Worthen BR, Sanders JR, Fitzpatrick JL. Program evaluation. 2nd ed. New York: Addison Wesley Longman; 1987.
Wagner JA. Encyclopedia of the Hundred Years War. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group; 2006. p. 16–8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR 1999;48(No. RR-11). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/eval/framework/index.htm. Accessed June 19, 2013.
Friedman CP. A “fundamental theorem” of biomedical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(2):169–70. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2649317/?tool=pubmed. Last accessed 12 Mar 2013.
Scriven M. The methodology of evaluation. Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. In: AERA monograph series on curriculum evaluation, No. 1. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1967. p. 39–83.
Stetler CB, Legro MW, Wallace CM, Bowman C, Guihan M, Hagedorn H, Kimmel B, Sharp ND, Smith JL. The role of formative evaluation in implementation research and the QUERI experience. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21 Suppl 2:S1–8.
Benedict LG. Traditional research versus evaluation. U.S. Department of Education. 1975. ERIC. Web. ED100959. Available from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED100959.pdf. Cited 8 Apr 2013.
Unite for Sight. Module 10: Distinguishing evaluation from research. Available at: http://www.uniteforsight.org/evaluation-course/module10. Cited 1 Aug 2013.
Guba E. Significant differences. Edu Res. 1969;20:4–5.
Bainbridge L. Mental models in cognitive skill: the example of industrial process operation. In: Rogers Y, Rutherford A, Bibby PA, editors. Models in the mind. San Diego: Academic; 1992. p. 119–43.
Ammenwerth E, et al. Evaluation of health information systems—problems and challenges. Int J Med Inform. 2003;71(2):125–35.
Taylor RS. Value-added processes in the information life cycle. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1982;33:341–6.
Thacker SB, Qualters JR, Lee LM. Public health surveillance in the United States: evolution and challenges. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012;61(Suppl):3–9.
Laventure M. State and local perspective on Public Health Data Standards: opportunities for strategic action. Presented at: Annual meeting on Public Health Data Standards Consortium, Bethesda, 16–18 March 2004. Powerpoint slides.
Avgerou C. The significance of context in information systems and organizational change. Inf Syst J. 2001;11(1):43–63.
Lorenzi NM, et al. Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(2):79–93.
Ramaprasad A, Rai A. Envisioning management of information. Omega. 1996;24(2):179–93.
Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care—an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(5):542–9.
Heeks R, Bathnagar S. Understanding success and failure in information age reform. In: Heeks R, editor. Reinventing government in the information age. London: Routledge; 1999. p. 49–74.
One Health Initiative Web site. URL: http://www.onehealthinitiative.com/. Last accessed 1 Apr 2013.
Kaufman D, et al. Applying an evaluation framework for health information system design, development, and implementation. Nurs Res. 2006;55(2):S37–42.
Stead WW, et al. Designing medical informatics research and library – resource projects to increase what is learned. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1(1):28–33.
Currie LM. Evaluation frameworks for nursing informatics. Int J Med Inform 2005;74(11–12):908–16.
Yusof MM, Parazafeiropoulou A, Paul RJ, Stergioulas LK. Investigating evaluation frameworks for health information systems. Int J Med Inform 2008;77(6):377–85.
Cronholm S, Goldkuhl G. Strategies for information systems evaluation-six generic types. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 2003;6(2):65–74.
Friedman CP, Wyatt J. Evaluation methods in biomedical informatics. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, 2006.
Westbrook JI, et al. Evaluating the impact of information communication technologies on complex organizational systems: a multi-disciplinary, multi-method framework. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 2):1323–7.
Anderson JG. Evaluation in health informatics: social network analysis. Comput Biol Med. 2002;32(3):179.
Merrill J, et al. Description of a method to support public health information management: organizational network analysis. J Biomed Inform. 2007;40(4):422.
Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(3):166–206.
DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res. 1992;3(1):60–95.
Delone WH. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manage Inf Syst. 2003;19(4):9–30.
Fehrenbach N, Ross D, Hastings T, Renahan-White A. Towards measuring value: an evaluation framework for public health information systems. Public Health Informatics Institute. 2005. Web. Last accessed 1 Apr 2013.
Hebert M. Telehealth success: evaluation framework development. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;2:1145–9.
Cronholm S. Information Systems Evaluation-adding process descriptions to six evaluation types. European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation ECITE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Conferences Limited; 2004.
“tool, n.”. OED Online. March 2013. Oxford University Press. Accessible from: http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/203258?rskey=WzPh27&result=1. Cited 8 Apr 2013.
Health Resource and Services Administration. Health IT Adoption Toolbox. Accessed from: http://www.hrsa.gov/healthit/toolbox/. Cited 8 Apr 2013.
Cusack CM, Byrne C, Hook JM, McGowan J, Poon EG, Zafar A. Health Information Technology Evaluation Toolkit: 2009 Update (Prepared for the AHRQ National Resource Center for Health Information Technology under Contract No. 290-04-0016.) AHRQ Publication No. 09-0083-EF. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2009.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR. 1999;48 (No. RR-11). URL: http://www.cdc.gov/eval/framework/index.htm. Last accessed 12 Mar 2013.
Friedman CP. “Smallball” evaluation: a prescription for studying community-based information interventions. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005;93(4 Suppl):S43.
Brender J. Handbook of evaluation methods for health informatics. Burlington, MA: Academic Press, 2006.
Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Incorporated; 2008.
Ericsson KA, Ralf TK, Clemens TR. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100(3):363.
Butler MA, Bender AD. Intensive care unit bedside documentation systems. Realizing cost savings and quality improvements. Comput Nurs. 1999;17(1):32.
Heathfield H, Pitty D, Hanka R. Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges. BMJ. 1998;316:1959–61.
Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Mahler C, Kandert M, Eichstadter R. Are quantitative methods sufficient to show why wards react differently to computer-based nursing document? In: Surjan G, Engelbrecht R, McNair P, editors. Proceedings of the 17th international congress of the European Federation for Medical Informatics (Medical Informatics Europe 2002 – health Data in the Information Society), 25–29 Aug 2002, Budapest, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Vol. 90. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2002, p. 377–81.