Advertisement

Planning the writing

  • William F. Whimster

Abstract

How the results will be published should be at the back of the research worker’s mind all the time he is planning and carrying out the research, thus reducing the new effort required when the work is finished and the writing starts.

Keywords

Impact Factor Medical Writing British Psychological Society Pitman Medical Target Journal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert T. Winning the publications game. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes GA. Write for success: a guide for business and the professions. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. Calnan J, Barabas A. Writing medical papers: a practical guide. London: Heinemann, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. Chapman AJ. Assessing research: citation-count shortcomings. The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society 1989 August:336–44.Google Scholar
  5. Day RA. How to write and publish a scientific paper. 3rd edn. Cambridge-Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. Fishbein M. Medical writing: the technic and the art. 4th edn. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, 1972.Google Scholar
  7. Garfield E. Citation indexing. Its theory and applications in science, technology, and humanities. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. Glen JW. Bibliometric performance indicators: how their performance can affect the work of editors. European Science Editing 1990;41:3–4.Google Scholar
  9. Goodman NW, Edwards MB. Medical writing: a prescription for clarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. Hall GM. How to write a paper. London: British Medical Journal, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. Hawkins CF. Speaking and writing in medicine: the art of communication. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, 1967.Google Scholar
  12. Hawkins C, Sorgi M. Research: How to plan, speak and write about it. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. Lock S. Thome’s better medical writing. 2nd edn. London: Pitman Medical, 1977.Google Scholar
  14. Mullen PM. Performance indicators — is anything new? Hospital and Health Services Review 1985, July: 165–7.Google Scholar
  15. O’Connor M. Editing scientific books and journals. Tunbridge Wells: Pitman Medical, 1978.Google Scholar
  16. O’Connor M. Writing successfully in science. London: Harper Collins Academic, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Connor M, Woodford FP. Writing scientific papers in English. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1975.Google Scholar
  18. Simmonds D, Reynolds L. Data presentation and visual literacy in medicine and science. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1984.Google Scholar
  19. Simmonds D, Reynolds L. Computer presentation of data in science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989 (based on Apple Macintosh).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thorne C. Better medical writing. London, Pitman Medical, 1970Google Scholar
  21. Turk C, Kirkman J. Effective writing: improving scientific, technical and business communication. London: E & FN Spon, 1989.Google Scholar
  22. Woodford FP. Scientific writing for graduate students. New York: The Rockefeller University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • William F. Whimster
    • 1
  1. 1.The School of Medicine and DentistryKing’s CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations