Advertisement

On-line Models

  • Gennady G. Kulikov
  • Haydn A. Thompson
Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)

Abstract

In the previous chapter complex thermodynamic modelling was introduced. It was highlighted that the complexity of these models results in a high computational burden. It was then shown how simpler models can be derived from this complex model that represent the key dynamics of the engine suitable for control system development. The chapter ended with the development of linear dynamic models. These allow performance at steady-state operating points to be considered and controller stability to be assessed for certification. However, the engine dynamics are known to be nonlinear. A limitation of linear models is that they only consider a small neighbourhood around steady-state conditions. In order to assess transient performance over the operating range of the engine, another form of model is required. Full thermodynamic nonlinear models tend to be too complicated for “real-time” calculations, although they are the most exact. Linear models are computationally faster, but can only be used over a narrow range of operating conditions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kulikov GG Real-time dynamic model of gas turbine engine with variable coefficients, In: Shevyakov AA, Martyanova TS, editors. Optimisation of Multivariable Control Systems of Aero Gas Turbine Engines. (In Russian). Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1989; pp. 81–88.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nise NS. Control Systems Engineering. New York: Benjamin & Cummings, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dutton K, Thompson S, Barraclough B. The Art of Control Engineering. New York: Addison-Wesley, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kerr LJ, Nemec TS, Gallops GW. Real-time estimation of gas turbine engine damage using a control-based Kaiman filter algorithm. ASME Trans. J. of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1992; 114:187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halasz N, Davidson P, Abu-Hakima S, Phan S. JETA: a knowledge-based approach to aircraft of gas turbine engine maintenance. J. of Applied Intelligence, 1992;2:25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Milne R, Trave-Massuyes L, Quevedo J. TIGER: numeric and qualitative model-based diagnosis. In: Proc. 13th IFAC Triennal World Congress, 1996; 127–132Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Isermann R, Balle P. Trends in the application of model-based fault detection and diagnosis of technical processes. In: Proc. 13th IFAC Triennal World Congress, 1996; 1–12.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Merrington GL. Fault diagnosis of gas turbine engines from transient data. ASME Trans. J of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1989; 111:237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Milne R, Trave-Massuyes L. Real-time model-based diagnosis of gas turbines. In: Proc. IMeC Workshop on Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for Fault Diagnosis in Process Control, 1994; 28–41.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Torella G, Lombardo G. Neural Networks for Diagnostics and Trouble-Shooting of Aero Engines. In: Proc. 5th AIDAA/AAAF/DGLR/RAeS European Propulsion Forum, EPF-95, Paper 95–03, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gennady G. Kulikov
    • 1
  • Haydn A. Thompson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Automated Control SystemsUfa State Aviation Technical UniversityRussia
  2. 2.Department of Automatic Control and Systems EngineeringThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations