Abstract
The ground motion is a realization in space and simultaneous consideration of multiple components of ground motion is realistic and inevitable in the reliable design of structures . It is often assumed practically that there exists a set of principal axes in the ground motions. It is well recognized in the literature that the principal axes are functions of time and change their directions during the ground shaking. In the current structural design practice, the effect of the multi-component ground motions is often taken into account by use of the SRSS method (square root of the sum of the squares) or the CQC3 method (extended Complete Quadratic Combination rule).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Rigato AB, Medina RA (2007) Influence of angle of incidence on seismic demands for inelastic single-storey structures subjected to bi-directional ground motions. Eng Struct 29(10):2593–2601
Ghersi A, Rossi PP (2001) Influence of bi-directional ground motions on the inelastic response of one-storey in-plan irregular systems. Eng Struct 23(6):579–591
Penzien J, Watabe M (1975) Characteristics of 3-dimensional earthquake ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 3:365–374
Clough RW, Penzien J (1993) Dynamics of structures, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Smeby W, Der Kiureghian A (1985) Modal combination rules for multicomponent earthquake excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 13:1–12
Menun C, Der Kiureghian A (1998) A replacement for the 30 %, 40 %, and SRSS rules for multicomponent seismic analysis. Earthq Spectra 14(1):153–163
Lopez OA, Chopra AK, Hernandez JJ (2000) Critical response of structures to multicomponent earthquake excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29:1759–1778
Athanatopoulou AM (2005) Critical orientation of three correlated seismic components. Eng Struct 27:301–312
Nigam NC (1983) Introduction to random vibrations. MIT Press, London
Drenick RF (1970) Model-free design of aseismic structures. J Engrg Mech Div, ASCE 96(EM4):483–493
Shinozuka M (1970) Maximum structural response to seismic excitations. J Engrg Mech Div, ASCE 96(EM5):729–738
Iyengar RN, Manohar CS (1987) Nonstationary random critical seismic excitations. J Engrg Mech, ASCE 113(4):529–541
Manohar CS, Sarkar A (1995) Critical earthquake input power spectral density function models for engineering structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 24:1549–1566
Abbas AM, Manohar CS (2002) Investigations into critical earthquake load models within deterministic and probabilistic frameworks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(4):813–832
Abbas AM, Manohar CS (2002) Critical spatially-varying earthquake load models for extended structures. J Struct Engrg (JoSE, India) 29(1):39–52
Abbas AM, Manohar CS (2007) Reliability-based vector nonstationary random critical earthquake excitations for parametrically excited systems. Struct Safety 29:32–48
Takewaki I (2001) A new method for nonstationary random critical excitation. Earthq Engrg Struct Dyn 30(4):519–535
Takewaki I (2002) Seismic critical excitation method for robust design: a review. J Struct Engrg ASCE 128(5):665–672
Takewaki I (2004) Critical envelope functions for non-stationary random earthquake input. Comput Struct 82(20–21):1671–1683
Takewaki I (2004) Bound of earthquake input energy. J Struct Engrg ASCE 30(9):1289–1297
Takewaki I (2006) Probabilistic critical excitation method for earthquake energy input rate. J Engrg Mech ASCE 132(9):990–1000
Takewaki I (2006) Critical excitation methods in earthquake engineering. Elsevier Science, Oxford
Sarkar A, Manohar CS (1996) Critical cross power spectral density functions and the highest response of multi-supported structures subjected to multi-component earthquake excitations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:303–315
Sarkar A, Manohar CS (1998) Critical seismic vector random excitations for multiply supported structures. J Sound Vib 212(3):525–546
Fujita K, Takewaki I (2010) Critical correlation of bi-directional horizontal ground motions. Eng Struct 32(1):261–272
Fujita K, Yoshitomi S, Tsuji M, Takewaki I (2008) Critical cross-correlation function of horizontal and vertical ground motions for uplift of rigid block. Eng Struct 30(5):1199–1213
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Computation of Coherence Function and Transformation of PSD Matrices
Let \( \ddot{u}_{g1} \) and \( \ddot{u}_{g2} \) denote the ground-motion accelerations along the building structural axes X 1 and X 2, respectively. Under the 2DGM along the principal axes of ground motions in the P–W model, \( \ddot{u}_{g1} \) and \( \ddot{u}_{g2} \) are described by
where \( \ddot{u}_{z1} \) and \( \ddot{u}_{z2} \) are the ground-motion accelerations along the principal axes of ground motions. θ denotes the angle between two sets of horizontal axes (= incident angle).
Let \( {\mathbf{S}}_{{\ddot{Z}\ddot{Z}}} (\omega) \) denote the auto PSD matrix of the components along the principal axes of ground motions. Then the PSD matrix, consisting of S 11, S 22, S 12, S 21, of the components along the building structural axes may be described as
The coherence function between the components of ground motions along the building structural axes is defined by
where E[ · ] denotes the ensemble mean. It is assumed in the P–W model that there is no correlation between the 2DGM along the principal axes of ground motions (i.e. \( E[\ddot{u}_{z1} \ddot{u}_{z2}] = 0 \)). Let γ org denote the ratio of the auto PSD functions \( S_{{\ddot{Z}_{2} \ddot{Z}_{2}}} (\omega)/S_{{\ddot{Z}_{1} \ddot{Z}_{1}}} (\omega) \) along the principal axes of ground motions. Substitution of \( \ddot{u}_{g1} \) and \( \ddot{u}_{g2} \) in Eq. (11.21) into Eq. (11.24) and some manipulations provide
Appendix 2: Horizontal Stiffness of Frame
Let u 1 and ϕ AB denote the horizontal displacement of the upper node in the frame and the angle of member rotation of column, respectively. When the horizontal force is denoted by P 1, the horizontal stiffness of the plane frame can be expressed as
The extreme-fiber stress at the top of the column under one-directional horizontal input may be expressed by
From the moment equilibrium around the node B, the angle of rotation of the node B can be expressed by
Equation (11.28) and the equation of story equilibrium provide
Then the story stiffness can be expressed by
Appendix 3: Stochastic Response 1
The auto-correlation function of \( \sigma_{BA}^{1} (t) \) can be expressed by
The auto-correlation function of w 1(t) can be described in terms of the auto PSD function S 11(ω) by
Equation (11.31) can then be modified to
By substituting t 1 = t 2 = t, τ 1 = τ 2 = τ in Eq. (11.33), the mean-squares \( E[\sigma_{BA}^{1} (t)^{2}] \) can be derived as
where
On the other hand, the component in the direction X 2 may be transformed into
The auto-correlation function of w 2(t) can be described in terms of the auto PSD function S 22(ω) by
The mean-squares \( E[\sigma_{BA}^{2} (t)^{2}] \) can be derived as
where
Appendix 4: Stochastic Response 2
The cross-correlation function of \( \sigma_{BA}^{1} (t) \) and \( \sigma_{BA}^{2} (t) \) can be expressed as
The cross-correlation function of w 1(t) and w 2(t) can be described in terms of the cross PSD function S 12(ω) by
Let us introduce the definition of the cross PSD function \( S_{12} (\omega) = C_{12} (\omega) + {\text{i}}Q_{12} (\omega) \).
Then Eq. (11.41) can be expressed by
The cross-term can be modified into
Another cross-correlation function \( E[\sigma_{BA}^{2} (t_{1})\sigma_{BA}^{1} (t_{2})] \) may be described by
By combining both cross terms, the corresponding term can be expressed finally by
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Takewaki, I., Moustafa, A., Fujita, K. (2013). Critical Correlation of Bidirectional Horizontal Ground Motions. In: Improving the Earthquake Resilience of Buildings. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4144-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4144-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4143-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4144-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)