Advertisement

Struggling Against Social Isolation of the Elderly—The Design of SmartTV Applications

Conference paper

Abstract

This chapter charts a work in progress in the frame of the European project AAL FoSIBLE. Our hypothesis is that virtual networks and online generational communities could offset the lack of relationship, prevent isolation and increase self-esteem for older people living alone at home. Following this purpose, we are then aiming at defining services by rethinking the use of well-known existing technologies and to broaden their scope to be more affordable by older people. This chapter describes related work on the use of the Internet for social interactions among the elderly. The living Lab approach we follow and our results on understanding the actual use and needs of the elderly are presented, followed by the SmartTV platform which is iteratively developed. The analysis of the use of this platform being designed in a user-centred approach will permit us to answer our research issues.

Keywords

Remote Control Gesture Recognition Virtual Network Virtual Community User Centre Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partly funded by the European Community and the National Research Agency (ANR) through the AAL 169 program (FoSIBLE Project No. ANR-09-AALI-002-04).

References

  1. 1.
    Robert-Bobée, I.: Projections de population pour la France métropolitaine à l’horizon 2050, La population continue de croître et le vieillissement se poursuit. Insee Première n° 1089 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sixsmith, A.: An evaluation of an intelligent home monitoring system. J. Telemed. Telecare. 6(2), 63–72 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whitten, P., Collins, B., Mair, F.: Nurse and patient reactions to a developmental home telecare system. J. Telemed. Telecare. 4(3), 152–160 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T.B., Bradley, J.: Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 7(7), 1–20 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Riche, Y., Mackay, W.: PeerCare: supporting awareness of rhythms and routines for better aging in place. Comput. Support. Coop. Work. 19(1), 73–104 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P., Wilson, S.: Older adults’ perceptions and experiences of online social support. Interact. Comput. 21(3), 159–172 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blit-Cohen, E., Litwin, H.: Elder participation in cyberspace: a qualitative analysis of Israeli retirees. J. Aging Stud. 18(4), 385–398 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wright, K.: Computer-mediated social support, older adults, and coping. J. Commun. 50(3), 100–118 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lepa, J., Tatnall, A.: Using actor-network theory to understanding virtual dommunity networks of older people using the internet. J. Bus. Syst., Gov. Ethics. 1(4), 1–14 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanayama, T.: Ethnographic research on the experience of Japanese elderly people online. N. Media Soc. 5(2), 267–288 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jetter, H.-C., Gerken, J., Reiterer, H.: Natural User Interfaces: Why we need better model-worlds, Not better gestures. Paper presented at the CHI 2010 Workshop—Natural User Interfaces: The Prospect and Challenge of Touch and Gestural Computing, Atlanta, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schaffers, H., Sallstrom, A., Pallot, M., Hernandez-Munoz, J.M., Santoro, R., Trousse, B.: “Integrating Living Labs with Future Internet experimental platforms for co-creating services within Smart Cities,” Concurrent Enterprising (ICE), 2011 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, pp. 1–11, 20–22 June (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greenbaum, J., Kyng, M.: Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1991)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schuler, D., Namioka, A.E.: Participatory Design, Lawrence Erlbaum 1993 and chapter 11 in Helander’s Handbook of HCI. Elsevier, Mahwah (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aarts, E.H.L., Marzano, S.: The New Everyday: Views on Ambient Intelligence, p. 46. 010 Publishers, Rotterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V.-P., Kulkki, S., Hribernik, K.A.: Living labs as a multi-contextual R&D methodology. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, 26–28 June 2005, Milan, Italy (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pallot, M.: Engaging Users into Research and Innovation: The Living Lab Approach as a User Centred Open Innovation Ecosystem. Webergence Blog. http://www.cwe-projects.eu/pub/bscw.cgi/1760838?id = 715404_1760838 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ballon, P., Pierson, J., Delaere, S.: Test and experimentation platforms for broadband and innovation: examining European practice. In: Proceedings of the 16th European Regional Conference by the International Telecommunications Society (ITS), 4–6 Sept 2005, Porto, Portugal (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schumacher, J., Feurstein, K.: Living labs—the user as co-creator. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, 4–6 June 2007, Sophia-Antipolis, France (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ECOSPACE Newsletter No 5.: http://www.ami-communities.eu/wiki/ECOSPACE_Newsletter_No_5Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    ISTAG Working Group on Experience and Application Research: “Involving Users in the Development of Ambient Intelligence” (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mäkäräinen-Suni, I.: Best practices, innovation and development: experiences from five living lab innovation environments. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, 23–25 June 2008, pp. 129–136, Lisbon, Portugal (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cooper, A.: The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity. Sams—Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Troyes University of Technology (UTT), ICD/Tech-CICO—UMR CNRS 6279Troyes CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations