Advertisement

Use of Graphical Modality in a Collaborative Design Distant Setting

  • Stéphane SafinEmail author
  • Roland Juchmes
  • Pierre Leclercq
Conference paper

Abstract

In this chapter, we are interested in studying the use of the graphical modality (digital sketch and document annotations) as a tool for collective design and remote communication. This study takes place in the framework of a 3 months long collaborative architectural design studio, gathering students from Belgium and France to remotely work together in three small groups. The study focuses on the role of the graphical modality inside synchronous remote meetings supported by the Distributed Collaborative Design Studio (DCDS). The DCDS enables multimodal real-time remote exchanges, and aims at remotely re-creating the conditions of co-present meetings. This environment associates a videoconference tool (supporting verbal and non-verbal communication) and an original real-time shared digital hand-drawn sketches system (supporting graphical communication). We identify the types of digital annotations made on the imported document (thanks to the electronic pen), as well as their role in the cognitive design processes and in the collaborative and communication processes. We also identify the different practices of digital sketching, in regard to each group and its collaborative strategies. We discuss the utility of the graphical modality as an efficient support for collaborative synchronous activities and show that the DCDS environment supports different strategies of collaborative design (co-design and distributed design). We conclude on recommendations for improving the system and for designing sketch-based collaborative environments.

Keywords

CSCL Architecture Multimodal collaboration Pen-based interaction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by a funding from the Research Council of the University of Liège, and by the ARC grant, financed by the French Community of Belgium. The authors wish to thank all the students and teachers who took part to the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Boujut, J.-F.: Workshop Proceedings of 9th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems. Improving shared representations by linking discursive and graphical aspects of design. Int. Rep. Socio Inform. 7(1), 177–190 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burkhardt, J.-M., Détienne, F., Hebert, A.-M., Perron, L., Safin, S., Leclercq, P.: An approach to assess the quality of collaboration in technology-mediated design situations. In: Proceedings of ECCE 2009: European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. Helsinki, September (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carroll, J.M., Neale, D.C., Isenhour, P.L., Rosson, M.B., McCrickard, D.S.: Notification and awareness: synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 58, 605–632 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clarck, H., Brennan, S.: Grounding in communication. In: Resnick, L., Levine, J., Teasley, S. (eds.) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Darses, F.: Processus psychologiques de résolution collective des problèmes de conception: contribution de la psychologie ergonomique. Unpublished HDR—habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, Université Paris V—René Descartes (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Darses, F., Falzon, P., Béguin, P.: Collective design processes. Paper presented at the COOP 96, Second International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Juan-les- Pins (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Détienne, F., Boujut, J.-F., Hohmann, B.: Characterization of collaborative design and interaction management activities in a distant engineering design situation. Paper presented at the COOP 2004—Cooperative systems design: scenario-based design of collaborative systems (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elsen, C., Leclercq, P.: A sketching tool to support collaborative design. CDVE’08, 5th International Conference on Cooperative Design, Vizualisation and Engineering, Mallorca, Spain (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kubicki, S., Bignon, J.-C., Lotz, J., Gilles Halin, G., Elsen, C., Leclercq, P.: Digital Cooperative Studio. ICE 2008 14th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, Special session ICT-supported Cooperative Design in Education, Lisboa, Espagne (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roschelle, J., Teasley, S.: The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In: O’Malley, C.E. (ed.) Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 69–97.Springer, Heidelberg (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Safin, S., Juchmes, R., Leclercq, P.: Du crayon au stylo numérique: influences des IHM à stylo et des interprétations numériques sur l’activité graphique en tâches de conception. J. Interact. Pers. Syst. 2(1), 1:1–1:31 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Safin, S., Leclercq, P.: User studies of a sketch-based collaborative distant design solution in industrial context. In: Proceedings of CDVE 2009. The 6th International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization and Engineering, Luxembourg, September (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Safin, S., Verschuere, A., Defays, A., Burkhardt, J.-M., Détienne, F.: Quality of collaboration in a distant collaborative architectural educational setting. Workshop W1: Analysing the quality of collaboration in task-oriented computer-mediated interactions, in COOP 2010: 9th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems. Aix-en-Provence, May (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spada, H., Meier, A., Rummel, N., Hauser, S.: A new method to assess the quality of collaborative process in CSCL. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years! (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stempfle, J., Badke-Schaub, P.: Thinking in design teams-an analysis of team communication. Des. Stud. 23, 473–496 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Visser, W.: Conception individuelle et collective. Approche de l’ergonomie cognitive. INRIA—Institut national de la Recherche en Informatique et Automatique, Le Chesnay, France (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stéphane Safin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Roland Juchmes
    • 1
  • Pierre Leclercq
    • 1
  1. 1.LUCID-ULg—Lab for User Cognition and Innovative DesignUniversity of LiègeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations