Female Genital Cutting: The Misnomer of Female Circumcision

  • Stephanya ShearEmail author
  • Laura Hart
  • Doug Diekema


This section will address the issue of female genital cutting, often referred to as female circumcision or genital mutilation. This section will describe the forms of female genital cutting, where it is practiced, the role of culture and beliefs about gender roles associated with the practice, efforts to restrict or eliminate the practice, and end with some thoughts on how Western medicine and culture think differently about male circumcision than female genital cutting.


Sexual Satisfaction Male Circumcision Female Genital Mutilation Urethral Stricture Female Circumcision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme. Female genital mutilation/cutting: accelerating change. 2008. Available at: Accessed Nov 2009.
  2. 2.
    Nour N. Female genital cutting: a persisting practice. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1(3):135–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cook RJ, Dicken B, Fathalla MF. Female genital cutting (mutilation/circumcision): ethical and legal dimensions. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;79:281–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Female genital cutting: a statistical exploration. New York: UNICEF; 2005. Accessed Nov 2009.
  5. 5.
    Cutner L. Female genital mutilation. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1985;40:437–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bell K. Genital cutting and western discourses on sexuality. Med Anthropol Q. 2005;19(2):125–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    World Health Organization. Female genital mutilation. 2005. Available at: Accessed Nov 2009.
  8. 8.
    Nour N. Female genital cutting: clinical and cultural guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004;59(4):272–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meniru Gl. Female genital mutilation (female circumcision). Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;101:832–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosenberg LB, Gibson K, Shulman J. When cultures collide: female genital cutting and US obstetric practice. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;111(4):931–4.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Straus L, McEwen A, Hussein FM. Somali women’s experience of childbirth in the UK: perspectives from Somali health workers. Midwifery. 2009;25:181–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    WHO Collaborative Study Group. Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome; WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. Lancet. 2006;367:1835–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chalmers B, Hashi KO. 432 Somali women’s birth experiences in Canada after earlier female genital mutilation. Birth. 2000;27:227–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vangen S, Elise RB, Johansen J, Sundby J, Træen B, Stray-Pedersen B. Qualitative study of perinatal care experiences among Somali women and local health care professionals in Norway. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;112(1):29–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mitike G, Wakgari D. Prevalence and associated factors of female genital mutilation among Somali refugees in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:264–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Afifi M. Women’s empowerment and the intention to continue the practice of female genital cutting in Egypt. Arch Iran Med. 2009;12(2):154–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    US Code 18 U.S.C. § 116: US Code – Section 116: Female genital mutilation. Accessed Nov 2009.
  18. 18.
    United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. NWAOKOLO vs IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE No. 02–2964. Petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals No. A27-226-360, 27 Dec 2002. Available at:,,USA_CA_7,,NGA,,47cfeb4b2,0.html. Accessed Nov 2009.
  19. 19.
    Darby R, Svoboda JS. A rose by any other name? Rethinking the similarities and differences between male and female genital cutting. Med Anthropol Q. 2007;21(3):301–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh-Grewal D, Macdessi J, Craig J. Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomized trials and observational studies. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90:853–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ostrom CM. Harborview debates issue of circumcision of Muslim girls. Printed in the Seattle Times, 13 Sept 1996.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ostrom CM. Is form of circumcision outlawed? – Procedure at harborview under review. Printed in the Seattle Times, 14 Oct 1996.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kelley T. Doctor fights ban on circumcising girls. Printed in the Seattle Times, 6 June 1996.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seattle Times Staff. Hospital won’t circumcise girls. Printed in the Seattle Times, 5 Dec 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southside Urology and NephrologyDanvilleUSA
  2. 2.SeattleUSA
  3. 3.Division of Bioethics, Department of PediatricsUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleUSA
  4. 4.Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Research InstituteSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations