There are two main types of therapeutic electrical stimulation devices available for physiotherapeutic application: battery-operated units suitable for home and hospital use, and mains-operated units generally used in hospitals. Both are capable of delivering a current intensity sufficient to depolarise sensory and motor nerves. Furthermore, many different names are given to this therapy, which can cause confusion. At high intensity, these devices can be used to strengthen striated muscles in the management of stress incontinence,1 and normalise micturition reflexes in the treatment of detrusor overactivity and retention.2–5 The availability of home units has enabled daily or twice daily treatments, resulting in improved health gains.
KeywordsElectrical Stimulation Duty Cycle Pelvic Floor Muscle Stress Incontinence Pudendal Nerve
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Sand P, Richardson DA, Staskin DR et al. (1995)Pelvic floor electrical stimulation in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence: a multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173: 72–9.Google Scholar
- 2.Fall M, Lindstrom S (1991) Electrical stimulation. a physiologic approach to the treatment of urinary incontinence. Urol Clin N Am 18 (2): 393–407.Google Scholar
- 9.Sundin T, Carlsson CA (1972) Reconstruction of several dorsal roots innervating the urinary bladder. An experimental study in cats. 1. Studies on normal afferent pathways in the pelvic and pudendal nerves. Scand J Urol Nephrol 6: 176–84.Google Scholar
- 12.Packman-Braun R (1988) Relationship between functional electrical stimulation duty cycle and fatigue in the wrist extensor muscles of patients with hemiparesis. Phys Ther 68 (1): 52–6.Google Scholar
- 13.Tulgar M, McGlone F, Bowsher D, Miles JB (1991) Comparative effectiveness of different stimulation modes in relieving pain. Part 1. A pilot study. Pain 47: 151–5.Google Scholar
- 15.Webb R, Powell H (1992) Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with idiopathic detrusor instability. Neurourol Urodynamics 11 (4): 327–8.Google Scholar