Technological Management of Atomic-Multinology by Social Network Theory

  • Taeho Woo
Part of the Springer Series in Reliability Engineering book series (RELIABILITY)


The technology evolution is investigated. The proposed atomic-multinology (AM) is quantified by the dynamical method incorporated with Monte-Carlo method. There are three kinds of the technologies as the info-technology (IT), nano-technology (NT), and bio-technology (BT), which are applied to the nuclear technology. AM is initiated and modeled for the dynamic quantifications. The social network algorithm is used in the dynamical simulation for the management of the projects. The result shows that the successfulness of the AM increases, where the 60 years are the investigated period. The values of the dynamical simulation increase in later stage, which means that the technology is matured as time goes on.


Atomic-multinology Nuclear power plants Social network Monte-carlo method Simulations 


  1. 1.
    Woo TH (2010) Management of energy policy in atomic-multinology (AM) using the system dynamics (SD) method. Ann Nuc Eng 37:707–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabási A-L, Brewer D, Christakis N, Contractor N, Fowle J, Gutmann M, Jebara T, King G, Macy M, Roy D, Alstyne MV (2009) Computational social science. Science 323(5915):721–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nuclear Energy Institute (2009) World nuclear power generation unitsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    United Nation (1992) The convention on biological diversity (Article 2. Use of Terms)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zijlstra GJ (1978–1979) Networks in public policy: nuclear energy in the Netherlands, Soc Net 1:359–389Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park J (2011) The use of a social network analysis technique to investigate the characteristics of crew communications in nuclear power plants—A feasibility study. Reliab Eng Sys Safe 96:1275–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marktanner M, Salman L (2011) Economic and geopolitical dimensions of renewable vs. nuclear energy in North Africa. Ener Pol 39:4479–4489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freeman L (2006) The development of social network analysis. Empirical Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freeman L (2004) The development of social network analysis. Empirical Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Radcliffe AR et al (1940) On social structure. J R An Thropo Inst 70:1–12Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nadel SF (1957) The theory of social structure. Cohen and West, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Granovetter M (2007) Introduction for the French reader. Sociologica 2:1–8Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mullins N (1973) Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tilly C (1974) An urban world. Little Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wellman B (1988) Structural analysis: from method and metaphor to theory and substance. Social structures: a network approach, Cambridge University Press, pp 19–61Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lomi A, Pallotti F (2011) Relational collaboration among spatial multipoint competitors. Soc Net 34:101–111 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vensim (2009) Vensim simulation software. Ventana Systems, IncGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taeho Woo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Nuclear EngineeringSeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations