Working by Walking Around — Requirements of Flexible Interaction Management in Video-supported Collaborative Work

  • Steinar Kristoffersen
  • Tom Rodden

Abstract

This paper considers the effects of video-based communication systems on individual, local mobility in the everyday, practical ‘space’ of work. The notion of video as a vehicle that transcends physical space in an unproblematic fashion is carefully considered. Previous academic research has emphasized how video can extend and enhance the working environment. We found, doing a focused ethnography in the Customer Service Centre of a large high street bank, that video, in a trade-off between ‘real’ and ‘virtual’ mobility, restricted the use of personal, workaday, physical space. Issues thus raised for the design of video-based communication systems are: physical mobility in workaday space during interactive sessions; modal and temporal switching between and within different media; articulating and supporting collaborative work with private activities; and, accommodating alternating tasks.

Keywords

video communication multimedia space mobility CSCW 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bellotti, V. & Sellen, A. (1993), Design for Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing Environments, in G. de Michelis, C. Simone & K. Schmidt (eds.), “Proceedings of ECSCW’93, the 3rd European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work”, Kluwer (Academic Press), pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
  2. Fish, R., Kraut, R., Root, R. & Rice, R. (1993), “Video as a Technology for Informal Communication”, Communications of the ACM 36 (1), 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E. & Chalfonte, B. L. (1990), The VideoWindow system in Informal Communications, in D. G. Tatar (ed.), “Proceedings of CSCW’90: Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work”, ACM Press, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  4. Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., Root, R. W. & Rice, R. E. (1992), Evaluating Video as a Technology for Informal Communication, in P. Bauersfeld, J. Bennett & G. Lynch (eds.), “Proceedings of CHI’92: Human Factors in Computing Systems”, ACM Press, pp. 3748.Google Scholar
  5. Hammersley, M. (1992), What’s Wrong With Ethnography?,Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (1993), Ethnography: Principles in Practice,Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Heath, C. & Luff, P. (1991), Disembodied Conduct: Communication through Video in a Multi-Media Office Environment, in S. P. Robertson, G. M. Olson & J. S. Olson (eds.), “Proceedings of CHI’91: Human Factors in Computing Systems ( Reaching through Technology)”, ACM Press, pp. 99–103.Google Scholar
  8. Heath, C., Luff, P. & Seilen, A. (1995), Reconsidering the Virtual Workplace: Flexible Support for Collaborative Activity, in H. Marmolin, Y. Sundblad & K. Schmidt (eds.), “Proceedings of ECSCW’95, the 4th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work”, Kluwer (Academic Press), pp. 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hughes, J., Kristoffersen, S., O’Brien, J. & Rouncefield, M. (1995), The Organisational Politics of Meetings and their Technology — Two Case Studies of Video Supported Communication, in “Proceedings of the First IFIP WG8.6 Working Conference”. Leangkollen, Oslo, Norway, 14th-17th October.Google Scholar
  10. Kristoffersen, S. & Rodden, T. (1995), Multimedia Support of Collaboration in a Teleservice Team, in H. Marmolin, Y. Sundblad & K. Schmidt (eds.), “Proceedings of ECSCW’95, the 4th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work”, Kluwer (Academic Press), pp. 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Root, R. W. (1988), Design of a Multi-Media Vehicle for Social Browsing, in D. G. Tatar (ed.), “Proceedings of CSCW’88: Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work”, ACM Press, pp. 25–38.Google Scholar
  12. Stults, R. (1988), Experimental Uses of Video to Support Design Activities, Technical Report SSL-89–19, Xerox PARC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steinar Kristoffersen
    • 1
  • Tom Rodden
    • 1
  1. 1.Cooperative Systems Engineering Group, Computing DepartmentLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations