Skip to main content

Abstract

Chapters 2 and 3 have shown that neural networks can be employed to identify dynamic systems. The main advantages of neural networks over conventional identification methods include simplicity of implementation and good approximation properties [Warwick et aI, 1992]. In feedforward network based identification schemes, neural networks are used to represent the implied static mapping between the available input and output data. The network structures (number of layers and number of units in each layer) are predefined and remain unchanged both during and after training. Successful identification is often dependent on proper pre-estimation of the network structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barron, RL (1975) Learning networks improve computer-aided prediction and control, Computer Design, 14(8),65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, J.J. and Franklin, M.A. (1975) A learning identification algorithm and its application to an environment system, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 5(2), 226–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, A.H. and Lopez-Parodi, J. (1980) Deforestation and increased flooding of the upper Amazon, Science, 210(19), 1354–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht-Nielsen, R. (1990) Neurocomputing, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivakhnenko, AG. (1971) Polynomial theory of complex systems, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 12, 364–378.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kosko, B. (1992) Neural Networks and Fuzzy system, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, I.D. (1990) System identification and control design, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shrier, S., Barron, R.L., Gilstrap, L.O. (1987) Polynomial and neural networks: analogies and engineering applications, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, II, 431–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, K., Irwin, G.W., and Hunt, K.T. (eds) (1992) Neural networks for control and systems, Peter Peregrinus, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, S. (1985) Applied Lineal’ Regression, Wiley, New York, 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widrow, B. and Lehr, M.A (1990) 30 years of adaptive neural networks: perceptron, Madaline, and backpropagation, Proceedings of IEEE, 78, 1415–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widrow, B. and Stearns, S.D. (1985) Adaptive Signal Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimura, T., Deepak, D., and Takagi, H. (1985) Track / vehicle system identification by a revised group method of data handling (GMDH),International Journal of Systems Science, 16(1), 131–144.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pham, D.T., Liu, X. (1995). Modelling and Prediction Using GMDH Networks. In: Neural Networks for Identification, Prediction and Control. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3244-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3244-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-3246-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3244-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics