Advertisement

An Internal Language for Autonomous Categories

  • Ian Mackie
  • Leopoldo Román
  • Samson Abramsky
Conference paper
Part of the Workshops in Computing book series (WORKSHOPS COMP.)

Abstract

In this extended abstract we present an internal language for symmetric monoidal closed (autonomous) categories analogous to the typed lambda calculus being an internal language for cartesian closed categories. The language we propose is the term assignment to the multiplicative fragment of Intuitionistic Linear Logic, which possesses exactly the right structure for an autonomous theory. We prove that this language is an internal language and show as an application the coherence theorem of Kelly and Mac Lane, which becomes straightforward to state and prove. We then hint at some further applications of this language; a further treatment will be given in the full paper.

Keywords

Monoidal Category Linear Logic Internal Language Symmetric Monoidal Category Proof Term 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Abramsky. Computational Interpretation of Linear Logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 111:3-57, 1993. Earlier version appeared as Imperial College Technical Report DOC 90 /20, October 1990.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    H.P. Barendregt. The Lambda Calculus: Its Syntax and Semantics. North-Holland, revised edition, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Barr and C. Wells. Category Theory for Computing Science. International Series in Computer Science. Prentice Hall, 1990.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    N. Benton, G. Bierman, V. de Paiva, and M. Hyland. Term assignment for intuitionistic linear logic. Technical Report No. 262, University of Cambridge, August 1992.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. Berry and G. Boudol. The Chemical Abstract Machine. In Conference Record of the Seventeenth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 81 - 94, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Blute. Linear logic, coherence and dinaturality. Technical report, McGill University, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.-Y. Girard. Linear Logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 50 (1): 1 - 102, 1987.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    B. Jay. Languages for monoidal categories. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 59: 6185, 1989.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    B. Jay. A note on natural numbers objects in monoidal categories. Studia Logica, XLVIII: 389 - 393, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    G.M. Kelly and S. Mac Lane. Coherence in closed categories. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 1: 97 - 140, 1971.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Lambek and P.J. Scott. Introduction to Higher Order Categorical Logic. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics Vol. 7. Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. Mac Lane. Natural associativity and commutativity. Rice University Studies, 49: 2846, 1963.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. Mac Lane. Categories for the Working Mathematician. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1971.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    I.C. Mackie. Lilac: A functional programming language based on linear logic. Masters thesis, Department of Computing, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of London, September 1991.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. Milner. Functions as processes. In Proceedings of ICALP 90, volume 443 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 167-180. Springer-Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    R.A.G. Seely. Linear logic, *-autonomous categories and cofree coalgebras. In J.W. Gray and A. Scedrov, editors, Categories in Computer Science and Logic, volume 92 of Contemporary Mathematics, pages 371-382. American Mathematical Society, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© British Computer Society 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Mackie
    • 1
  • Leopoldo Román
    • 1
  • Samson Abramsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ComputingImperial CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations