2011;253(2):265–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Immenroth M, et al. Mental training in surgical education: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2007;245(3):385–91.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fried GM, et al. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2004;240(3):518–25; discussion 525–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Okrainec A, et al. Trends and results of the first 5 years of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification testing. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1192–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wyles SM, et al. Analysis of laboratory-based laparoscopic colorectal surgery workshops within the English national training programme. Surg Endosc. 2010;5:1559–66.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Giger U, et al. Laparoscopic training on Thiel human cadavers: a model to teach advanced laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(4):901–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stolzenburg JU, et al. Modular surgical training for endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2005;96(7):1022–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lund L, Dubrowski A, Carnahan H. A modular approach for training urologists in laparoscopy. BJU Int. 2007;100(6):1216–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hemandas A, et al. Modular training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery maximizes training opportunities without clinical compromise. World J Surg. 2011;35(2):409–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leong S, et al. Considerations on the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a view from the bottom. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22(9):1109–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmed M, et al. Identifying best practice guidelines for debriefing in surgery: a tri-continental study. Am J Surg. 2012;203(4):523–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miskovic D, et al. Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1136–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Palter VN, MacRae HM, Grantcharov TP. Development of an objective evaluation tool to assess technical skill in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi methodology. Am J Surg. 2011;201(2):251–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sarker SK, Kumar I, Delaney C. Assessing operative performance in advanced laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Surg. 2011;34(7):1594–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Miskovic D, et al. Is competency assessment at the specialist level achievable? A study for the national training programme in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England. Ann Surg. 2013;257(3):476–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miskovic D, et al. Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(3):796–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nagtegaal ID, et al. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(7):1729–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Palter VN, et al. Validation of a structured training and assessment curriculum for technical skill acquisition in minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):224–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Archampong D, Borowski DW, Dickinson HO. Impact of surgeon volume on outcomes of rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon. 2010;8(6):341–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Baek JH, et al. The association of hospital volume with rectal cancer surgery outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(2):191–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danilo Miskovic PhD, MD, FRCS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miskovic, D., Mackenzie, H. (2015). Training Surgeons for Rectal Cancer Surgery: Clinical and Simulation. In: Patel, H., Mould, T., Joseph, J., Delaney, C. (eds) Pelvic Cancer Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4258-4_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4258-4_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4257-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4258-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics