Advertisement

Surgical Emergencies: A New Learning Experience

  • P. R. Edwards
  • W. A. Corbett
  • M. J. Taylor
  • J. R. Coughlan
Conference paper

Abstract

It is unusual nowadays for an airline pilot not to have spent some time in a flight simulator. They are used not only in the training of new pilots but also to ensure that qualified pilots are maintained at the highest possible level of competence. These training aids are able to simulate most catastrophes that may occur in an aircraft and are capable of realistically exposing a pilot to these situations without either endangering a life or an aircraft. Some of the catastrophes simulated a pilot may rarely expect to be exposed to during a normal flying career, whereas others may be experienced quite a few times. A simulator is able to produce and reproduce potential disasters with ease such that the pilot gains experience of how to manage his aircraft in many dangerous situations without exposing it to real trauma. They are proving to be of great value and are being used by most of the major airlines of the world.

Keywords

Multiple Choice Questionnaire Airline Pilot Junior Medical Staff Major Airline Real Trauma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DeDombal FT, Leaper DJ, Horrocks JC, Staniland JR, McCann AP (1974) Human and computer-aided diagnosis of abdominal pain: further report with emphasis on performance of clinicians. Bri Med J 376-380Google Scholar
  2. Dickinson CI (1977) A computer model of human respiration. MTP Press Ltd, Lancaster, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Dugdale AE, Chandler D, Best G (1982) Teaching the management of medical emergencies using an interactive computer terminal. Med Educ 16: 27–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Entwisle G, Entwisle DR (1963) The use of a digital computer as a teaching machine. J Med Educ 38: 803–812PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Geddes C, Kendle KE, Selkirk AB, Walker W (1983) KEKEPI: a computer program for simulating the therapeutic responses of patients suffering from idiopathic epilepsy. Med Educ 17: 325–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoffer EP, Barnett GO, Farquhar BB, Prather PA (1975) Computer-aided instruction in medicine. Ann Rev Biophys Bioeng 4: 103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Murray TS, Cupples RW, Barber JH, Hannay DR, Scott DB (1976) Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical teaching. Lancet 1: 474–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Puig GA (1976) The training effectiveness of simulation. Proceedings of the first international learning technology congress and exposition in applied learning technology, vol. IV. Calspan Graphics, Buffalo, NY, pp 28–32Google Scholar
  9. Schwartz MW, Hanson CW (1982) Microcomputers and computer based instruction. J Med Educ 57: 303–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Simpson MA (1976) Computer assisted learning. Lancet 2: 859CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. R. Edwards
  • W. A. Corbett
  • M. J. Taylor
  • J. R. Coughlan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations