Abstract
This paper presents a series of experiments which compare boolean and ranked output retrieval systems. The scope of current experiments to evaluate these systems are considered and new analyses presented
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Al-Hawamdeh, S. and others. (1988) Best match document retrieval: development and use of INSTRUCT. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Online Information Meeting, Learned Information, 761-777
Al-Hawamdeh, S. and Willett, P. (1989) Paragraph-based nearest neighbour searching in full-text documents. Electronic Publishing, 2(4), 179-192
Bovey, J. D. and Robertson, S. E. (1984) An algorithm for weighted searching on a Boolean system. Information Technology, 3(2), 84-87
Cleverdon, C. (1984) Optimizing convenient online access to bibliographic databases. Information Services & Use, 4(1/2),37-47 (There is a typesetting error in Table 3 page 42 in the data used in Figure 1 here: Quorum total relevant level 4 should be 214 not 314)
Cleverdon, C. (1990) Letter to Online Review 14(1) 35-36
Day. S. R. (1991) (Unpublished Thesis)
Evans, L. (1981) An experiment: search strategy variations in SDI. in Sparck Jones, K. Ed. Information retrieval experiment. Butterworths. 285-315
Hartley, D. and Hallas, M. D. (1976) Search strategy variations in current awareness profiles in the field of chemistry. British Library Research and Development Department Report 5294, United Kingdom Chemical Information Service, Nottingham.
Hartley, RJ, Keen, E M, Large, J A and Tedd, L A (1990) Online searching: principles and practice. London, Bowker-Saur. 387p.
Keen, E. M. (1981) Laboratory tests of manual systems. in Sparck Jones. K. Ed. Information retrieval experiment, Butterworths. 136-155
Keen, E. M. (1991a) The use of term position devices in ranked output experiments. Journal of Documentation, 47(1), 1-22
Keen, E. M. (1991b) Query tenn weighting schemes for effective ranked output retrieval. In Online Information 91, Proceedings of the 15th International Online Information Meeting, Learned Information, 135-142
Keen, E. M. (l992a) Proximity searching in text retrieval systems. Journal of Infonnation Science, 18(2), 89-98
Keen, E. M. (1992b) Presenting results of experimental retrieval comparisons. Information Processing and Management, Special issue on evaluation issues in information retrieval, 28(4), 1992 (In press)
Keen, E. M. and Digger, J. A. (1972) Report of an infonnation science index languages test. 2 Parts, College of Librarianship Wales, Aberystwyth (also OSTI Report 5120)
Mohan, K. C. see AI-Hawamdeh, S. and others. (1988)
Mulhauser, G. (1985) Dawn of next generation infonnation retrieval. In Proceedings of the 9th International Online InfOlmation Meeting, Learned Infonnation, 365-371
Perry, S. A. and Willett, P. (1983) A review of the use of inverted files for best match searching in information retrieval systems. Journal of Information Science, 6, (2/3), 59-66
Robertson, A. M., Thompson, W., Vickery, A. and Willett, P. (1990) Effectiveness of retrieval in statistically-based rettieval systems. RepOIt to British Library Research and Development Depaltment. Depattment of Information Studies, University of Sheffield.
Robertson, S. E. and Thompson, C. L. (1987). An operational evaluation of weighting, ranking and relevance feedback via a front-end system. Department of Information Science, The City University. Report to the British Library Research & Development Department.
Robertson, S E and Thompson, C L. (1990) Weighted searching: the Cirt experiment, in Informatics lO, Aslib, 153-165
Salton, G. (1972) A new comparison between conventional indexing (Medlars) and automatic text processing (Smart). Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23(2), 75-84
Salton, G. (1975) Dynamic information and library processing. Prentice-Hall
Sparck Jones, K. and Bates, R. G. (1977) Research on automatic indexing 1974-1976,2 Vols., British Library Research and Development Report 5464, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 British Computer Society
About this paper
Cite this paper
Keen, E.M. (1993). Performance Comparisons of Boolean and Ranked Output Retrieval. In: McEnery, T., Paice, C. (eds) 14th Information Retrieval Colloquium. Workshops in Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3211-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3211-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19808-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3211-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive