Advertisement

Oil Tanker Economics: A Case of Oligopsony or of Perfect Competition?

  • Y. H. Venus Lun
  • Olli-Pekka Hilmola
  • Alexander M. Goulielmos
  • Kee-hung Lai
  • T. C. Edwin Cheng
Chapter
Part of the Shipping and Transport Logistics book series (STL)

Abstract

This chapter examines the economic structure and organization of the tanker industry, past, and present. It helps reader to understand the nature of the competition in the tanker industry. We therefore study: (a) the nature of the competition, (b) the structure of the industry, and (c) the practices adopted by oil companies as monopsonist in oil transport and as oligopolists in tanker ownership, and in the demand for tanker space. Many maritime economists believe that the supply of tankers operates under perfect competition. We may remember that ‘Pure competition’ means the complete absence of monopsony and monopoly or oligopoly and oligopsony, which means, therefore, that the tanker market is far from being purely competitive. According to economic theory, perfect competition implies perfect knowledge and frictionless capital mobility, neither of which is present in the tanker business either. Using Herfindahl index and the percent of world tonnage owned by the four biggest shipping companies, this paper shows that ownership is over-concentrated to be a competitive market. It is therefore concluded that the tanker market is monopsonistic.

Keywords

Spot Rate Spot Market Herfindahl Index Freight Rate Perfect Competition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arthur BW (1994) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical small events. In: Arthur WB (ed) Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Michigan University Press, Ann Arbor, ISBN 0-472-06496-7Google Scholar
  2. Beenstock M, Vergottis A (1993) Econometric modelling of world shipping. In: Motamen-Scobie H (ed) Chapman and Hall. Kluwer Academic Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg-Andreassen JA (1997) The relationship between period and spot rates in international maritime markets. Marit Policy Manag 24(4):335–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertrand J (1883) Review of cournot’s paper. J des Savants 68:499–508Google Scholar
  5. Besanko D, Dranove D, Shanley M, Schaefer S (2010) Economics of strategy. Wiley, New York. (Also 2004 edition)Google Scholar
  6. Bilas RA (1967) Microeconomic theory: a graphical analysis. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Binkley VD, Bessler DA (1983) Expectations in bulk ocean shipping: an application of autoregressive modeling. Rev Econ statistics 65:516–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BP (2008) Sustainability review. bp.com/sustainabilityGoogle Scholar
  9. Bulow J, Geanakopoulos J, Klemperer PD (1985) Multimarket oligopoly: a strategic substitutes and complements. J Pol Econ 93(3):488–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Button K (2005) Shipping economics: where we are and looking ahead from an institution economics perspective. Marit Policy Manag Int J 32(1):39–58 J-MMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chandler AD Jr (1990) Scale and scope: the dynamics of industrial capitalism. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and structure. MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Chamberlin EH (1933) The theory of monopolistic competition 7th edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass 1960Google Scholar
  14. Chen YS, Wang ST (2004) The empirical evidence of the leverage effect on volatility in international bulk shipping market. Marit Policy Manag 32(2):109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Couper A (1998) The crisis decades. Marit policy Manag 25(3):207–211 Editorial notes for the 25 years of the journalCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cournot A (1835, 1897) On the competition of producers, in research into the mathematical principles of the theory of Wealth, translated by Bacon NT. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Dikos G (2004) New building prices: demand inelastic or perfectly competitive? Marit Econ Logist 6:312–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dikos G, Markus HS (2003) The term structure of second-hand prices: a structural partial equilibrium model. Marit Econ Logist 5:251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dikos G, Sgouridis SP (2008) On the optimal timing of the oil pollution act: is there more value in waiting than acting? Int J Ocean Syst Manag 1(3):100–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dinwoodie J, Morris J (2003) Tanker forward freight agreements: the future of freight futures? Marit Policy Manag 30(1):45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dixit A, Pindyck R (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  22. Engelen S, Dullaert W, Vernimmen B (2009) Market efficiency within dry bulk markets in the short run: a multi-agent system dynamics Nash equilibrium. Marit Policy Manag 36(5):385–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans JJ, Marlow PB (1990) Quantitative methods in maritime economics, 2nd edn. Fairplay publications, SurreyGoogle Scholar
  24. Evans JJ (1994) An analysis of efficiency of the bulk shipping markets. Marit Policy Manag 21(4):311–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Evans JJ (1998) (Ed). Marit Policy Manag 25(4):1–3MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Farthing B, Brownrigg M (1997) Farthing on international shipping, 3rd edn. Lloyds of London Press, London. ISBN 1-85978-159-4Google Scholar
  27. Fisher F (1991) Industrial organization, economics and the law. MIT press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  28. Geithman H, Marvel F, Weiss L (1981) Concentration, price, and critical concentration ratios. Rev Econ Stat 63:349–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Georgantopoulos EA (1959) Sea transport. Leontis Editions, PiraeusGoogle Scholar
  30. Gilje TT, Dinwoodie J, Challacombe J (2002) Crude carrier consolidation and capital cost. Int J Marit Econ 4:35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glen DR, Martin BT (1998) Conditional modeling of tanker market risk using route specific freight rates. Marit Policy Manag 25(2):117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Glen DR (1990) The emergence of differentiation in the oil tanker market. Marit Policy Manag 17(4):289–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glen D, Owen M, Van der Meer R (1981) Spot and time charter rates for tanker 1970-1977. J Trans Econ Policy 1:45-58Google Scholar
  34. Goulielmos AM (2001) Matters of definition: maritime economics revisited, scientific yearbook in honor of late Professor D Kodosakis. Department of Business Administration. University of Piraeus, Greece, pp 211–228Google Scholar
  35. Goulielmos AM, Psifia M-E (2006) Shipping finance: time to follow a new track? Int J Marit Policy Manag 33(03):301–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goulielmos AM, Psifia M-E (2009) Forecasting weekly freight rates for one year TC 65,000 dwt bulk carrier, 1989–2008, using nonlinear methods. Int J Marit Policy Manag 36(4):411–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goulielmos AM (2005) Complexity theory: a science where historical accidents matter. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 14(4):533–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Goss RO (2002) An early history of maritime economics. Int J Marit Econ 4:390–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hawdon D (1978) Tanker freight rates in the short and long run. Appl Econ 10:203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heaver TD (1973) Commends in shipping management, In: Lorange P, Norman VD (eds) Institute Shipping Research. Bergen, Norway, Proceedings from a seminar in Bergen, August 23–26, 1972. Maritime Research Centre, The Hague, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  41. Henderson JM, Quandt RE (1958) Microeconomic theory: a mathematical approach. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Hicks JR (1946) Value and capital: an inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory, 2nd edn. Oxford at the Clarendon Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Hirshleifer J, Glazer A (1992) Price theory and applications, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall Int., Inc., New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  44. Intertanko (1996) Current issues facing the tanker industry. discussion paper, OsloGoogle Scholar
  45. Intertanko (2000) Key tanker market figures with focus on European trades. OsloGoogle Scholar
  46. ISM (Code) (2002) International safety management code, IMO, SOLAS Chapter IX, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Kavussanos MG (1996) Measuring risk differences among segments of the tanker freight markets, Discussion paper No 18, ICSTF. City University, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Kavussanos MG (2003) Time varying risks among segments of the tanker freight markets. Marit Econ Logistics 5:227–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kavussanos M, Alizadeh MA (2002) Seasonality patterns in tanker shipping freight markets. Econ Model 19:747–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan and Co Ltd, London, 1961 ReprintGoogle Scholar
  51. Koopmans TC (1939) Tanker freight rates and tankship building. In: De Erven F, Bohn NV Netherlands Economic Institute, Report no 27, HaarlemGoogle Scholar
  52. Kreps D, Scheikman J (1983) Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes. Bell J Econ 14:326–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lyridis DV, Zacharioudakis P, Mitrou P, Mylonas A (2004) Forecasting tanker market using artificial neural networks. Marit Econ Logist 6:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McConville J (1999) Economics of maritime transport: theory and practice. Witherby & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. McDonald M, Dunbar I (1995) Market segmentation: a step-by-step approach to creating profitable market segments. Macmillan Business, UKGoogle Scholar
  56. McGee JS (1958) Predatory price cutting: the standard oil (NJ) case. J law Econ vol. IGoogle Scholar
  57. Merikas AG, Merika AA, Koutroubousis G (2008) Modelling the investment decisions of the entrepreneur in the tanker sector: choosing between a second-hand vessel and a newly built one. Marit Policy Manag 35(5)Google Scholar
  58. Metaxas BN (1971) The economics of tramp shipping. The Athlone Press of the University of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Muth JF (1961) Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica 29:315–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Norman VD (1979) Economics of bulk shipping. Institute of Shipping Research Report, BergenGoogle Scholar
  61. OECD (1975) Maritime transport. France, ParisGoogle Scholar
  62. Pashigian BP (1995) Price theory and applications. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Pearson G (2009) The rise and fall of management: a brief history of practice, theory, and context. Ashgate Publishing Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Shefrin SM (1983) Rational expectations. CUP, UKGoogle Scholar
  65. Shimojo T (1979) Economic analysis of shipping freights. Kobe University, RIEBAGoogle Scholar
  66. Stigler G (1964) A theory of oligopoly. J Political EconGoogle Scholar
  67. Stopford M (2009) Maritime economics, 3rd edn. Routledge, Oxon. ISBN 978-0-415-27558-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Strandenes SP (1999) Is there potential for a two-tier tanker market? Marit Policy Manag 26(31):249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Strandenes SP (2002) The economics of the market for ships, in handbook of maritime economics and business. LLP, LondonGoogle Scholar
  70. Sutcliffe CUS (2006) Stock index futures, 3rd edn. Ashgate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. Svendsen AS (1958) Sea transport and shipping economics, as in Tinbergen, Republished by Bremen Institute for Shipping and LogisticsGoogle Scholar
  72. Thorburn T (1960) Supply and demand of water transport. StockholmGoogle Scholar
  73. Tinbergen J (1959) In: Klaassen LH, Koyck N, Wittereen HJ, Holland N (eds) A shipbuilding cycle? Weltwirtschaftliches Arciv 34:152–164Google Scholar
  74. Tsolakis SD, Cridland C, Haralambides HE (2003) Econometric modelling of second-hand ship prices. Marit Econ Logistics 5:347–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tsolakis SD, Hopp C (2004) Investment applications in the shipping industry. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual real options conference in Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  76. Varian HR (1990) Intermediate microeconomics: a modern approach, 2nd edn. Norton International Student Edition, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Veenstra AW, De La Fosse S (2006) Contributions to maritime economics-Zenonn S. Zannetos, The theory of oil tankship rates. Marit Policy Manag 33(1):61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Veenstra AW (1999) Quantitative analysis of shipping markets. Delft University Press Postbus, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  79. Wjilnost N, Wergeland T (1996) Shipping. Delft University Press, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  80. Wright G (2000) Spot and period rates in the Wet Bulk shipping market: testing for long-run parity. J Trans Econ Policy 34:291–300Google Scholar
  81. Zannetos SZ (1966) The theory of oil tankship rates, MIT monographs in economic. MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  82. Zannetos SZ (1973) Market and cost structure in shipping. In: Lorange P, Norman VD (eds), Shipping Management. Institute shipping research, Bergen, Norway (proceedings from a seminar in Bergen, August 23–26, 1972, Maritime Research Centre, The Hague, Netherlands)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. H. Venus Lun
    • 1
  • Olli-Pekka Hilmola
    • 2
  • Alexander M. Goulielmos
    • 3
  • Kee-hung Lai
    • 1
  • T. C. Edwin Cheng
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Logistics and Maritime StudiesThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong Kong SARPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Kouvola Research UnitLappeenranta University of TechnologyKouvolaFinland
  3. 3.Department of Maritime StudiesUniversity of PiraeusPiraeusGreece

Personalised recommendations