Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alani, H., Brewster, C., Shadbolt, N.: Ranking ontologies with AKTiveRank. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwab, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Argyris, C., Schön, D.: Organisational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison Wesley, Reading (1973)
Batini, C., Scannapieco, M.: Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. Springer, Berlin/New York (2006)
Berners-Lee, T., Handler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Sci. Am. 284(5), 34–43 (2001)
Bertin, J.: Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison (1983)
Boland, R.J., Tenkasi, R.V.: Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organ. Sci. 6(4), 350–372 (1995)
Brewster, C., Alani, H., Dasmahapatra, S., Wilks, Y.: Data driven ontology evaluation. In: International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal (2004)
Buitelaar, P., Eigner, T., Declerck, T.: OntoSelect: a dynamic ontology library with support for ontology selection. In: Proceedings of the Demo Session at ISWC 2004, Hiroshima, Japan (2004)
Burton-Jones, A., Storey, V., Sugumaran, V., Ahluwalia, P.: A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies. Data Knowl. Eng. 55(1), 84–102 (2005)
Carlsen, S., Gjersvik, R.: Organizational metaphors as lenses for analyzing workflow technology. Paper presented at the GROUP ‘97 conference, Phoenix, 16–19 Nov 1997
Chandrasekaran, B., John, R.J., Benjamins, V.R.: What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Intell. Syst. 14, 20–26 (1999)
Davis, A.M., Overmeyer, S., Jordan, K., Caruso, J., Dandashi, F., Dinh, A., Kincaid, G., Ledeboer, G., Reynolds, P., Sitaram, P., Ta, A., Theofanos, M.: Identifying and measuring quality in a software requirements specification. In: Proceedings of the First International Software Metrics Symposium, Baltimore, pp. 141–152 (1993)
Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., van Dongen, B., Käärik, R., Mendling, J.: Similarity of business process models: metrics and evaluation. Inf. Syst. 36, 498–516 (2010)
Fabbrini, F., Fusani, M., Gervasi, V., Gnesi, S., Ruggieri, S.: Achieving quality in natural language requirements. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Software Quality Week (QW’98) San Francisco, 26–29 May 1998
Fabbrini, F., Fusani, M., Gnesi, S., Lami, G.: An automatic quality evaluation for natural language requirements. In: Proceedings of REFSQ’01, Interlaken, Switzerland, 4–5 June 2001
Francalanci, C., Pernici, B.: View integration: a survey of current developments. Technical Report 93–053, Politecnico de Milano, Milan (1993)
Gane, C., Sarson, T.: Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1979)
Gangemi, A., Catenacci, C., Ciaramita, M., Lehmann, J.: Modelling ontology evaluation and validation. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 140–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Extending use and misuse cases to capture mobile applications. NOKOBIT – Norsk konferanse for organisasjoners bruk av informasjonsteknologi, pp. s. 1–s. 14 (2011)
Guarino, N., Welty, C.: An overview of OntoClean. In: Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 151–172. Springer, Berlin (2004)
Halpin, T., Curland, M.: Automated verbalization for ORM 2. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) Proceedings of OTM Workshop. LNCS, vol. 4278, pp. 1181–1190. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Hella, L., Krogstie, J.: A structured evaluation to assess the reusability of models of user profiles. Paper presented at the EMMSAD – conference on evaluating modeling methods in systems analysis and design, Hammamet, Tunis, 7–8/6 2010
Kindler, E.: On the semantics of EPCs: resolving the vicious circle. Data Knowl. Eng. 56(1), 23–40 (2006)
Krogstie, J., Jørgensen, H.D.: Quality of interactive models. In: First International Workshop on Conceptual Modelling Quality (IWCMQ’02). 11 Oct 2002. Tampere, Finland. Springer, Berlin (2002)
Lin, Y., Krogstie, J.: Semantic annotation of process models for facilitating process knowledge management. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des. 1(3), 45–67 (2010)
Lin, Y., Strasunskas, D., Hakkarainen, S., Krogstie, J., Sølvberg, A.: Semantic annotation framework to manage semantic heterogeneity of process models. Paper presented at the CAiSE’2006, Luxembourg (2006)
Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw. 11(2), 42–49 (1994)
Lozano-Tello, A., Gomez-Perez, A.: Ontometric: a method to choose appropriate ontology. J. Database Manag. 15(2), 1–18 (2004)
MacEachren, A.: How Maps Work. Guilford Press New York (1995)
Mendling, J., Reijers, H., Cardoso, J.: What makes process models understandable? In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Business Process Management, 5th International Conference, BPM 2007, Brisbane, Australia, September 24–28, 2007, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4714, pp. 48–63. Springer, Brisbane (2007a)
Mendling, J., Neumann, G., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Understanding the occurrence of errors in process models based on metrics. In: Meersman, T., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM Conference 2007, Proceedings, Part I. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4803, pp. 113–130. Springer, Berlin (2007b)
Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG). Inf. Softw. Technol. (IST) 52(2), 127–136 (2010)
Moody, D.L., Shanks, G.G.: What makes a good data model? Evaluating the quality of entity relationship models, in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Entity-Relationship Approach (ER’94), pp. 94-111, Manchester, England (1994)
Moody, D.L.: Metrics for evaluating the quality of entity relationship models. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Conceptual Modelling (ER ‘98), Singapore, November 16–19. Elsevier Lecture Notes in Computer Science (1998)
Moody, D.L.: The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2003, Naples, 16–21 June 2003
Moody, D.L.: The “physics” of notations: toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35, 756–779 (2009)
Morris, C.: Foundations of the theory of signs. In: International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, London (1938)
Nossum, A.: MAPQUAL: understanding quality in cartographic maps. Technical report, Norwegian Technical University of Science and Technology (2008)
Parsons, J., Wand, Y.: Choosing classes in conceptual modeling. Commun. ACM 40(6), 63–69 (1997a)
Parsons, J., Wand, Y.: Using objects for systems analysis. Commun. ACM 40(12), 104–110 (1997b)
Patel, C., Supekar, K., Lee, Y., Park, E.: OntoKhoj: a semantic web portal for ontology searching, ranking and classification. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Web Information and Data Management, pp. 58–61. ACM Press, New York (2003)
Pohl, K.: The three dimensions of requirements engineering: a framework and its applications. Inf. Syst. 19(3), 243–258 (1994)
Price, R., Shanks, G.: A semiotic information quality framework. IFIP WG8.3 International Conference on Decision Support Systems (DSS2004), pp. 658–672, Prato, Italy, 1–3 July 2004
Price, R., Shanks, G.: A semiotic information quality framework: development and comparative analysis. J. Inf. Technol. 20(2), 88–102 (2005)
Recker, J., Mendling, J.: On the translation between BPMN and BPEL: conceptual mismatch between process modeling languages. In: Latour, T., Petit, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the CAiSE Workshops at the 18th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2006), Luxembourg, Luxembourg, pp. 521–532. Presses Universitaries de Namur, Belgique (2006)
Rittgen, P.: Business process model similarity as a proxy for group consensus POEM 2011, Oslo, 2–3 Nov (2011)
Robinson, A., Sale, R., Morrison, J.: Elements of Cartography. Wiley, New York (1995)
Sampson, J., Krogstie, J., Veres, C.: Ontology alignment quality: a framework and tool for validation – International Journal on Information Systems Modeling and Design, 2(3) (2011)
Skupin, A., Fabrikant, S.: Spatialisation methods: a cartographic research agenda for non-geographic information visualization. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 30(2), 99–119 (2003)
Spyns, P., Reinberger, M.L.: Lexically evaluating ontology triples generated automatically from texts. In: Proceedings of ESWC 2005. LNCS 3532, pp. 563–577. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Strasunskas, D., Tomassen, S.L.: Empirical insights on a value of ontology quality in ontology-driven web search. Lecture Notes in Computer Science = Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol. 5332, pp. s. 1318–1336
Tartir, S., Arpinar, I., Moore, M., Sheth, A., Aleman-Meza, B.: OntoQA: metric-based ontology quality analysis. In: IEEE Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition from Distributed, Autonomous, Semantically Heterogeneous Data and Knowledge Sources, Houston, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 45–53 (2005)
Tsichritzis, D., Klug, A.: The ANSI/X3/SPARC DBMS framework. Inf. Syst. 3, 173–191 (1978)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow patterns. Distrib. Parallel Databases 14(3), 5–51 (2003)
Voss, A., Procter, R., Williams, R.: Innovation in use: interleaving day-to-day operation and systems development. In: Proceedings of the CPSR/IFIP WG 9.1 Participatory Design Conference, Nov 28–Dec 1, New York (2000)
Ware, C.: Information Visualization. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)
Wesenberg, H.: Enterprise modeling in an agile world. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Practice of Enterprise Modeling, Oslo, 2–3 Nov (2011)
Willoch, B.E.: Business Process Reengineering – En praktisk innføring og veiledning. Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad og Bjorke AS, Bergen (1994)
Zuboff, S.: In the Age of the Smart Machine. Basic Books, New York (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krogstie, J. (2012). Specialisations of SEQUAL. In: Model-Based Development and Evolution of Information Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2936-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2936-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2935-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2936-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)