Hennessy-Milner Logic with recursion as a specification language, and a refinement calculus based on it
This paper is about specification and verification of processes, modeled as CCSagents.We show, by means of examples that Hennessy-Milner Logic (HML) with recursion is a suitable language for expressing implicit specifications. By extending this specification language with refinement operators, i.e. operators that describe the internal structure of a system, we obtain a calculus for stepwise refinement of agents from a specification in HML to a realization in CCS. The method is demonstrated by proving the alternating-bit protocol under weak assumptions about the unreliable media.
KeywordsSpecification Language Operational Semantic Observable Behaviour Great Solution Proof Rule
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- [BR83]S. Brookes and W. Rounds, Behavioural equivalences induced by programming logics, ICALP’83, LNCS 154, 1983.Google Scholar
- [GS84]S. Graf and J. Sifakis, A modal characterization of observational congruence on finite terms of CCS, ICALP’84, LNCS 172.Google Scholar
- [HM85]M. Hennessy and R. Milner, Algebraic laws for Nondeterminism and Concurrency, JACM 32 (1), (1985).Google Scholar
- [Koze82]D. Kozen, Results on the Propositional µ-calculus, ICALP’82, LNCS 140.Google Scholar
- [Lars86]K.G. Larsen, Context-Dependent Bisimulation between processes, Ph. D. thesis CST 37–86, University of Edinburgh, 1986.Google Scholar
- [LM86]K. G. Larsen and R. Milner, A Complete Protocol Verification using Relativized Bisimulation, R 86–12, Institute of Electronic Systems, Aalborg University Center.Google Scholar
- [Lars87]K.G. Larsen, Proof Systems for Hennessy-Milner Logic with Recursion, to appear in CAAP’88.Google Scholar
- [Miln80]R. Milner, A Calculus of Communicating Systems, LNCS 92.Google Scholar
- [Miln84]R. Milner, The calculus CCS and its evaluation rules, Seminar on Concurrency, CMU, LNCS 197.Google Scholar
- [Wins85]G. Winskel, A Complete Proof System for SCCS with Modal Assertions, Cambridge Computer Lab., Techn. Rep. 78, September 1985.Google Scholar