Skip to main content

Performance Comparisons of Boolean and Ranked Output Retrieval

  • Conference paper
14th Information Retrieval Colloquium

Part of the book series: Workshops in Computing ((WORKSHOPS COMP.))

Abstract

This paper presents a series of experiments which compare boolean and ranked output retrieval systems. The scope of current experiments to evaluate these systems are considered and new analyses presented

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Al-Hawamdeh, S. and others. (1988) Best match document retrieval: development and use of INSTRUCT. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Online Information Meeting, Learned Information, 761-777

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hawamdeh, S. and Willett, P. (1989) Paragraph-based nearest neighbour searching in full-text documents. Electronic Publishing, 2(4), 179-192

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovey, J. D. and Robertson, S. E. (1984) An algorithm for weighted searching on a Boolean system. Information Technology, 3(2), 84-87

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleverdon, C. (1984) Optimizing convenient online access to bibliographic databases. Information Services & Use, 4(1/2),37-47 (There is a typesetting error in Table 3 page 42 in the data used in Figure 1 here: Quorum total relevant level 4 should be 214 not 314)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleverdon, C. (1990) Letter to Online Review 14(1) 35-36

    Google Scholar 

  • Day. S. R. (1991) (Unpublished Thesis)

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. (1981) An experiment: search strategy variations in SDI. in Sparck Jones, K. Ed. Information retrieval experiment. Butterworths. 285-315

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, D. and Hallas, M. D. (1976) Search strategy variations in current awareness profiles in the field of chemistry. British Library Research and Development Department Report 5294, United Kingdom Chemical Information Service, Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, RJ, Keen, E M, Large, J A and Tedd, L A (1990) Online searching: principles and practice. London, Bowker-Saur. 387p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, E. M. (1981) Laboratory tests of manual systems. in Sparck Jones. K. Ed. Information retrieval experiment, Butterworths. 136-155

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, E. M. (1991a) The use of term position devices in ranked output experiments. Journal of Documentation, 47(1), 1-22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, E. M. (1991b) Query tenn weighting schemes for effective ranked output retrieval. In Online Information 91, Proceedings of the 15th International Online Information Meeting, Learned Information, 135-142

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, E. M. (l992a) Proximity searching in text retrieval systems. Journal of Infonnation Science, 18(2), 89-98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, E. M. (1992b) Presenting results of experimental retrieval comparisons. Information Processing and Management, Special issue on evaluation issues in information retrieval, 28(4), 1992 (In press)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, E. M. and Digger, J. A. (1972) Report of an infonnation science index languages test. 2 Parts, College of Librarianship Wales, Aberystwyth (also OSTI Report 5120)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, K. C. see AI-Hawamdeh, S. and others. (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhauser, G. (1985) Dawn of next generation infonnation retrieval. In Proceedings of the 9th International Online InfOlmation Meeting, Learned Infonnation, 365-371

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. A. and Willett, P. (1983) A review of the use of inverted files for best match searching in information retrieval systems. Journal of Information Science, 6, (2/3), 59-66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. M., Thompson, W., Vickery, A. and Willett, P. (1990) Effectiveness of retrieval in statistically-based rettieval systems. RepOIt to British Library Research and Development Depaltment. Depattment of Information Studies, University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. E. and Thompson, C. L. (1987). An operational evaluation of weighting, ranking and relevance feedback via a front-end system. Department of Information Science, The City University. Report to the British Library Research & Development Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S E and Thompson, C L. (1990) Weighted searching: the Cirt experiment, in Informatics lO, Aslib, 153-165

    Google Scholar 

  • Salton, G. (1972) A new comparison between conventional indexing (Medlars) and automatic text processing (Smart). Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23(2), 75-84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salton, G. (1975) Dynamic information and library processing. Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparck Jones, K. and Bates, R. G. (1977) Research on automatic indexing 1974-1976,2 Vols., British Library Research and Development Report 5464, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 British Computer Society

About this paper

Cite this paper

Keen, E.M. (1993). Performance Comparisons of Boolean and Ranked Output Retrieval. In: McEnery, T., Paice, C. (eds) 14th Information Retrieval Colloquium. Workshops in Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3211-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3211-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19808-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3211-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics