Adult Circumcision

Chapter

Abstract

Adult circumcision is most often performed for true medical necessity, at least in Western societies. Although reported complications are few, they can be significant, and hence expertise is necessary. Unlike newborns, the adult will have already maximized his penile growth after puberty. Thus, it becomes more important to assure that adequate shaft skin is protected when doing a circumcision. There are many variations of available techniques and, hence, most urologists and surgeons will incorporate their own preferences when performing adult circumcision. Today, with more adults requesting foreskin preservation, prepucialplasties might be offered in select cases. Proper informed consent, of course, becomes essential.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization and Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety, and acceptability. 2007. http://www.malecircumcision.org/media/documents/MC_Global_Trends_Determinants.pdf. (accessed 11 Dec 2011).
  2. 2.
    DaiSik K, Myung-Geol P. The effect of male circumcision on sexuality. BJU Int. 2006;99:619.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nelson C, Dunn R, Wan J, Wei JT. The increasing incidence of newborn circumcision: data from the nationwide inpatient sample. J Urol. 2005;173(3):978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bromage S, Crump A, Pearce I. Phimosis as a presenting feature of diabetes. BJU Int. 2007;101:338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lisboa C, Ferreira A, Resende C, Rodrigues A. Infectious balanoposthitis: management, clinical and laboratory features. Int J Dermatol. 2009;48:121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards S. Balanitis and balanoposthitis: a review. Genitourin Med. 2006;72:155.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, Nalugoa F, Kiwanuku N, Moulton LH, Chaudhary MA, Chen MZ, Sewankambo NK, Wabwire-Mangen F, Bacon MC, Williams CF, Opendi P, Reynolds SJ, Laeyendecker O, Quinn TC, Wawer MJ. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2007;369:657.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambeko J, Sitta R, Puren A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ARNS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, Krieger JN, Williams CF, Campbell RT, Ndinya-Achola JO. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369:643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patterson BK, Landay A, Siegel JN, Flener Z, Pessis D, Chaviano A, Bailey RC. Susceptibility to human immuno deficiency virus-1 infection of the human foreskin and cervical tissue grown in explant culture. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:867.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hussain LA, Lehner T. Comparative investigation of Langerhan’s cells and potential receptors for HIV in oral, genitourinary, and rectal epithelia. Immunology. 1995;85:475.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCoombe SG, Short RV. Potential HIV-1 target cells in the human penis. AIDS. 2006;20:1491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siegfried N, Muller M, Deeks JJ, Volmink J. Male circumcision for the prevention of heterosexual acquisition of HIV in men (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(2):CD003362.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mehta SD, Gray RH, Auvert B, Moses S, Kigozi G, Taljaard D, Puren A, Agot K, Serwadda D, Parker CB, Wawer MJ, Bailey RC. Does sex in the early period after circumcision increase HIV seroconversion risk? Pooled analysis of adult male circumcision clinical trials. AIDS. 2009;23:1557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Auvert B, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Cutler E, Nieuwoudt M, Lissouba P, Puren A, Taljaard D. Effect of male circumcision on the prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus in young men: results of a randomized controlled trial conducted in Orange Farm, South Africa. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tobian AA, Serwadda D, Quinn TC, Kigozi G, Gravitt PE, Laeyendecker O, Charvat B, Ssempijja V, Riedesel M, Oliver AE, Nowak RG, Moulton LH, Chen MZ, Reynolds SJ, Wawer MJ, Gray RH. Male circumcision for the prevention of HSV-2 and HPV infections and syphilis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mehta SD, Moses S, Agot K, Parker C, Ndinya-Achola JO, Maclean I, Bailey RC. Adult male circumcision does not reduce the risk of incident Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, or Trichomonas vaginalis infection: results from a randomized, controlled trial in Kenya. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Powell JJ, Wojnarowska F. Lichen sclerosis. Lancet. 1999;353:1777.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Das S, Tunuguntla HS. Balanitis xerotica obliterans – a review. World J Urol. 2000;18:382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bunker CB. Topics in penile dermatology. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2001;26:469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Velazquez EF, Cubilla AL. Lichen sclerosis in 68 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:1448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kulkarni S, Barbagli G, Kirpekar D, Mirri F, Lazzeri M. Lichen sclerosus of the male genitalia and urethra: surgical options and results in a multicenter international experience with 215 patients. Eur Urol. 2009;55:945.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Funaro D. Lichen sclerosis: a review and practical approach. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17:28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lukowsky A, Muche JM, Sterry W, Audring H. Detection of expanded T cell clones in skin biopsy samples of patients with lichen sclerosus et atrophicus by T cell receptor-gamma polymerase chain reaction assays. J Invest Dermatol. 2000;115:254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aslanian F, Marques M, Matos H, Pontes L, Porto L, Azevedo L, Filgueira A. HLA markers in familial lichen sclerosis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2006;10:843.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wenzel J, Wiechert A, Merkel C, Bieber T, Tüting T. IP10/CXCL10 – CXCR3 interaction: a potential self-recruiting mechanism for cytotoxic lymphocytes in lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. Acta Derm Venereol. 2007;87:112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sideri M, Origoni M, Spinaci L, Ferrari A. Topical testosterone in the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1994;46:53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hengge UR, Krause W, Hofmann H, Stadler R, Gross G, Meurer M, Brinkmeier T, Frosch P, Moll I, Fritsch P, Müller K, Meykadeh N, Marini A, Ruzicka T, Gollnick H. Multicentre, phase II trial on the safety and efficacy of topical tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of lichen sclerosus. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155:1021.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nasca MR, Innocenzi D, Micali G. Penile cancer among patients with genital lichen sclerosus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41(6):911.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kirya C, Werthmann MW. Neonatal circumcision and penile dorsal nerve block a painless procedure. J Pediatr. 1978;92:998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Long RM, McCartan D, Cullen I, Harmon D, Flood HD. A preliminary study of the sensory distribution of the penile dorsal and ventral nerves: implications for effective penile block for circumcision. BJU Int. 2010;105(11):1576–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Laffon M, Gouchet A, Quenum M, Haillot O, Mercier C, Huguet M. Eutectic mixture of local anesthetics in adult urology patients: an observational trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23(5):502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wessells H, Lue T, McAninch J. Penile length in the flaccid and erect states: guidelines for penile augmentation. J Urol. 1996;156:995–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lagarde E, Taljaard D, Puren A, Auvert B. High rate of adverse events following circumcision of young male adults with the Tara KLamp technique: a randomized trial in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2009;99(3):163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Williams N, Kapila L. Complications of circumcision. Br J Surg. 1993;80:1231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Black PC, Friedrich JB, Engrav LH, Wessells H. Meshed unexpanded split-thickness skin grafting for reconstruction of penile skin loss. J Urol. 2004;172(3):976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyCollege of Medicine, The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of UrologyUniversity of Washington, School of MedicineSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations