Interactions Between Knowledge Sources in a Dual-route Connectionist Model of Spelling
It is now standard in the psychological literature to assume that the functional architecture for the system involved in spelling a word from memory uses two routes, a phonological route and a lexically based route. We describe a modular connectionist model based on this dual route architecture. Both routes in the model, tested in isolation, are able to simulate important aspects of the relevant psychological data. Some progress has been made towards combining the two routes into a single system. In attempting a coherent connectionist account, however, we are forced to address from first principles the difficult problem of the synchronisation and integration of information from each route into an output which combines the capabilities of both.
We believe that the interactions between cognitive modules may be more difficult to model than the modules themselves, and that connectionist approaches, by forcing these interactions to be addressed at a basic level, may help to focus attention on difficult problems of psychological modelling which might otherwise not be addressed.
KeywordsSerial Position Serial Order Grapheme Node Vowel Sound Lexical Route
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Chomsky, N. Syntactic Structures. Mouton: The Hague. 1957Google Scholar
- 4.Morton, J. The logogen model and orthographic structure. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive approaches in spelling. London: Academic Press. 1980Google Scholar
- 7.Alegría, J., & Mousty, P. On the development of lexical and non-lexical spelling procedures of French-speaking, normal and disabled children. In Brown, G. D. A., & Ellis, N. C., (eds.), Handbook of Spelling: Theory, Process and Intervention. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. 1994Google Scholar
- 8.Frith, U. Unexpected spelling problems. In Frith, U. (ed.), Cognitive Processes in Spelling. London: Academic Press. 1980Google Scholar
- 9.Wing, A.M., & Baddeley, A.D., Spelling errors in handwriting: A corpus and a distributional analysis. In Frith, U. (ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press. 1980Google Scholar
- 12.Houghton, G., Glasspool, D., & Shallice, T. Spelling and serial recall: Insights from a competitive queueing model. In Brown, G. D. A., & Ellis, N. C., (eds.), Handbook of Spelling: Theory, Process and Intervention. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. 1994Google Scholar
- 13.Houghton, G. The problem of serial order: A neural network model of sequence learning and recall. In Dale, R., Mellish, C., & Zock, M.(Eds.), Current Research in Natural Language Generation. London: Academic Press. 1990Google Scholar
- 14.Houghton, G. Some formal variations on the theme of competitive queueing. Internal Technical Report, UCL-PSY-CQ1. (May, 1994). Dept. of Psychology, University College London. 1994Google Scholar
- 15.Jonsdottir, M., Shallice, T., & Wise, R. Language-specific differences in graphemic buffer disorder. (Submitted)Google Scholar
- 17.Barry, С & Seymour, P. H. K. Lexical priming and sound-to-spelling contingency effects in nonword spelling. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1988; 40A (1)5–40Google Scholar
- 19.Zorzi, Houghton & Butterworth. Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connec-tionist “dual-process” model. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- 20.Caramazza, A. & Olson, A. Lesioning a connectionist model of spelling. A talk given at Venice III: Cognitive Neuropsychology and Connectionism. October 1988, Venice.Google Scholar
- 21.Sejnowski, T. J., & Rosenberg, C. R. NETtalk: A parallel network that learns to read aloud. In Anderson, J. A., & Rosenfeld, E. (eds.) Neurocomputing: foundations of research. 663–672. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1988Google Scholar
- 22.Hartley, Т., & Houghton, G. A linguistically constrained model of short-term memory for nonwords. (In submission).Google Scholar
- 24.Quinlan, P. T. The Oxford Psycholinguistic Database. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1993Google Scholar
- 26.Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. Center for Human Information Processing (Technical Report No. 99). 1980. Reprinted in revised form in Davidson, R. J., Schwartz, G. E., & Shapiro, D. (Eds.) Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4). New York: Plenum Press. 1986Google Scholar
- 27.Miikkulainen, R. Subsymbolic natural language processing: an integrated model of scripts, lexicon, and memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993Google Scholar