The introduction of the 131 I-hippuran renogram by Taplin and his colleagues (Taplin et al. 1956) led to an initial surge of interest in the technique amongst urologists and nephrologists. This was short-lived, however, since the initial capabilities of the probe renogram could not match the aspirations and expectations of clinicians. The method remained a useful procedure in renovascular hypertension, and continued to find a place in the evaluation of obstructive uropathy in some centres, but in general there was a certain amount of disillusionment with nuclear medicine in urological investigation until the advent of the gamma camera.
KeywordsHydrate Radionuclide Expense Washout Deconvolution
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Gosling JA, Dixon JS (1978) Functional obstruction of the upper urinary tract. A histochemical and electron microscopic study. Br J Urol 50: 145–153Google Scholar
- Koff SA, Thrall JH, Keyes JW Jr (1979) Diuretic radionuclide urography: A non-invasive method for evaluating nephroureteral dilation. J Urol 122: 451–454Google Scholar
- Lawson RS, Brown NGJ, Dance DR, Diffey BL, Erbsmann F, Fleming JS, Houston AS, Tofts PS (1979) A multicentre comparison of techniques for deconvolution of the renogram. Communication to the British Nuclear Medicine Society, Seventh Annual Meeting, April 1979Google Scholar
- O’Reilly PH, Lupton EW, Shields RA, Testa HJ, Carroll RNP and Charlton-Edwards E (to be published) The dilated non-obstructed renal pelvis. Br J UrolGoogle Scholar
- Whitfield HN, Britton KE, Kelseyfry I, Hendry WF, Nimmon CC, Travers P, Wickham JEA (1977) The obstructed kidney: Correlation between renal function and urodynamic assessment. Br J Urol 49: 615–619Google Scholar