Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Maritime Governance and Policy-Making pp 395–431Cite as

So, What Next?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1459 Accesses

Abstract

Alternative ways forward to improve maritime governance are discussed. These include institutional change, reform of attitudes within the industry and wider consideration of flows, speed and Cosmic capitalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderton, T., & Winchester, N. (2002). Globalization and de-regulation in the maritime industry. Marine Policy, 26, 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. (2003). Lost geographies of power. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, J. A., & Petkus, E., Jr. (1994). Towards a stakeholder-based policy process: an application of the social marketing perspective to environmental policy development. Policy Sciences, 27, 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. M. (1994). Mobility and state autonomy: toward a structural theory of international monetary relations. International Studies Quarterly, 38(2), 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, J. (1999a). Paul Virilio: An introduction. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, J. (1999b). From modernism to hypermodernism and beyond: An interview with Paul Virilio. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, J. (1999c). Paul Virilio: A select bibliography. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, J. (2000a). Beyond postmodernism? Paul Virilio’s hypermodern cultural theory, ctheory.net. www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=133.

  • Armitage, J. (Ed.). (2000b). From modernism to hypermodernism and beyond. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, J., & Graham, P. (2001). Dromoeconomics: Towards a political economy of speed. Parallax, 7(1), 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, R. (1966). Peace and war; A theory of international relations. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall, M. (1995). Moveable feast. Avebury: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1987). The gamma paradigm for studying the domestic influence on foreign policy. Washington, DC: Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayee, J. R. A. (1994). An anatomy of public policy implementation: The case of decentralization policies in Ghana. Avebury: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, J. (Ed.) (1999a). SPEED—A workshop on space, time and mobility, Transportradets notatserie, nr. 99–05. Transportradet, Kobenhavn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, J. (1999b). Introduction—Risks, benefits and tools of speed. In J. Beckmann (Ed.), SPEED—A workshop on space, time and mobility (pp. 7–10), Transportradets notatserie, nr. 99–05 Transportradet, Kobenhavn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, J. (2004). Mobility and safety. Theory Culture and Society, 21(4/5), 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, D. (1991). Legitimation. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benko, G. (1997). Introduction: Modernity, postmodernity and the social sciences. In G. Benko & U. Strohmayer (Eds.), Geography, history and social science (pp. 1–48). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, P. (2000). Environmental governance and private actors: enrolling insurers in international maritime regulation. Political Geography, 19, 875–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, L. (1993). Between modernism and postmodernism. Progress in Human Geography, 17(4), 490–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, J. K. (2001). Debordering the world of states: Towards a multi-level system in Europe and a multi-polity system in North America? Insights from border regions. European Journal of International Relations, 7(2), 175–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borzel, T. A. (2007). European governance—Negotiation and competition in the shadow of hierarchy. Montreal, Canada: European Studies Association Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman-Gilfillan. (2004). The use or abuse of the corporate veil in shipping: Is legislation needed to unveil it, if so, for what reasons? http://www.bowman.co.za.

  • Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1998). Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D, 16(4), 459–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, E. A. (1985). The World economy since the war—The politics of uneven development. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, V., & Roe, M. S. (2010). The potential for the clustering of the maritime transport sector in the Greater Dublin region. Maritime Policy and Management, 37(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. R., & Pallis, A. A. (2008). Assessing port governance models: process and performance components. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(4), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugger, N. (1999). A critical introduction to the works of Paul Virilio. In J. Beckmann (Ed.), SPEED—a workshop on space, time and mobility (pp. 11–21), Transportradets notatserie, nr. 99–05. Kobenhavn: Transportradet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghy, T. (1990). Lost between state and market: The politics of economic adjustment in Ghana, Zambia and Nigeria. In J. Nelson (Ed.), Economic crisis and policy choice: The politics of adjustment in the third world (pp. 257–321). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Čapek, K. (1936). Válka s mloky (War with the newts). London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1989). The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring and the urban regional process. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The information age. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000a). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000b). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P. G. (1995). Globalization and the changing logic of collective action. International Organization, 49(4), 595–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charan, R., & Freeman, R. E. (1979). Building bridges with corporate constituents. Management Review, 68(11), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, K. (2006). Interrogating “newness”. Globalization and postcolonial theory in the age of endless war. Cultural Critique, 62, 126–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coeck, C., & Dooms, M. (2007). The practical application of stakeholder management in ports: A cross-case analysis of best practices in world ports. Annual Conference of the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2001). European governance. A white paper, COM (2001) 428, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2008). An integrated maritime policy for the European Union, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2009). Towards an integrated maritime policy for better governance in the Mediterranean, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM (2009) 466 Final, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Global Governance. (1995). Our global neighbourhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, V. A. (1999). The passenger: Paul Virilio and feminism. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (1990). Back to the future. Modernity, postmodernity and locality. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 9(1), 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crogan, P. (1999a). Theory of the state. Deleuze, Guattari and Virilio on the state, technology and speed, Angelaki. Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 4(2), 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crogan, P. (1999b). The tendency, the accident and the untimely: Paul Virilio’s engagement with the future. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, B. L. (1996). Policy implementation: The organizational challenge. World Development, 24(9), 1403–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubitt, S. (1999). Virilio and new media. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Langen, P. W. (2007). Stakeholders, conflicting interests and governance in port clusters. In M. R. Brooks & K. P. Cullinane (Eds.), Devolution, port governance and port performance (pp. 457–477). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa Santos, B. (1995). Globalization, nation-states and the legal field, from legal diaspora to legal ecumene? In B. de Sousa Santos (Ed.), Towards a new common sense: Law, science and politics in the paradigmatic transition (pp. 250–377). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vivero, J. L. S., Mateos, J. C. R., & del Corral, D. F. (2009). Geopolitical factors of maritime policies and marine spatial planning: state, regions and geographical planning scope. Marine Policy, 13, 624–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Derian, J. (1990). The (s)pace of international relations: Simulation, surveillance, and speed. International Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Derian, J. (1992). Antidiplomacy: Spies, terror, speed and war. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Derian, J. (1999). The conceptual cosmology of Paul Virilio. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1984). No apocalypse, not now (full speed ahead, seven missiles, seven missives). Diacritics, 14, 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., & Yeung, W. (2001). Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks, 1(2), 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, P. (2009). The cosmos as capitalism’s outside. Sociological Review, 57(1), 66–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, P., & Ormrod, J. S. (2006). The outer spatial fix. critical approaches to outer space panel. BISA Annual Conference, Cork, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, P., & Ormrod, J. S. (2007). Cosmic society. Towards a sociology of the universe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. (1999). Making stakeholder theory whole. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 237–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooms, M., Macharis, C., & Verbeke, A. (2004, August 25–29). Proactive stakeholder management in the port planning process: Empirical evidence from the port of Brussels. European Regional Science Association 44th European Congress, Porto, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, D. (1978). Boundary role conflict: Negotiations as dual responsiveness. In J. W. Zartman (Ed.), The negotiation process: Theories and applications (pp. 100–101). Beverly Hills: Sage. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P., Jacobson, H., & Putnam, R. (Eds.). (1993). Double edged diplomacy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, A., Guthrie, J., Steane, P., Roos, G., & Pike, S. (2003). Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organization. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (2000). Reading Castells: Zeitdiagnose and social theory. Environment and Planning D, 18, 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furger, F. (1997). Accountability and systems of self-governance: The case of the maritime industry. Law and Policy, 19(4), 445–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gane, M. (1999). Paul Virilio’s bunker theorizing. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins, J. R., & Reimer, B. (1999). The politics of postmodernity: An introduction to contemporary politics and culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilfedder, D. (1994). Virilio: The cars that ate Paris. Transition, 43, 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A. (1999). Practicability, paradigms, and problems in stakeholder theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 228–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1, 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordenker, L., & Weiss, T. G. (1995). Pluralising global governance: Analytical approaches and dimensions. Third World Quarterly, 16(3), 357–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. (1994). Sustaining economic reform in Sub-Saharan Africa: Issues and implications for USAID, Implementing policy change project (Working Paper No. 6). Washington, DC: US Agency for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S. (1990). The political economy of the Philippine debt crisis. In J. Nelson (Ed.), Economic crisis and policy choice: The politics of adjustment in the third world (pp. 215–256). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S. (1995). The reform of the state in Latin America. Unpublished Draft Manuscript, Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, University of California, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., Held, D., & McGrew, T. (Eds.). (1992). Modernity and its futures. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The urban experience. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism. Towards a theory of uneven geographical development. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I. (1999). Globalism and its discontents: Notes of a wandering scholar. Profession, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, R. (2009). Crisis time: Networks, acceleration and politics within late capitalism, ctheory.net, www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=618.

  • Hemmati, M., Dodds, F., & Enayati, J. (2002). Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability: Beyond. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, M. (2008). Governance, value chains and networks: an afterword. Economy and Society, 37(3), 452–459.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1998). The nation and globalization. Constellations, 5(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1964). Europe’s identity crisis: Between past and America. Daedalus, 93(4), 12–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1995). The European Sisyphus. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseus, D., & Pal, L. A. (1997). Anatomy of a policy area: The case of shipping. Canadian Public Policy, XXIII(4), 399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (1988). Transnational corporations and uneven development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1997). Capitalism and its future: Remarks on regulation, government and governance. Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), 561–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. G. (2001). The European Union: An evolving system of multi-level governance…or government? Policy and Politics, 29(2), 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, M. (1989). International financial institutions and the politics of adjustment. In J. Nelson (Ed.), Fragile Coalitions: The politics of economic adjustment (pp. 139–159). Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D. (1999). Virilio, war and technology: Some critical reflections. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, J. (1991). Europe: The nation–state dies hard. Capital and Class, Spring, 43, 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, N. (1999). Virilio and architecture. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. W., & Wigen, K. E. (1997). The myth of continents. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, M. M., & Ramirez, N. (1989). Managing adjustment in developing countries. San Francisco, CA: International Center for Economic Growth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, T. W. (1991). The discipline of security studies and the codes of containment: Learning from Kuwait. Alternatives, 16, 315–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 503–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangat, R. (2001). The death of distance? Globalization of international relations, E-merge. Student Journal of International Affairs, 2, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1992). Das kapital (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1989). Implementation and public policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuire, S. (1999). Blinded by the (speed of) light. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, D. N. (1962). Cybernation: The silent conquest. Santa Barbara, California: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelet, J. (1833). Histoire de la France (Vol. 1). Paris: A Lacroix and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. E., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1967). Politics among nations: The Struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. M. (Ed.). (1989). Fragile coalitions: The politics of economic adjustment. Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, L. D., & Jespersen, P. H. (2001). Time and space in freight transport. In L. D. Nielsen & H. H. Oldrup (Eds.), Mobility and transport (pp. 63–72). Denmark: Transportradet, Aalborg University, Department of Development and Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, L. D., & Oldrup, H. H. (Eds.). (2001). Mobility and transport. Denmark: Transportradet, Aalborg University, Department of Development and Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. (2002). The quest for sustainable port development: Managing stakeholder relations in a highly competitive environment. Proceedings of the 8th IACP Conference on Port Cities and World Trade, Dalian, China: Urban Strategies and Industrial Dynamics, International Association of Cities and Ports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. E., & Winkelmans, W. (2002). Stakeholder relations management in ports: Dealing with the interplay of forces among stakeholders in a changing economic environment, Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Conference, Panama City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallis, A. A. (2005–2006). Maritime interest representation in the EU. European Political Economy Review, 3(2), 6–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallis, A. A., & Tsiotsis, S. G. P. (2006). Inside EU-Level maritime interest groups: Structures, lobbying practices and governance, Interim results of a research project at the Jean Monnet Centre in European Port Policy. Department of Shipping Trade and Transport, University of the Aegean, Chios.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. (2009). Capitalists in space. Sociological Review, 57(1), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M., & Bell, D. (Eds.). (2009a). Space travel and culture: From Apollo to space tourism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M., & Bell, D. (2009b). Introduction: Making space. Sociological Review, 57(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelton, J. N. (2004). Satellites as worldwide change agents. In J. N. Pelton, R. J. Oslund, & P. Marshall (Eds.), Communications Satellites. Global change agents. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelton, J. N., Oslund, R. J., & Marshall, P. (Eds.). (2004). Communications satellites. Global change agents. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2001). Developments in intergovernmental relations: Towards a multi-level governance. Policy and Politics, 29(2), 131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, S. (1991). The internationalization of the state, capital and class. Spring, 43, 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, S. (1998, April 16). Globalization, liberalization, regulation. Conference on Globalization, The Nation–state and Violence, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, R., & Douvere, F. (2008). The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Marine Policy, 32, 816–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J. (1968). The future of upward mobility. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poster, M. (1984). Foucault, Marxism and history: Mode of production versus mode of information. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poster, M. (1990). The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchala, D. J. (1972). Of blind men, elephants and international integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 10(3), 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (2000). The Governance of fragmegration: Neither a world republic nor a global interstate system. Quebec: Congress of the International Political Sciences Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. (Ed.). (1982). New theories of the multinational enterprize. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M. (1995). Contemporary acceleration: World-time and world-space. In G. Benko & U. Strohmayer (Eds.), Geography, history and social sciences (pp. 171–176). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, G. T. (1981). The Significance of interruptions in same sex dyadic converstaions. Invited Panel Verbal and Non-Verbal Investigations in Dyadic Conversations. Non-verbal Communication Interest Group, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A. (2000). Globalization. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sletmo, G. K. (2002, November 13–15). National shipping policy and global markets: A retrospective for the future. International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference (IAME), Panama City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, G. H., & Diesing, P. (1977). Conflict among nations: Bargaining, decision-making and systems structure in international crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, A., & Bricmont, J. (1998). Intellectual impostures. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalder, F. (2006). Manuel Castells. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. (1989). Regime politics: Governing atlanta 1946–1988. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. (1997). The regional world. Territorial development in a global economy. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1976). Who runs world shipping? International Affairs, 52(3), 346–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state. The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, M., & Nichols, S. (2006). Issues in the governance of marine spaces. In M. Sutherland (Ed.), Administering marine spaces: International issues (pp. 6–20). Copenhagen: International Federation of Surveyors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (2000a). World cities and territorial states under conditions of contemporary globalization. Political Geography, 19, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (2000b). Worlds of large cities; pondering Castells’ space of flows. Third World Planning Review, 21(3), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (2000c). World cities and territorial states under conditions of contemporary globalization II: Looking forward, looking ahead. GeoJournal, 52, 157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (2005). New political geographies: global civil society and global governance through world city networks. Political Geography, 24, 703–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tradewinds. (2010). Shipowners turn Athens screw, September 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1977). Speed and politics. An essay on dromology. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1995). Speed and information: Cyberspace alarm! ctheory.net, www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=72.

  • Virilio, P. (1998). Military space. In J. Der Derian (Ed.), The Virilio reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1999). Indirect light: Extracted from polar inertia. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, G. (1996). Nietzsche’s corps/e: Aesthetics, politics, prophecy or, the spectacular technoculture of everyday life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. J., Slack, B. (2002). Port governance in China: A case study of Shanghai. Occasional Paper Series, (Paper No. 9). The Centre for China Urban and Regional Studies: Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. J., Ng, A. K., & Olivier, D. (2004). Port governance in China: A review of policies in an era of internationalizing port management practices. Transport Policy, 11, 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wark, M. (1988). On technological time: cruising Virilio’s over-exposed city. Arena, 83, 82–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, P. (1999). The brave new world of Manuel Castells: What on earth (or in the ether) is going on? Development and Change, 30, 357–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M. J. (1991). Mapping meaning: Denoting difference, imagining density; Dialectical images and postmodern geographies. Geografiska Annaler, 73(B), 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. (2002). Theories of the information society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. G. (1990). Implementing policy reforms in LDCs: A strategy for designing and effecting change. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J. (1989). The shadow state: Transformations in the voluntary sector. In J. Wolch & M. Dear (Eds.), The power of geography: How territory shapes social life (pp. 197–221). London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E.M. (1997) Modernity, postmodernity or capitalism? Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), 539–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W. (2000). Embedding foreign affiliates in transnational business networks: The case of Hong Kong firms in south-east Asia. Environment and Planning A, 32, 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacher, M. W., & Sutton, B. A. (1996). Governing global networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurbrugg, N. (1999). Virilio, Stelarc and terminal technoculture. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurn, M. (2003). Globalization and global governance; from societal to political denationalization. European Review, 11(3), 341–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Plymouth Business School, Plymouth University, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK

    Michael Roe

Authors
  1. Michael Roe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Roe .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roe, M. (2013). So, What Next?. In: Maritime Governance and Policy-Making. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4153-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4153-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4152-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4153-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation