Skip to main content

Simulation of Near-Field Pulse-Like Ground Motion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Improving the Earthquake Resilience of Buildings

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

Abstract

The accurate prediction of ground motions from possible future earthquakes is the first step toward the robust assessment and mitigation of structural damage against earthquake hazards. The modeling of critical or resonant ground motions has been developed by the present authors in several studies. These studies showed that the resonant ground motion has its energy in a narrow frequency range and produces larger damage in the structure compared to ordinary records. Resonant or pulse-like ground motion has been observed in near-field records with directivity focusing or fling effects. Such ground motion is influenced by the rupture mechanism and possesses the following characteristics: (1) large peak ground velocities and displacements, (2) concentration of energy in a single or a few pulses, and (3) unusual response spectra shapes. These features have been recently studied by these authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abbas AM (2002) Deterministic/reliability-based critical earthquake load models for linear/nonlinear engineering structures. PhD. Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abbas AM, Manohar CS (2002) Investigations into critical earthquake excitations within deterministic and probabilistic frameworks. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 31:813–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abbas AM (2006) Critical seismic load inputs for simple inelastic structures. J Sound Vib 296:949–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abbas AM, Manohar CS (2007) Reliability-based vector nonstationary random critical earthquake excitations for parametrically excited systems. Struct Saf 29:32–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Takewaki I (2002) Seismic critical excitation method for robust design: a review. J Struct Eng 128:665–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Takewaki I (2004) Bound of earthquake input energy. J Struct Eng 130:1289–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Takewaki I (2006) Probabilistic critical excitation method for earthquake energy input rate. J Eng Mech 132(9):990–1000

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Moustafa A, Takewaki I (2010) Critical characterization of pulse-like near-fault strong ground motion. Struct Eng Mech 34(6):755–778

    Google Scholar 

  9. Benioff H (1955) Mechanism and strain characteristics of the white wolf fault as indicated by aftershocks sequence, earthquakes in Kern County, California during 1952. Calif Dept Nat Res Div Mines Bull 171:199–202

    Google Scholar 

  10. Housner GW, Hudson DE (1958) The Port Hueneme earthquake of March 18, 1957. Bull Seismol Soc Am 48(2):163–168

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moustafa A (2010) Discussion of analytical model of ground motion pulses for the design and assessment of seismic protective systems. J Struct Eng 136:229–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson JC, Bertero VV (1987) Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes. J Struct Eng 113(8):1709–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sasani M, Bertero VV (1978) Importance of severe pulse-like ground motions in performance-based engineering: historical and critical review. In: Proceedings of the twelfth world conference on earthquake engineering, Aukland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bertero VV, Mahin SA, Herrera RA (1978) Aseismic design implications of near-fault San Fernando earthquake records. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 6:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2003) A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(3):1099–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2004) Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 33:687–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang CT (2003) Considerations of multimode structural response for near-field earthquakes. J Struct Eng 129:458–467

    Google Scholar 

  18. Makris N (1997) Rigidity–plasticity–viscosity: can electrorheological dampers protect base- isolated structures from near-source ground motions? Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 26:571–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Makris N, Chang SP (2000) Response of damped oscillators to cycloid pulses. J Eng Mech 126:123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang J, Makris N (2001) Rocking of free-standing blocks under cycloidal pulses. J Eng Mech 127(5):473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Malhotra PK (1999) Response of building to near-field pulse-like ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 28:1309–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bray JD, Rodriguez-Marek A (2004) Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:815–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hall JH, Heaton TH, Halling MW, Wald DJ (1995) Near-source ground motion and its effect on flexible buildings. Earthq Spectra 11:569–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Iwan W (1997) Drift spectrum: measure of demand for earthquake ground motions. J Struct Eng 123(4):379–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalkan E, Kunnath SK (2007) Effective cyclic energy as a measure of seismic demand. J Earthq Eng 11:725–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mavroeidis GP, Dong G, Papageorgiou AS (2004) Near-source ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 33:1023–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cao H, Friswell MI (2009) The effect of energy concentration of earthquake ground motions on the nonlinear response of RC structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:292–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Krawinkler H, Alavi B, Zareian F (2005) Impact of near-fault pulses on engineering design: directions in strong motion instrumentation In: Gulkan P, Anderson JG (eds) Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2002) Near-source strong ground motion: characteristics and design issues. In: Proceedings of the seventh US national conference on earthquake engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, 21–25 July 2002

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moustafa A (2009) Discussion of the effect of energy concentration of earthquake ground motions on the nonlinear response of RC structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:1181–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Somerville PG, Smith N, Graves R, Abrahamson N (1997) Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):199–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Baker JW (2007) Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(5):1486–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Baker JW (2008) Identification of near-fault velocity pulses and prediction of resulting response spectra. In: Proceedings of the geotechnical earthquake engineering and structural dynamics IV, Sacramento, CA, 18–22 May 2008

    Google Scholar 

  34. Suzuki S, Asano K (2000) Simulation of near source ground motion and its characteristics. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. He WL, Agrawal AK (2008) Analytical model of ground motion pulses for the design and assessment of seismic protective systems. J Struct Eng 134(7):1177–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity. In seismic design of nuclear power plants. MIT press, Cambridge, pp 438–468

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wilson EL (2002) Three-dimensional static and dynamic analysis of structures: a physical approach with emphasis on earthquake engineering, 3rd edn. Computers & Structures Inc., CA

    Google Scholar 

  38. Clough RW, Penzien J (2003) Dynamics of structures, 3rd edn. Computers & Structures Inc, CA

    Google Scholar 

  39. Abbas AM, Manohar CS (2005) Reliability-based critical earthquake load models. Part 1: linear structures. J Sound Vib 287:865–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Abbas AM, Manohar CS (2005) Reliability-based critical earthquake load models. Part 2: nonlinear structures. J Sound Vib 287:883–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Moustafa A, Takewaki I (2010) Deterministic and probabilistic representation of near-field pulse-like ground motion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(5):412–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. PEER. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (2005). http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/search.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Takewaki, I., Moustafa, A., Fujita, K. (2013). Simulation of Near-Field Pulse-Like Ground Motion. In: Improving the Earthquake Resilience of Buildings. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4144-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4144-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4143-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4144-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics