Skip to main content

Dementia: Trial Design and Experience with Large Multicentre Trials

  • Chapter
Clinical Trials in Neurology
  • 263 Accesses

Abstract

Dementia is common, being estimated to affect up to 50% of the population who are aged over 85 years [1]. Rarely, reversible causes, such as a frontal meningioma, normal pressure hydrocephalus or vitamin B12 deficiency lead to specific treatments. The majority of cases, however, are due to one of the neurodegenerative diseases, of which Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is by far the commonest. The identification of specific cholinergic deficits in the brains of patients with AD in the late 1970s and early 1980s provided considerable impetus to the hope that treatment for the dementias might be possible [2,3]. The development and expansion of world-wide drug development programmes since that time have been dramatic, culminating in the licensing of tacrine in the United States in 1993 [4,5], and more recently, the approval of donezepil [6]. The diseases that cause dementia are defined neuropathologically, yet in life the diagnosis can usually only be made clinically. Moreover, the considerable heterogeneity and broad spectrum of impairment that occurs is difficult to measure in a reliable way. From the earliest clinical trials in AD, drug regulatory authorities, and particularly the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have taken a proactive interest in the methodology being used to prove the efficacy of drugs treatments for dementia. This interest has ensured broad standardisation of clinical trial designs, and has promoted the development of standardised guidelines through processes such as the International Working Group on the Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines [7].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jorm AF, Korten AE, Henderson AS. The prevalence of dementia: a quantitative integration of the literature. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1987; 76: 465–479.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rossor MN, Garrett NJ, Johnson AL, Mountjoy CQ, Roth M, Iversen LL. A post-mortem study of the cholinergic and GABA systems in senile dementia. Brain 1982; 105: 313–330.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Perry EK, Tomlinson BE, Blessed G, Bergmann K, Gibson PH, Perry RH. Correlation of cholinergic abnormalities with senile plaques and mental test scores in senile dementia. BMJ 1978;ii:1457–1459.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charatan FB. New tacrine hopes for Alzheimer patients in US. BMJ 1994; 308: 999–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Knapp MJ, Gracon SI, Davis CS, Solomon PR, Pendlebury WW, Knopman DS. Efficacy and safety of high-dose tacrine - a 30-week evaluation. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1994; 8: S22 - S31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly CA, Harvey RJ, Cayton H. Treatement for Alzheimer’s disease raises clinical and ethical issues. BMJ 1997; 314: 693–694.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferris SH, Hasegawa K, Homma A, Khachaturian ZS, Post S, Rossor M, Whitehouse PJ. International efforts to improve Alzheimer disease treatment. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1995; 9: 181.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Summers WK, Viesselman JO, Marsh GM, Candelora K. Use of THA in treatment of Alzheimer-like dementia: pilot study in twelve patients. Biol Psychiatry 1981; 16: 145–153.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Summers WK, Majovski LV, Marsh GM, Tachiki K, Kling A. Oral tetrahydroaminoacridine in long-term treatment of senile dementia, Alzheimer type. New Engl J Med 1986; 315: 1241–1245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Division of Neuropharmacological Drug Producs Office of New Drug Evaluation (I) Center for Drug Evaluation and Review. An Interim Report from the FDA. New Engl J Med 1991; 324: 349–352.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ad Hoc Dementia Assessment Task Force. Meeting Report. Anti-dementia drug assessment symposium. Neurobiol Aging 1991; 12: 379–382.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leber P. Guidelines for the clinical evaluation of antidementia drugs. Rockville MD: US Food and Drug Administration, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rossor MN. Alzheimer’s disease. BMJ 1993; 307: 779–782.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. ( DSM-IV). Washington, DC: APA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984; 34: 939–944.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHughs P. The “Mini Mental State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–198.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Blacker D, Albert MS, Bassett SS, Go RCP, Harrell LE, Folstein MF. Reliability and validity of NINCDS-ADRDA criteria for Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Neurol 1994; 51: 1198–1204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Verhey FR, Lodder J, Rozendaal N, Jones J. Comparison of seven sets of criteria used for the diagnosis of vascular dementia. Neuroepidemiology 1996; 15: 166–172.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Antonuono P, Doody R, Gilman S, Huff J, Scheltens P, Ueda K, Khachaturian ZS. Diagnostic criteria for dementia in clinical trials. Position paper from the International Working Group on Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1997; 11 (53): 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, Cummings JL, Masdeu JC, Garcia JH, et al. Vascular Dementia: Diagnostic criteria for research studies. Report of the NINDS-AIREN International Workshop. Neurology 1993; 43: 250–260.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McKeith IG, Perry RH, Fairbairn AF, Jabeen S, Perry EK. Operational criteria for senile dementia of Lewy body type (SDLT). Psychol Med 1992; 22: 911–922.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Perry EK, Haroutunian V, Davis KL, Levy R, Lantos P, Bagger S, et al. Neocortical cholinergic activities differentiate Lewy body dementia from classical Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroreport 1994; 5: 747–749.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Levy R, Eagger S, Griffiths M, Perry E, Honavar M, Dean A, Lantos P. Lewy bodies and response to tacrine in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 1994; 343: 176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. The Lund and Manchester Groups. Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57: 416–418.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gustafson L. Frontal lobe degeneration of non-Alzheimer type II. Clinical picture and differential diagnosis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1987; 6: 209–223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Neary D, Snowden JS, Mann DM. The clinical pathological correlates of lobar atrophy. Dementia 1993; 4: 154–159.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. CPMP Working Party on Efficacy of Medicinal Products. Anti-dementia Medicinal Products. Commission of the European Communities, 111/3705–91-EN, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bagger SA, Morant NJ, Levy R. Parallel group analysis of the effects of tacrine versus placebo in Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia 1991; 2: 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Eagger SA, Levy R, Sahakian BJ. Tacrine in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 1991; 338: 50–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mohr E, Feldman H, Gauthier S. Canadian guidelines for the development of antidementia therapies: a conceptual summary. Can J Neurol Sci 1995; 22: 62–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kameyama M, Ito E, Otomo E, Kogure K, Goto H, Sawada T, et al. Guideline on clinical evaluation of cerebral circulation and metabolism improvers. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bodick N, Forette F, Hadler D, Harvey RJ, McKeith I, Riekkinen P, et al. Protocols to demonstrate slowing of disease progression. Position paper from the International Working Group on Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1997; 11 (S3): 50–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Leber P. Observations and suggestions on antidementia drug development. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1996; 10.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thal L, Carta A, Doody R, Leber P, Mohs R, Schneider L, et al. Report of the working group on prevention protocols for Alzheimer’s disease. Position paper from the International Working Group on Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1997; 11 (53): 46–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ferris S. Report of the working group on clinical global measures. Position paper from the International Working Group on Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1997; 11 (53): 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, et al. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 1982; 140: 566–572.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Reisberg B, Ferris SH, de Leon MJ, Crook T. The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. Am J Psychiatry 1982; 139: 1136–1139.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Guy W. Clinical Global Impressions (CGI). In: Anonymous ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1976: 218–222.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shader RI, Harmatz JS, Salzman C. A new scale for clinical assessment in geriatric populations: Sandoz Clinical Assessment-Geriatric (SCAG). J Am Geriatr Soc 1974; 22: 107–113.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Schneider LS, Olin JT. Clinical global impressions in clinical trials. Int Psychogeriatrics 1996; 8: 277–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Schneider LS. Validity and reliability of the Alzheimer’s Disease Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCSCGIC). Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1997; 11 (S2): S22 - S32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis K. A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 1984; 141: 1356–1364.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ferris S, Lucca U, Mohs R, Dubois B, Allain H, Erzkeit H, et al. Workgroup report: objective psychometric tests. Position paper from the International Working Group on Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1997;1 1(53):34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Simpson PM, Surmon DM, Wesnes KA, Wilcock GK. The Cognitive Drug Research Computerised Assessment System for demented patients: a validation study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1991; 6: 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Robbins TW, James M, Owen AM, Sahakian BJ, McInnes L, Rabbitt P. Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): a factor analytic study of a large sample of normal elderly volunteers. Dementia 1994; 5: 266–281.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. The World Health Organization Quality of Life - 100. Geneva: Division of Mental Health, WHO, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  47. EuroQol Group. A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 18: 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gray A, Fenn P. Alzheimer’s Disease: the burden of the illness in England. Health Trends 1993; 25: 31–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Post SG, Ripich DN, Whitehouse PJ. Discourse ethics: research, dementia, and communication. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1994; 8 (Suppl 4): 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Post SG, Whitehouse PJ. Dementia and the life-prolonging technologies used: an ethical question. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1992; 6: 3–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Good clinical practice for trials on medicinal products in the European Community. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP), EEC 111/3976/88-EN, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Guidelines on good clinical research practice. London: Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lawton M, Brody E. Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9: 179–186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Reisberg B. Functional assessment staging. Psychopharmacol Bull 1988; 24: 653–659.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Blessed G, Tomlinson BE, Roth M. Blessed-Roth Dementia Scale (DS). Psychopharmacol Bull 1988; 24: 705–708.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Spiegel R, Brunner C, Ermini Funfschilling D, Monsch A, Notter M, Puxty J, Tremmel L. A new behavioral assessment scale for geriatric out-and in-patients: the NOSGER (Nurses’ Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients). J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 339–347.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Gauthier L, Gauthier S, Gelinas I, McIntyre M, WoodDauphinee S. Assessment of functioning and ADL. Abstract BOOK of the 6th congress of the International Psychogeriatric Association 5–10 September, 1993: 9.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Teunisse S, Mayke M, Van Creval H. Assessing the severity of dementia. Arch Neurol 1991; 48: 274–277.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Patterson MB, Mack JL, Neundorfer MM, Martin RJ, Smyth KA, Whitehouse PJ. Assessment of functional ability in Alzheimer disease: a review and a preliminary report on the Cleveland Scale for Activities of Daily Living. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1992; 6: 145–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Dejong R, Osterlund OW, Roy GW. Measurement of quality-oflife changes in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Ther 1989; 11: 545–555.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Linn MW, Linn BS. The rapid disability rating scale: 2. J Am Geriatr Soc 1982; 30: 378–382.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Overall JE, Gorham DR. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychol Rep 1962; 10: 799–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hope T, Fairburn CG. The Present Behavioural Examination (PBE): the development of an interview to measure current behavioural abnormalities. Psychol Med 1992; 22: 223–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: cornprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology 1994; 44: 2308–2314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Allen NHP, Gordon S, Hope T, Burns A. Manchester and Oxford Universities Scale for the Psychopathological Assessment of Dementia (MOUSEPAD). Br J Psychiatry 1996; 169: 293–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Tariot PN, Mack JL, Patterson MB, Edland SD, Weiner MF, Fillenbaum G, et al. The behavior rating-scale for dementia of the consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152: 1349–1357.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Reisberg B, Borenstein J, Salob SP, Ferris SH, Franssen E, Georgotas A. Behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease: phenomenology and treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 1987; 48 (Suppl): 9–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Cohen Mansfield J. Reflections on the assessment of behavior in nursing home residents. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1994; 8 (Suppl 1): S217–22.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Alexopoulous GS, Abrams RC, Young RC, Shamoian CA. Cornell scale for depression in dementia. Biol Psychiatry 1988; 23: 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Fox NC, Cousens S, Scahill R, Harvey RJ, Rossor MN. Using serial registered brain magnetic resonance imaging to measure disease progression in Alzheimer disease: power calculations and estimates of sample size to detect treatment effects. Archives of Neurology 2000; 57 (3): 339–344.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Fox NC, Jenkins R, Leary SM, Stevenson VL, Losseff NA, Crum WR, Harvey RJ, Rossor MN, Miller DH, Thompson AJ. Progressive cerebral atrophy in MS: a serial study using registered, volumetric MRI. Neurology 2000;54(4):807812.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Harvey RJ. Modifying the Alzheimer’s disease process: establishing criteria for demonstrating a delay in disease progression. International Journal of Geriatric Psychopharmacology 2000; 2: 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Fox NC, Scahill RI, Crum WR, Rossor MN. Correlation between rates of brain atrophy and cognitive decline in AD. Neurology 1999; 52 (8): 1687–1689.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Fox NC, Warrington EK, Rossor MN. Serial magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral atrophy in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 1999; 353: 2125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harvey, R.J., Rossor, M.N. (2001). Dementia: Trial Design and Experience with Large Multicentre Trials. In: Guiloff, R.J. (eds) Clinical Trials in Neurology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3787-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3787-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-856-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3787-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics