Skip to main content

Supply Chain Disturbances: Contextualising the Cost of Risk and Uncertainty in Outsourcing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decision-Making for Supply Chain Integration

Part of the book series: Decision Engineering ((DECENGIN,volume 1))

Abstract

Supply chain disturbance factors, namely risks and uncertainties, although hard to measure, are central in influencing outsourcing decisions. Assessing the holistic cost of these disturbances within the context of supply chain (SC) activities is the focus of this chapter. By assessing holistic cost, firms will be advantageously positioned to make more informed outsourcing decisions. In order to better understand and contextualise the causes and consequences of cost disturbances during outsourcing we carried out five case studies with leading UK engineering firms. A resulting ‘disturbance’ framework seeks to assist in capturing the cost of risk and uncertainty in an outsourcing context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, M. (2010). Apple delays global release of iPad. The Times. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article7097310.ece. Accessed 10 Mar 2011.

  • Arvis, J. F., Mustra, M. A., Panzer, J., & Ojala, L. (2007). Connecting to compete: Trade logistics in the global economy. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian food worker (2009). Melamine contamination of the global food chain. http://asianfoodworker.net/?p=440. Accessed 15 Dec 2010.

  • Aubert, B. A., Patry, M., & Rivard, S. (2005). A framework for information technology outsourcing risk management. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 36(4), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, N., Khan, Z. (2005). A taxonomy of refereed outsourcing literature. Monash University Business and Economics Working Paper, 22/05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, R., & Sohal, A. (2005). Supply chain competitiveness: Measuring the impact of location factors, uncertainty and manufacturing practices. Technovation, 25(5), 443–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackhurst, J., Wu, T., & O’Grady, P. (2007). A network-based decision tool to model uncertainty in supply chain operations. Production Planning and Control, 18(6), 526–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boute, R., Disney, S., Lambrecht, M., & Van Houdt, B. (2008). A win-win solution for the bullwhip problem. Production Planning and Control, 19(7), 708–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BSI (2002). Guide 73: 2002 risk management—vocabulary—guidelines for use in standards. British Standards Institution (BSI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunyaratavej, K., Hahn, E. D., & Doh, J. P. (2007). International offshoring of services: A parity study. Journal of International Management, 13(1), 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childerhouse, P., & Towill, D. R. (2002). Analysis of the factors affecting real-world value stream performance. International Journal of Production Research, 40(15), 3499–3518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., & Lee, H. (2004). Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5), 388–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cucchiella, F., & Gastaldi, M. (2006). Risk management in supply chain: A real option approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(6), 700–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Hek, P. A., & Mukherjee, A. (2011). Joint venture buy-outs under uncertainty. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 59(1), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, H. C., Alfnes, E., Strandhagen, J. O., & Thomassen, M. K. (2009). Global supply chain control systems: A conceptual framework for the global control centre. Production Planning and Control, 20(2), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., Cho, D. S., & Chu, W. C. (1998). Strategic supplier segmentation: The next “best practice” in supply chain management. California Management Review, 40(2), 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L., & Maltz, A. (1995). The use of total cost of ownership concepts to model the outsourcing decision. International Journal of Logistics Management, 6(2), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faisal, M. N., Banwet, D. K., & Shankar, R. (2006). Supply chain risk mitigation: Modeling the enablers. Business Process Management Journal, 12(4), 535–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdows, K. (1997). Made in the world: Global spread of production. Production and Operations Management, 6(2), 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, P. (2004). Supply chain risk management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(2), 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C.H., Whitney, D.E. (1996). Is the make-buy decision process a core competence? Working paper Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraering, M., & Prasad, S. (1999). International sourcing and logistics: An integrated model. Logistics Information Management, 12(6), 451–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., & Galetto, M. (2003). Outsourcing: Guidelines for a structured approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10(3), 246–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, S., Childerhouse, P., & Towill, D. R. (2002). Uncertainty and the seamless supply chain. Supply Chain Management Review, 6(4), 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghauri, P., & Grønhaug, K. (2010). Research methods in business studies (4th ed.). London: FT Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore D (2008) Supply chain comment: Chrysler’s prototype electric car and outsourcing product design. http://www.scdigest.com. Accessed 5 Dec 2010.

  • Graf, M., & Mudambi, S. M. (2005). The outsourcing of IT-enabled business processes: A conceptual model of the location decision. Journal of International Management, 11(2), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harland, C., Brenchley, R., & Walker, H. (2003). Risk in supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(2), 51–62.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson I (2010) Latest IBM Layoffs Blamed on Outsourcing. http://www.fiercecio.com/story/latest-ibm-layoffs-blamed-outsourcing/2010-03-03. Accessed 10 April 2011.

  • Hätönen, J., & Eriksson, T. (2009). 30 + years of research and practice of outsourcing—exploring the past and anticipating the future. Journal of International Management, 15(2), 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2011). Operations Management (10th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, M. S. (2010). Your next supply chain. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(2), 17–24.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P., Mclvor, R., & Huang, G. (2002). An expert system for evaluating the make or buy decision. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 42(2–4), 567–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2009) GUIDE 73: 2009(E/F) Risk management—Vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremic, T., Tukel, O. I., & Rom, W. O. (2006). Outsourcing decision support: A survey of benefits, risks, and decision factors. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(6), 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalwani, C. S., Pawar, K. S., & Shah, J. (2007a). Contextualisation framework for the manufacturing supply chain. Nottingham: University of Nottingham Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalwani, C. S., Pawar, K. S., & Shah, J. (2007b). Contextualisation of supply chain networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamming, R. (1996). Squaring lean supply with supply chain management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 16(2), 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L. (2002). Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. California Management Review, 44(3), 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, C. P., & Liu, B. J. (2009). Why India is mainly engaged in offshore service activities, while China is disproportionately engaged in manufacturing. China Economic Review, 20(2), 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, R., & Romis, M. (2007). Improving work conditions in a global supply chain. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, C. (1999). Effectively managing vertical supply relationships: A risk management model for outsourcing. Supply Chain Management An International Journal, 4(4), 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason-Jones, R., Towill, D.R. (1998). Shrinking the supply chain uncertainty circle. IOM Control 24(7):17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIvor, R. (2008). What is the right outsourcing strategy for your process? European Management Journal, 26, 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIvor, R., Humphreys, P., & McAleer, W. (1997). A strategic model for the formulation of an effective make or buy decision. Management Decision, 35(2), 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward, D. (2010). Qantas threatens to sue rolls royce over airbus engine faults. Daily Telegraph, 5 Feb 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min, H. (1994). International supplier selection: A multiattribute utility approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 24(5), 24–33.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. R., & Daley, J. M. (1994). Logistics issues in international Sourcing: An exploratory study. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30(3), 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naim, M. M., Childerhouse, P., Disney, S. M., & Towill, D. R. (2002). A supply chain diagnostic methodology: Determining the vector of change. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 43(1–2), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawar, K.S., Gupta, A., Lalwani, C.S., Shah, J., Ghosh, D., Eschenbacher, J. (2005). Outsourcing to India. Paper presented at the The 37th Annual Convention of OR Society of India, Ahmebadad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawar, K. S., & Sharifi, S. (1997). Physical or virtual team collocation: Does it matter? International Journal of Production Economics, 52(3), 283–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, H. (2005). Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: An integrated framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 35(4), 210–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, H. (2006). Reconciling supply chain vulnerability with risk and supply chain management. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 9(2), 127–142.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prater, E., Biehl, M., & Smith, M. A. (2001). International supply chain agility—Tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(5/6), 823–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puga, D. (2002). European regional policies in light of recent location theories. Journal of Economic Geography, 2(4), 373–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (2000). Outsourcing innovation: The new engine of growth. Sloan Management Review, 41(4), 13–28.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sahay, B. S., Gupta, J. N. D., & Mohan, R. (2006). Managing supply chains for competitiveness: The Indian scenario. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(1), 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (2010). Hidden champions of the 21st century. Bonn: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, P. R., Whitman, L. E., & Malzahn, D. (2004). Methodology to mitigate supplier risk in an aerospace supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(2), 154–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1976). The nature and causes of the wealth of nations: An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (Vol. 1). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spekman, R. E., & Davis, E. W. (2004). Risky business: Expanding the discussion on risk and the extended enterprise. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5), 414–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. S. (2006). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 9(1), 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapiero, C. S., & Grando, A. (2006). Supply risk and inventory outsourcing. Production Planning and Control, 17(5), 534–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taps, S. B., & Steger-Jensen, K. (2007). Aligning supply chain design with manufacturing strategies in developing regions. Production Planning and Control, 18(6), 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2011). The global car industry–after the quake: Japanese carmakers are shaken–that helps their rivals. The Economist. http://www.economist.com/node/18712767. Accessed 25 May 2011.

  • The World Bank (2010). International logistics performance index: Ranking. http://www1.worldbank.org/PREM/LPI/tradesurvey/mode1b.asp#ranking. Accessed 25 Mar 2011.

  • Transparency International (2011). Transparency international corruption perceptions index. http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi. Accessed 15 May 2011.

  • Underdown, R., & Talluri, S. (2002). Cycle of success: A strategy for becoming agile through benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 9(3), 278–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vorst, J. G. A. J., & Beulens, A. J. M. (2002). Identifying sources of uncertainty to generate supply chain redesign strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 32(6), 409–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, S. K. (1989). International sourcing: Implications for just-in-time manufacturing. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 30(3), 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vining, A., & Globerman, S. (1999). A conceptual framework to understand the outsourcing decision. European Management Journal, 17(6), 645–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W.M., 2002. Cultivating communities of practice: A practical guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilding, R. (1998). The supply chain complexity triangle: Uncertainty generation in the supply chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 28(8), 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (2007). German firms retreat from the Eastern front. The Sunday Times, 25 Nov.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2010). Medicines: Counterfeit medicines. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs275/en. Accessed 25 Nov 2010.

  • Yamamura N (2009). Exploring manufacturing industry outsourcing relationships from a customer service perspective. Unpublished dissertation, University Business School, Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z., Hsu, K., & Lillie, J. (2001). Outsourcing—a strategic move: The process and ingredient for success. Management Decision, 39(5), 373–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin, G. (2003). A grounded definition of supply risk. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(5–6), 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Rogers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rogers, H., Pawar, K., Braziotis, C. (2012). Supply Chain Disturbances: Contextualising the Cost of Risk and Uncertainty in Outsourcing. In: Chan, H., Lettice, F., Durowoju, O. (eds) Decision-Making for Supply Chain Integration. Decision Engineering, vol 1. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4033-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4033-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4032-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4033-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics