• T. B. Hargreave
  • S. Nillson
Part of the Clinical Practice in Urology book series (PRACTICE UROLOG)


The intention of this chapter is to describe tests that are in routine use so that intelligent communication can take place between the seminology laboratory and the clinician. Full details of the various laboratory techniques have been published elsewhere; particularly recommended is the 1980 laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction, which may be obtained from the Special Programme of Research and Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organisation, 1211 Geneva 27 Switzerland. A fuller laboratory manual has been published by Hafez (1977).


Sperm Motility Male Infertility Semen Sample Penetration Test Conception Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander NJ (1981) Evaluation of male infertility with an in vitro cervical mucus penetration test. Fertil Steril 36: 201–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atherton RW (1975) An objective method for evaluation of Angus and Hereford bull sperm motility. Int J Fertil 20: 109–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aughey E, Orr PS (1978) An unusual abnormality of human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 53: 341–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blom E, Birch AA (1970) Ultrastructure of the ‘decapitated sperm defect’ in Guernsey bulls J Reprod Fertil 23: 67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dubois MP, Jorannet P, Berge В, Volochine С, Serres С, David G (1975) Méthode et appareillage de mesure objective de la mobilité des spermatozoides humaines. Physiol Biol Med 9: 19Google Scholar
  6. Hancock JL, Rollinson DHL (1949) A seminal defect associated with the sterility of Guernsey bulls. Vet Rec 61: 742–743Google Scholar
  7. Hafez ESE (ed) (1977) Techniques of human andrology. Elsevier, North HollandGoogle Scholar
  8. Hendry WF, Morgan H, Stedronska J, Scammell G, Chamberlain GVP (1978) The clinical significance of antisperm antibodes in male fertility: crossed hostility tests and prednisolone treatment. In: Cohen J, Hendry WF (eds) Spermatozoa, antibodies and infertility, Blackwell, Oxford, pp 129–138Google Scholar
  9. Insler V, Melmed H, Eichenbrenner I, Serr D, Lunenfeld В (1972) The cervical score. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 10: 323Google Scholar
  10. Janick J, Macleod J (1970) The measurement of human spermatozoa and motility. Fertil Steril 21:140–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jecht EW, Russo JJ (1973) A system for the quantitative analysis of human sperm motility. Andrologia 5: 215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kremer J (1965) A simple sperm penetration test. Int J Fertil 10: 209–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kremer J, Jager S (1976) The sperm-cervical mucus contact test: A preliminary report. Fertil Steril 27: 335–340Google Scholar
  14. Lacy D, Pettitt AJ, Pettitt JM, Martin BS (1974) Application of scanning electron microscopy to semen analysis of the subfertile man utilising data obtained by transmission microscopy as an aid to interpretation. Micron 5: 135–173Google Scholar
  15. Liakatas J, Williams AE and Hargreave ТВ (1982) Scoring sperm morphology using the scanning electron microscope. Fertil Steril 38: 227–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lofts В (1978) Testicular function: A comparative viewpoint. J R Coll Surg Edinb 23: 67–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Macleod J (1951) Semen quality in 1000 men of known fertility and in 800 cases of infertile marriage. Fertil Steril 2: 115–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Macleod J (1964) Human seminal cytology as a sensitive indicator of the germinal epithelium. Int J Fertil 9: 281–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Makler A (1979) Simultaneous differentiation between motile, nonmotile, live and dead human spermatozoa by combining supravital staining and multiple exposure photography. Int J Androl 2: 21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nilsson S, Edvinsson A, Bergman B, Steen Y (1982) Characteristics of donor semen and cervical mucus quality at the time of conception. Fertil Steril, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  21. Pederson H (1969) Ultrastructure of ejaculated human sperm. Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 94: 542–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Phillips DM (1972) Comparative analysis of mammalian spermatozoa populations. J Cell Biol 53: 561–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ross A, Christie S, Kerr MG (1971) An electron microscope study of a tail abnormality of spermatozoa from a subfertile man. J Reprod Fertil 24: 99–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rothschild N (1949) Measurement of sperm activity before artificial insemination. Nature 163: 358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schlenk W, Kahmann H (1935) Ein verfahren zur messung der spermatozoenberregung. Pfluegers Arch 236: 398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tauber PF, Zaneveld LJD, Propping D, Schumacher GFB (1975) Components of human split ejaculates. I. Spermatozoa, fructose, immunoglobulins, albumin, lactoferrin, transferrin and other plasma proteins. J Reprod Fertil 43: 249–267Google Scholar
  27. Titmar HG (1978) Seasonal fluctuation of condom retrieval. IRCS Med Sci 6: 135Google Scholar
  28. Tjoa WS, Smolensky MH, Hsi BP, Steinberger E, Smith KD (1982) Circannual rythm in human sperm count revealed by serially independent sampling. Fertil Steril 38: 454–459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. WHO (1980) Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction. In: Belsey MA, Moghissi KS, Eliasson R, Paulsen CA, Gallegos AJ, Prasad MRN (eds) World Health Organisation Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Press Concern, SingaporeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. B. Hargreave
  • S. Nillson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations