Advertisement

Deploying a Two-Player System for Arm Rehabilitation in Schools

Conference paper
  • 1.5k Downloads

Abstract

Cerebral Palsy (CP) is the commonest cause of disability among children in Europe (Johnson, 2002). Its effects and severity can be extremely varied, but a combination of arm impairments through weakness or spasticity and sensory deficits is common and can (i) significantly impair the ability of individuals with CP to carry out daily activities and (ii) create significant social barriers (Imms, 2008). Therapy is often used to aid the acquisition of motor skills, particularly in childhood, but a lack of physiotherapy resources means that this is often delivered through a self-managed home exercise programme. Exercises are frequently dull and repetitive, and children often lack the motivation to carry out these exercises, leading to poor compliance with the prescribed plan (Chappell and Williams, 2002).

Keywords

Cerebral Palsy School Environment Assessment Task Limb Rehabilitation Assistive Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chappell F, Williams B (2002) Rates and reasons for non-adherence to home physiotherapy in paediatrics. Physiotherapy 88(3):2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deutsch JE, Borbely M, Filler J, Huhn K, Guarrera-Bowlby P (2008) Use of a low-cost, commercially available gaming console (Wii) for rehabilitation of an adolescent with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther 88(10):1196–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Imms C (2008) Children with cerebral palsy participate: a review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil 30(24):1867–1884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jackson AE, Holt RJ, Culmer PR, Makower SG, Levesley MC, Richardson RC et al (2007) Dual robot system for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: the design process. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C :J Mech Eng Sci 221(7):845–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnson A (2002) Prevalence and characteristics of children with cerebral palsy in Europe. Dev Med Child Neurol 44(9):633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lanningham-Foster L, Foster RC, McCrady SK, Jensen TB, Mitre N, Levine JA (2009) Activity-promoting video games and increased energy expenditure. J Pediatr 154(6):819–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Malone TW, Lepper MR (1987) Making learning fun: a taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In: Snow RE, Farr MJ (eds) Aptitude, learning and instructions, vol 3., Cognitive and affective process analysesLaurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 223–253Google Scholar
  8. Read JC (2008) Validating the fun toolkit: an instrument for measuring children’s opinions of technology. Cogn Tech Work 10(2):119–128MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sandlund M, Mcdonough S, Hager-Ross C (2009) Interactive computer play in rehabilitation of children with sensorimotor disorders: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 51(3):173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sweetser S, Wyeth P (2005) Gameflow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. ACM Computers in Entertainment 3(3):3ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Weightman APH, Preston N, Levesley MC, Holt RJ, Mon-Williams M, Clarke M et al (2011) Home based computer-assisted upper limb exercise for young children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility study investigating impact on motor control and functional outcome. J Rehabil Med 43(4):359–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Engineering Systems and Design, School of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.A.P.H., School of Mechanical Engineering University of LeedsLeedsUK 
  3. 3.Academic Department of Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  4. 4.Institute of Psychological SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations