Chronic Valvular Disease of the Heart

Part of the Treatment in Clinical Medicine book series (TC MEDICINE)


Chronic valvular disease is most commonly the result of rheumatic damage following single or repeated attacks of rheumatic fever. There is resulting rigidity or deformity of the valve cusps, with fusion of the commissures and shortening or fusion of the chordae tendineae of the mitral and tricuspid valves. This leads to valvular stenosis or incompetence, although both may coexist. Following rheumatic damage the mitral valve is affected alone in 50%-60% of cases; combined aortic and mitral involvement occurs in 20%, and aortic involvement in some 10%. The tricuspid valve is usually only affected in patients who also have aortic and mitral valve involvement (Reichek et al. 1973). Sixty per cent of patients who present with rheumatic valvular disease give a prior history of rheumatic fever. They may, however, present with cardiac murmurs found on routine examination. Follow-up is required by physical examination and serial X-rays, electrocardiograms and echocardiography. Cardiac catheterisation is indicated during assessment for surgery.


Atrial Fibrillation Pulmonary Hypertension Mitral Valve Mitral Regurgitation Tricuspid Valve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barlow JB, Pocock WA (1984) The mitral valve prolapse enigma two decades later. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 53: 13–17Google Scholar
  2. Bjork VG (1969) A new tilting disc valve prosthesis. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 3: 1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown AK, Anderson V (1981) M-mode and cross-sectional (2D) echocardiograms in the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. Eur Heart J 2: 147–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burch GE, De Pasquale NP, Phillips JH (1968) The syndrome of papillary muscle dysfunction. Am Heart J 75: 399–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpentier A, Deloche A, Hanania G, Furman J, Sellier P, Piwnisa A, Dubost C (1974) Surgical management of acquired tricuspid valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 67: 53–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen MV, Gorlin R (1972) Modified orifice equation for the calculation of mitral valve area. Am Heart J 84: 839–840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohn LH (1978) Surgical treatment of valvular heart disease. Am J. Surg 135: 444–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Copeland JG, Griepp RB, Stinson EB, Shumway NE (1977) Long term follow-up after isolated aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 74: 875–889PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Corrigall D, Bolen J, Hancock EW, Popp RL (1977) Mitral valve prolapse and infective endocarditis. Am Med J 63: 215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank S, Johnson A, Ross J (1973) Natural history of valvular aortic stenosis. Br Heart J 35: 41–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenberg BH, Hassie BM, Brundage BH, Botvinick EH, Parmely WW, Chatterjee K (1978) Beneficial effects of hydralazine in severe mitral regurgitation. Circulation 58: 273–279PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson AD, Engler RL, Le Winter M, Karliner J, Peterson K, Tauji IJ, Daily PO (1977) The medical and surgical management of patients with aortic valve disease. A symposium. West J Med 126: 460–470Google Scholar
  13. Lillehei CW, Kaster RL, Block JH (1971) Clinical experience with the new central flow pivoting disc aortic and mitral prosthesis. Chest 60: 298Google Scholar
  14. Mills P, Leech G, Davies M, Leatham A (1978) The natural history of a non-stenotic bicuspid aortic valve. Br Heart J 40: 951–957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morganroth J, Perlof JK, Zeldis SM, Dunkman WB (1977) Acute severe aortic regurgitation. Pathophysiology, clinical recognition and management. Ann Intern Med 87: 223–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mullin EM, Glancy DL, Higgs LM, Epstein SE, Morrow AG (1972) Current results of operation for mitral stenosis: Clinical haemodynamic assessments in 124 consecutive patients treated by closed commissurotomy, open commissurotomy or valve replacement. Circulation 46: 298–308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Oakley C, Docherty P (1976) Pregnancy in patients after valve replacement. Br Heart J 38:1140–1148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rapaport E (1975) Natural history of aortic and mitral valve disease. Am J Cardiol 35: 221–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reichek N, Shelburne JC, Perloff JR (1973) Clinical aspects of rheumatic heart disease. Progr Cardiovasc Dis 15: 491–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Samuels DA, Curfman GD, Friedlich AL, Buckley MJ, Austen WG (1979) Valve replacement for aortic regurgitation; long-term follow up with factors influencing the results. Circulation 60: 647-654PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Stinson EB, Griepp RB, Oyer PE, Shumway NE (1977) Long-term experience with porcine aortic valve xenograft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 73: 54–63PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Royal InfirmaryGlasgowScotland, UK
  2. 2.Stobhill General HospitalGlasgowScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations