Abstract
Housing is often identified as a core contributor to the UK energy concerns, with figures of 27% (Edwards and Hyett, Rough guide to sustainability, RIBA, London, 2002; Department of Energy and Climate Change, Digest of United Kingdom energy statistics, 2009) of the country’s CO2 emissions produced within the home. This concern has created a new perspective on housing design within Architecture and the Built Environment with an increasingly emphasis on technical efficiency. Intelligent solutions within housing environments are increasingly playing a sustainable role; phase change materials are now incorporated in paint and wall surfaces and reactive monitoring offers wider interactivity for homeowners. Whilst it may be easy to assume a trickle-down effect of these technologies in some form into mainstream housing, the sociological factors are also central to enabling sustainable results. In losing sight of this, many technically-oriented built environments have been significantly less efficient during their occupancy than predicted (Roy and Herring, Technovation J 27(4):194–203, 2007; Chappells and Shove, Build Res Inf 33(1):32–40, 2001). To compound this issue, much of sustainable architectural literature appears divided of their view of technologies to achieve sustainability; either overtly promoting technical solutions to solve sustainable agendas or pessimistically shows technological inclusion as a ‘doom-and-gloom’ scenario. This paper looks takes a more rounded open view, in examining intelligent technology beyond functional efficiency, and does not enter into the beneficial/detrimental debate of techno-centric sustainable design. This research will consider the inclusion of differing technologies within current sustainable projects. Examinations will relate the primary functions of the sustainable housing technologies alongside their social context to outline how these technologies can offer technical efficiency and wider social values. This work therefore highlights the need to explore intelligent technologies from a broader view of the overall environment and not simply secularly within a technical component or system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Edwards B, Hyett P (2002) Rough guide to sustainability. RIBA, London
Department of Energy and Climate Change (2009) Digest of United Kingdom energy statistics. DECC
Smith A (2003) Transforming technological regimes for sustainable development: a role for alternative technology niches? Sci Public Policy 30(2):127–135
Guy S, Moore S (2005) Sustainable architectures: cultures and natures in Europe and North America. Taylor & Francis, London
Rochracher H, Ornetzer O (2002) Green buildings in context: improving social learning processes between users and producers. Built Environ J 28(1):73–84
Guy S, Shove E (2000) A sociology of energy, buildings and the environment. Routledge, London
Macnagton P, Urry J (1998) Contested natures. Sage Publishers, London
Mallett S (2004) Understanding home. Sociological Rev 52(1):62–89
Feenberg A (1999) Questioning technology. Routledge, London
Feenberg A (2005) Critical theory of technology. Tailoring Biotechnol 1(1):47–64
Heidegger M (1977) The Question concerning Technology (trans: Lovitt W). Harper Row, New York
Habermas J (1970) Technology and science as ‘Ideology’, in towards a rational society. Beacon Press, Boston
Veak T (2006) Democratizing technology. Suny Press, New York
Feenberg A, Feng P (2008) Thinking about design: critical theory of technology and the design process. In: Vermaas PE et al (eds) Philosophy and design. Springer, Berlin
Williamson T, Radford A, Bennetts H (2003) Understanding sustainable architecture. Taylor & Francis, London
Latour B (1993) We have never been modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York
Bijker W, Hugher T, Pinch T (1989) The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge
MacKenzie D, Wajcman J (1999) The social shaping of technology. OUP, Oxford
Norman D (2004) Emotional design. Basic Books, New York
Ball AD, Tasaki LH (1992) The role and measurement of attachment in consumer behaviour. J Consum Psychol 1(2):155–172
Kleine SS, Kleine RE, Allen CT (1995) How is a possession “me” or “not me”? J Consum Res 22(3):327–343
Till J (2009) Architecture depends. MIT Press, Cambridge
Rybczynski W (1987) Home: a short history of an Idea. Penguin Books Ltd, Baltimore
Harris H (2010) Conquering winter: US consumers and the cast-iron stove. In: Shove E, Chappells H, Lutzenhiser L (eds) Comfort in a low carbon society. Routledge, London
Daly G, Daly G (1996) Homeless: policies, strategies, and lives on the street. Routledge, London
Danby M (1993) Privacy as a culturally related factor in built form. In: Framer & Louv (1993) Companion of contemporary architectural thought, Routledge, London
Acknowledgments
This paper acknowledges the help and guidance from Graham Farmer of the University of Newcastle and Michael Stacey of the University of Nottingham.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marsh, P. (2012). Intelligent Housing for People and Technology: Examining Sustainable Housing Beyond the Technical and the Opportunities for Design. In: Breedon, P. (eds) Smart Design. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2975-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2975-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2974-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2975-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)