Skip to main content

PERs Generalise Projections for Strictness Analysis (Extended Abstract)

  • Conference paper
Functional Programming, Glasgow 1990

Part of the book series: Workshops in Computing ((WORKSHOPS COMP.))

Abstract

We show how Wadler and Hughes’s use of Scott projections to describe properties of functions (“Projections for Strictness Analysis”, FPCA 1987) can be generalised by the use of partial equivalence relations. We describe an analysis (in the form of an abstract interpretation) for identifying such properties for functions defined in the simply typed λ-calculus. Our analysis has a very simple proof of correctness, based on the use of logical relations. We go on to consider how to derive ‘best’ correct interpretations for constants.

The full version of this paper is available as Departmental Report DOC 90/14, Dept. of Computing, Imperial College.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Abramsky. Abstract interpretation, logical relations and Kan extensions. Journal of Logic and Computation, 1 (1): 5–39, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Abadi and G. Plotkin. A per model of polymorphism and recursive types. In Logic in Computer Science. IEEE, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asp90] A. G. Asperti. Categorical Topics in Computer Science. PhD thesis, Università di Pisa, 199Œ.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G.L. Burn, C.L. Hankin, and S. Abramsky. Strictness analysis of higher-order functions. Science of Computer Programming, 7: 249–278, November 1986.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. G.L. Burn. Abstract Interpretation and the Parallel Evaluation of Functional Languages. PhD thesis, Department of Computing, Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. J. M. Hughes. Backwards analysis of functional programs. DoC Research Report CSC/87/R3, University of Glasgow, March 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saunders Mac Lane. Categories for the Working Mathematician. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1971.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Mycroft. Abstract Interpretation and Optimising Transformations for Applicative Programs. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Philip Wadler and R.J.M. Hughes. Projections for strictness analysis. In LNCS 27g. Functional Programming Languages and Computer Architectures, Oregon, USA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Simon L. Peyton Jones Graham Hutton Carsten Kehler Holst

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hunt, S. (1991). PERs Generalise Projections for Strictness Analysis (Extended Abstract). In: Jones, S.L.P., Hutton, G., Holst, C.K. (eds) Functional Programming, Glasgow 1990. Workshops in Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3810-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3810-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19667-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3810-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics