Supporting Collaborative Work in Socio-Physical Environments: A Normative Approach

  • Catherine GarbayEmail author
  • Fabien Badeig
  • Jean Caelen
Conference paper


We propose a normative approach to collaborative support system design in distributed tangible environments. Based on activity theory, our goal is to mediate rather than drive human activity and to integrate components from the physical, numerical and social environments. We propose an original architecture coupling a physical space (tools supporting human activity), a processing space (agent performing activity, be it human or artificial), an informational space (traces reflecting activity), and a normative space (filters regulating activity). We further consider collaboration as a conversational process grounded in the objects of the working space. To this end, tangible objects of various kinds are designed to support multi-threaded activity. Heterogeneous trace properties may then be fused to situate activity and ground the filtering process. Interface agents are designed to provide appropriate visual feedback and support mutual awareness. Beyond the mere sharing of individual or group activity, we approach awareness as involving mutual knowledge of the activity constraints. We show through simple examples from the RISK game the potential richness of the proposed approach.


Collaboration architectures Tangible Distributed Interfaces Activity Theory Normative Multi-Agent Systems 



Work supported by Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) under grant IMAGIT—project ANR 2010 CORD 01701.


  1. 1.
    Boella, G., van der Torre, L.V.N., Verhagen, H.: Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Comput. Math. Org. Theory. 12, 71–79 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boissier, O., Balbo, F., Badeig, F.: Controlling multi-party interaction within normative multiagent organisations. In: Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems VI (LNAI 6541). Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bourguin, G., Derycke, A., Tarby, J.: Beyond the interface: co-evolution inside interactive systems a proposal founded on activity theory. In: IHM-HCI 2001 Conference, People and Computer XV—Interactions Without Frontiers, pp. 297–310. Springer, Berlin (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clauzel, D., Sehaba, K., Prié, Y.: Enhancing synchronous collaboration by using interactive visualisation of modelled traces. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory. 19, 84–97 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cole, M.: Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dumazeau, C., Karsenty, L.: Communications distantes en situation de travail: favoriser l’établissement d’un contexte mutuellement partagé. Le travail humain 71, 225–252 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engestrom, Y.: Developmental work research: reconstructing expertise through expansive learning. In: Nurminen M., Weir G., (eds.) Human Jobs and Computer Interfaces, pp. 265–290. Cambridge University Press, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Erickson, T., Kellogg, W.: Social translucence: using minimalist visualizations of social activity to support collective interaction. In: Höök, K., Benyon, D., Munroe A. (eds.) Designing Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach, pp. 17–41. Springer, London (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gâteau, B., Boissier, O., Khadraoui, D., Dubois, E.: Controlling an interactive game with a multi-agent based normative organizational model. In: Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems Workshop (COIN) at the 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), Italy (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greenberg, S.: Context as a dynamic construct. Hum. Comput. Interact. 16, 257–268 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kraut, R.E., Fussell, R., Siegel, J.: Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Hum. Comput. Interact. 18, 13–49 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuutti, K.: Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In: Nardi B. (eds.) Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction, pp. 17–44. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lepreux, S., Kubicki, S., Kolski, C., Caelen, J.: Distributed interactive surfaces using tangible and virtual objects. In: Workshop DUI 2011 Distributed User Interfaces, at CHI 2011, pp. 65–68, Canada (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lewandowski, A.: Vers de meilleurs supports aux activités coopératives en accord avec la co-évolution: application au développement logiciel coopératif. Ph.D. thesis, Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nardi, B.: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. In: Nardi B. (eds.) Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction, pp. 69–103. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Okuyama, F., Bordini, R., da Rocha Costa, A.: A distributed normative infrastructure for situated multi-agent organisations. In: 6th International Workshop on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT) to held as part of AAMAS-2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pape, J.A., Graham, T.C.: Coordination policies for tabletop gaming. In: Proceedings of the graphics interface poster, pp. 24–25 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Salembier, P., Zouinar, M.: Intelligibilité mutuelle et contexte partagé, Inspirations conceptuelles et réductions technologiques. Activités. 1, 64–85 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shaer, O., Hornecker, E.: Tangible user interfaces: past, present and future directions. Hum. Comput. Interact. 3, 1–138 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sire, S., Chatty, S.: Vers des interfaces à collaboration directe pour le travail de groupe. In: Proceedings of the GRESICO communication, société et internet, pp. 259–275 (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LIG, Université de GrenobleGrenoble Cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations