Advertisement

A Comment on Informed Consent

Chapter

Abstract

Circumcision is an ancient procedure and, despite its long history, there remain significant doubts as to its medical benefits. Honest advocates on either side of this issue have to temper their enthusiasm based upon the lack of overwhelming medical evidence with which to definitively silence dissenters.

References

  1. 1.
    Bean G, Egelhoff C. Neonatal circumcision; when is the decision made? J Fam Pract. 1984;18:883–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tiemstra JD. Factors affecting the circumcision decision. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1999;12:16–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Svoboda JS, Van Howe RS, Dwyer JG. Informed consent for neonatal circumcision: an ethical and legal conundrum. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2000;17:61–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    American Academy of Pediatrics. Task force on circumcision. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 1999;103:686–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schoen EJ, Colby CJ, To TT. Cost analysis of neonatal circumcision in a large health maintenance organization. J Urol. 2006;175:1111–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urology Associates of North TexasFort WorthUSA
  2. 2.Cook Children’s HospitalFort WorthUSA

Personalised recommendations