The introduction of the 131 I-hippuran renogram by Taplin and his colleagues (Taplin et al. 1956) led to an initial surge of interest in the technique amongst urologists and nephrologists. This was short-lived, however, since the initial capabilities of the probe renogram could not match the aspirations and expectations of clinicians. The method remained a useful procedure in renovascular hypertension, and continued to find a place in the evaluation of obstructive uropathy in some centres, but in general there was a certain amount of disillusionment with nuclear medicine in urological investigation until the advent of the gamma camera.
KeywordsTransit Time Renal Pelvis Retention Function Differential Renal Function Renal Pelvic Dilatation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Gosling JA, Dixon JS (1978) Functional obstruction of the upper urinary tract. A histochemical and electron microscopic study. Br J Urol 50: 145–153Google Scholar
- Koff SA, Thrall JH, Keyes JW Jr (1979) Diuretic radionuclide urography: A non-invasive method for evaluating nephroureteral dilation. J Urol 122: 451–454Google Scholar
- Lawson RS, Brown NGJ, Dance DR, Diffey BL, Erbsmann F, Fleming JS, Houston AS, Tofts PS (1979) A multicentre comparison of techniques for deconvolution of the renogram. Communication to the British Nuclear Medicine Society, Seventh Annual Meeting, April 1979Google Scholar
- O’Reilly PH, Lupton EW, Shields RA, Testa HJ, Carroll RNP and Charlton-Edwards E (to be published) The dilated non-obstructed renal pelvis. Br J UrolGoogle Scholar
- Whitfield HN, Britton KE, Kelseyfry I, Hendry WF, Nimmon CC, Travers P, Wickham JEA (1977) The obstructed kidney: Correlation between renal function and urodynamic assessment. Br J Urol 49: 615–619Google Scholar