Skip to main content

Studying Humans to Inform Interactive Narrative Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity and Rationale

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS,volume 20))

  • 1565 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes the rationale behind studying humans in collaborative story domains to better inform interactive narrative technology practices. It describes two exemplar projects, the study of tabletop gamemasters and improvisational actors. It discusses how these projects point to a potential future direction of interactive narrative technology research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baumer, A., & Magerko, B. (2009). Narrative development in improvisational theatre. In Proceedings of 2nd international conference on interactive digital storytelling (pp. 140–151), GuimarĂŁes, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumer, A., & Magerko, B. (2010). An analysis of narrative moves in improvisational theatre. In Proceedings of 3rd international conference on interactive digital storytelling, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, N., Boyang, L., O’Neill, B., Riedl, M., & Nitsche, M. (2011). Distributed creative cognition in digital filmmaking. In 8th ACM conference on creativity and cognition, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, A., Magerko, B., & Mishra, P. (2006). Gamemasters and interactive story: A categorization of storytelling techniques in live roleplaying. In Futureplay, London, Ontario, FuturePlay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harger, B. (2008). Project Improv. Project Improv. http://www.etc.cmu.edu/projects/improv/

  • Hayes-Roth, B., & Van Gent, R. (1996). Story-making with improvisational puppets and actors. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). How jazz musicians improvise. Music Perception, 19(3), 415–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1989). Cognitive models and prototype theory. In Ulric Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development (pp. 63–100). Cambridge/England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magerko, B. (2007). Evaluating preemptive story direction in the interactive drama architecture. Journal of Game Development, 2(3), 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magerko, B., Manzoul, W., Riedl, M., Baumer, A., Fuller, D., Luther, K., & Pearce, C. (2009). An empirical study of cognition and theatrical improvisation. In Proceeding of the seventh ACM conference on creativity and cognition (pp. 117–126). New York: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magerko, B., Fiesler, C., & Baumer, A. (2010). Fuzzy micro-agents for interactive narrative. In Proceedings of the sixth annual AI and interactive digital entertainment conference. Palo Alto: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magerko, B., DeLeon, C., & Dohogne, P. (2011a). Digital improvisational theatre: Party quirks. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on intelligent virtual agents. ReykjavĂ­k: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magerko, B., Dohogne, P., & DeLeon, C. (2011b). Employing fuzzy concepts for digital improvisational theatre. In Proceedings of the seventh annual international artificial intelligence and interactive digital entertainment conference. Palo Alto: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça, D., & Wallace, W. A. (2004). Cognition in jazz improvisation: An exploratory study. Cognitive Science Society annual meeting, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, B., Piplica, A., Fuller, D., & Magerko, B. (2011). A knowledge-based framework for the collaborative improvisation of scene introductions. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on interactive digital storytelling. Vancouver: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peinado, F., & Gervás, P. (2007). Automatic direction of interactive storytelling: Formalizing the game master paradigm. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on virtual storytelling: Using virtual reality technologies for storytelling (pp. 196–201). Berlin/Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlin, K., & Goldberg, A. (1996). Improv: A system for scripting interactive actors in virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (pp. 205–216). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressing, J. (1998). Psychological constraints on improvisation. In B. Nettl & M. Russell (Eds.), In the course of performance: Studies in the world of musical improvisation (1st ed., pp. 47–67). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinholdsson, P. (1998). Making music together: An interactionist perspective on small-group performance in jazz. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Musicologica Upsaliensia, Nova Series 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, M. O. (2010). A comparison of interactive narrative system approaches using human improvisational actors. In Proceedings of the intelligent narrative technologies III workshop. Monterey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. L., & Isbell, C. L. (2008). A survey and qualitative analysis of recent advances in drama management. International Transactions on Systems Science and Applications, Special Issue on Agent Based Systems for Human Learning, 4 (2), 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, J. E., Johnson, E. J., & Stephens, D. L. (1989). The Validity of Verbal Protocols. Memory and Cognition, 17, 759–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarath, E. (1996). A new look at improvisation. Journal of Music Theory, 40(1), 1–38.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Improvised dialogues: Emergence and creativity in conversation. Westport: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartjes, I., Kruizinga, E., & Theune, M. (2008). Let’s pretend I had a sword. In 1st international conference on interactive digital storytelling (pp. 264–267). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Magerko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Magerko, B. (2013). Studying Humans to Inform Interactive Narrative Technology. In: Carroll, J. (eds) Creativity and Rationale. Human–Computer Interaction Series, vol 20. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4111-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4111-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4110-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4111-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics