Advertisement

Abstract

There are two main types of therapeutic electrical stimulation devices available for physiotherapeutic application: battery-operated units suitable for home and hospital use, and mains-operated units generally used in hospitals. Both are capable of delivering a current intensity sufficient to depolarise sensory and motor nerves. Furthermore, many different names are given to this therapy, which can cause confusion. At high intensity, these devices can be used to strengthen striated muscles in the management of stress incontinence,1 and normalise micturition reflexes in the treatment of detrusor overactivity and retention.2–5 The availability of home units has enabled daily or twice daily treatments, resulting in improved health gains.

Keywords

Electrical Stimulation Duty Cycle Pelvic Floor Muscle Stress Incontinence Pudendal Nerve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sand P, Richardson DA, Staskin DR et al. (1995)Pelvic floor electrical stimulation in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence: a multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173: 72–9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fall M, Lindstrom S (1991) Electrical stimulation. a physiologic approach to the treatment of urinary incontinence. Urol Clin N Am 18 (2): 393–407.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lindstrom S, Fall M (1983) The neurophysiological basis of bladder inhibition in response to intravaginal electrical stimulation. J Urol 129: 405–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vodusek DB, Light JK, Libby J (1986) Detrusor inhibition induced by stimulation of pudendal nerve afferents. Neurourol Urodynam 5: 381–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Plevnik S, Homan G, Vrtacnik P (1984) Short-term maximal electrical stimulation for urinary retention. Urology 24: 521–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eccles JC, Eccles RM, Lundberg A (1958) The action potentials of the alpha motoneurones supplying fast and slow muscles. J Physiol 142: 275–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eriksen BC, Bergmann S, Mjolnerod OK (1987) Effect of anal electrostimulation with the “Incontan” device in women with urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94: 147–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ohlsson B, Lindstrom S et al. (1986) Effects of some different pulse parameters on bladder inhibition and urethral closure during intravaginal electrical stimulation: an experimental study in the cat. Med Biol Eng Comput 24: 27–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sundin T, Carlsson CA (1972) Reconstruction of several dorsal roots innervating the urinary bladder. An experimental study in cats. 1. Studies on normal afferent pathways in the pelvic and pudendal nerves. Scand J Urol Nephrol 6: 176–84.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sundin T, Carlsson CA, Kock NG (1974) Detrusor inhibition induced from mechanical stimulation of pudendal nerve afferents. Invest Urol 11: 374–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vodusek DB, Plevnik S, Vrtacnik P, Janez J (1988) Detrusor inhibition on selective pudendal nerve stimulation in the perineum. Neurourol Urodynamics 6: 389–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Packman-Braun R (1988) Relationship between functional electrical stimulation duty cycle and fatigue in the wrist extensor muscles of patients with hemiparesis. Phys Ther 68 (1): 52–6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tulgar M, McGlone F, Bowsher D, Miles JB (1991) Comparative effectiveness of different stimulation modes in relieving pain. Part 1. A pilot study. Pain 47: 151–5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yamanishi T, Yasunda K (1998) Electrical stimulation for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 9: 281–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Webb R, Powell H (1992) Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with idiopathic detrusor instability. Neurourol Urodynamics 11 (4): 327–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dray A, Metsch R (1984) Opioid receptors and inhibition of urinary bladder motility in vivo. Neurosci Lett 47: 81–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang Y, Hassouna MH (1999) Electrical stimulation has no adverse effect on pregnant rats and fetuses. J Urol 162: 1785–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Laycock
  • D. B. Vodušek

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations