Overview of Guidelines and Appropriate Use Criteria

  • Katarina H. Nelson
  • Robert C. Hendel
  • Robert C. Hendel
Chapter

Abstract

Cardiac radionuclide imaging (RNI) provides critical diagnostic information, data for risk stratification and might be the key element in medical decision-making. Advances in imaging technology, in addition to expanded clinical applications along with possible financial incentives to the imager, have led to explosive growth of imaging, raising concerns about over-utilization. Inappropriate use of RNI may be harmful to patients and generate unwarranted cost to the healthcare system, whereas appropriate procedures should likely improve patients’ clinical outcomes. As a response to a rational use of imaging services, different guidance documents have been developed. These publications strive to help to eliminate unnecessary testing and promote increased awareness of health care costs.

Keywords

Explosive Radionuclide Stratification 

References

  1. 1.
    Hendel RC. Utilization management of cardiovascular imaging: pre-certification and appropriateness. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:241–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hendel RC. Why quality in imaging is critical to patient outcomes. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:325–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gibbons R, Eckel R, Jacobs AK. The utilization of cardiac imaging. Circulation. 2006;113:1715–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Circulation. 2009;199:e561–87.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging – executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association; American Society for Nuclear Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(7):1318–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(25):e50–e103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Appropriateness use criteria for radionuclide imaging for i-phones. 2010. http://www.­astellasapps.com/. Accessed 18 Sept 2010.
  9. 9.
    Hendel RC, Cerqueira M, Douglas PS, et al. A multicenter assessment of the use of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with appropriateness criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(2):156–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mehta R, Ward RP, Chandra S, et al. Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Nuclear Cardiology appropriateness criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15(3):337–44. Epub 2008 Apr 16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gibbons RJ, Miller TD, Hodge D, et al. Application of appropriateness criteria to stress single-photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies and stress echocardiograms in an academic medical center. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(13):1283–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hendel RC, Abbott BG, Bateman TM, et al. The role of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging for asymptomatic individuals. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18(1):3–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Antman EM, Peterson ED. Tools for guiding clinical practice from the American Heart Association and the American college of cardiology: what are they and how should clinicians use them? Circulation. 2009;119(9):1330–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katarina H. Nelson
    • 1
  • Robert C. Hendel
    • 2
  • Robert C. Hendel
    • 3
  1. 1.Cardiovascular DivisionUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Cardiac Imaging and Outpatient Services, Cardiovascular Division, Department of MedicineUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Cardiac Care UnitUniversity of Miami HospitalMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations