Advertisement

Exploring the Virtual Space of Academia

  • Maria MenendezEmail author
  • Antonella de Angeli
  • Zeno Menestrina
Conference paper

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to provide a view on how researchers present themselves in a social network specifically developed for supporting academic practices, how they share information and engage in dialogues with colleagues worldwide. We analysed data from 30,428 users who have registered on a publicly available website to study the effect of academic position, university ranking and country on people’s behaviour. Results suggest that the virtual network closely mirrors physical reality, reproducing the same hierarchical structure imposed by position, ranking, and country on user behaviour. Despite the potential for bridging and bonding social capital the networks have not achieved substantial changes in structures and practices of the academic context. Furthermore, our analysis highlights the need of finding new strategies to motivate the users to contribute to the community and support equal participation, as so far the community is mainly exploited as a static website.

Keywords

Social Network Social Capital Faculty Member Independent Researcher Country Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Our thanks to Academia.edu for allowing this research and, in particular, to Richard Price for kindly answering all our questions.

References

  1. 1.
    Ardichvili, A., Page, V., Wentling, T.: Motivations and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. J. Knowl. Manag. 7(1), 64–77 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyd, D.M., Ellison, N.B.: Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 13(1), article 11. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brzozowski, M.J., Sandholm, T., Hogg, T.: Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP ’09), pp. 61–70, ACM Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DiMicco, J.M., Millen, D.R.: People Sensemaking with Social Networking Sites. CHI 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Farrell, S., Lau, T., Nusser, S., Wilcox, E., Muller, M.: Socially augmenting employee profiles with people-tagging. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST ’07), pp. 91–100, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gangadharbatla, H.: Facebook me: collective self-esteem, need to belong, and internet self-efficacy as predictors of the iGeneration’s attitudes toward social networking sites. J. Interact. Advert. 8(2), 1–28 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huysman, M., Wulf, V.: IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis. J. Inf. Technol. 21(1), 40–51 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joinson, A.N.: ‘Looking at’, ‘Looking up’ or ‘Keeping up with’ People? Motives and Uses of Facebook. CHI 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lampe, C., Ellison, N., Steinfield, C.: A Familiar Face(book): Profile Elements as Signals in an Online Social Network. CHI 2007 (2006). doi:10.1145/1240624.1240695Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lampe, C., Wash, R., Velasquez, A., Ozkaya, E.: Motivations to Participate in Online Communities. CHI 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papacharissi, Z.: The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of facebook, linkedIn and ASmallWorld. N. Media. Soc. 11(1–2), 199–220 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ploderer, B., Howard, S., Thomas, P.: Being online, living offline: the influence of social ties over the appropriation of social network sites. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW 1908), pp. 333–342. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008). (doi:10.1145/1460563.1460618)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rhode, M.: Building social capital in an Iranian NGO community system. In: Huysman, M., Wulf, V. (eds.) Social Capital and Information Technology. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richter, A., Riemer, K.: Corporate social networking sites—modes of use and appropriation through co-evolution. In: 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Skeels, M.M., Grudin, J.: When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of facebook and linkedIn. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP ’09), pp. 95–104. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J.M., Ellison, N.B., Lampe, C.: Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Communities and Technologies Conference (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Toma, C.L.: Affirming the Self through Online Profiles: Beneficial Effects of Social Networking Sites. CHI 2010 (2010). doi:10.1145/1753326.1753588Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Wäljas, M., Ojala, J., Segerståhl, K.: Identifying Drivers and Hindrances of Social User Experience in Web Services. CHI 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu, A., DiMicco, J.M., Millen, D.R.: Detecting Professional versus Personal Closeness Using an Enterprise Social Network Site. CHI 2010 (2010). doi:10.1145/1753326.1753622Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Menendez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Antonella de Angeli
    • 1
  • Zeno Menestrina
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science (DISI)University of TrentoPOVO–TrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations