Business Process Interoperability Towards Quality Models

  • Frank-Walter Jaekel
  • Gorka Benguria
  • Giuseppe Tarsitano
  • Giacomo Aceto
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences book series (IESACONF, volume 5)

Abstract

Quality models are in many domains an important mean to ensure the interoperability of the processes of the contracted organisation with the requirements of the contracting party. The syncronization of the organisation processes with the requirements of the quality model is in many cases a challeging activity, this is even more challenging in those situations where organisations have to deal with multiple development processed and multiple quality models at the same time. The FACIT SME project addresses SMEs operating in the ICT domain in the management of their development processes together with their quality models. The goals are to facilitate the use of Software Engineering (SE) methods and to systematize their application integrated with the business processes, to provide efficient and affordable certification of these processes according to internationally accepted standards, and to securely share best practices, tools and experiences with development partners and customers. The paper focuses on the interrelating of different methods and best practices to create a knowledge base not only for knowledge exchange but also to support its usage. A related interoperability challenge is the correlation between different models and a semantic approach to handle this correlation.

Keywords

Quality model Enterprise model CMMI SPICE ISO 9001 SME Software engineering Cooperation Collaboration 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The research leading to these results has been developed in the context of the FACIT-SME project (www.facit-sme.eu) partly founded from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme managed by REA Research Executive Agency (http://ec.europa.eu/research/rea) ([FP7/2007-2013] [FP7/2007 - 2011]) under grant agreement n° 243695. The authors wish to acknowledge the Commission for their support. We also wish to acknowledge our gratitude and appreciation to all the FACIT-SME Project partners for their contribution during the development of various ideas and concepts presented in this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    ISO/IEC TR 24774:2010: Systems and software engineering - Life cycle management - Guidelines for process description. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2010). http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=53815.
  2. 2.
    ISO/IEC 12207:2008: Systems and software engineering -- Software life cycle processes. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2008). http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=43447.
  3. 3.
    ISO/IEC 15504-5:2006: Information technology -- Process Assessment -- Part 5: An exemplar Process Assessment Model. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2008). http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=38934.
  4. 4.
    Cesar Gonzalez-Perez: Supporting situational method engineering with ISO/IEC 24744 and the work product pool Approach - Situational method engineering: fundamentals and experiences: proceedings. ISBN 13.978-0-387-73956-5, 2007.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    AFWAL-TR-81-4023: ICAM Architecture Part II-Volume IV - Function Modeling Manual (IDEF0). Materials Laboratory, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433, June 1981.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Object Management Group: Software & Systems Process Engineering Meta-Model Specification. Version 2.0. OMG, 2008.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Object Management Group: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). FTF Beta 1 for Version 2.0. OMG Document Number: dtc/2009-08-14. Standard document URL: http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0 or http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?dtc/09-08-14.
  8. 9.
    OPF Metamodel. (html) http://www.opfro.org/ Retrieved 1 June 2010.
  9. 10.
    Spur,G;,Mertins,K.;Jochem,R.: Integrated Enterprise Modelling, Berlin, Wien, Zürich Beuth, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    European Software Institute, IT-Mark Method v2.0, September 2007.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    ISO TC176. DIS 9001:2000 Quality Management Systems - Requirement. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (1999).Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    CMMI Product Team. CMMI® for Development, Version 1.2. Carnegie Mellon University – Software Engineering Institute. Pittsburgh, USA (2006). http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/06tr008.pdf.
  13. 16.
    Riccardo Martoglia. Facilitate IT-Providing SMEs in Software Development: a Semantic Helper for Filtering and Searching Knowledge. SEKE 2011, DII – Department of Information Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  14. 17.
    ATHENA-IP: POP* Revised framework. Version 1.0. ATHENA-IP FP6-507849 public deliverable WD A1.8, April 14, 2006Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    ISO 19440:2007 TC 184/SC 5. Enterprise integration -- Constructs for enterprise modelling (2007).Google Scholar
  16. 19.
    IDS Scheer AG, Altenkesseler Straße 17, 66115 Saarbrücken. August 06.2010 http://www.ids-scheer.de/de/ARIS_Software_Software/7796.html

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank-Walter Jaekel
    • 1
  • Gorka Benguria
    • 2
  • Giuseppe Tarsitano
    • 3
  • Giacomo Aceto
    • 3
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute Production Systems and Design TechnologyBerlinGermany
  2. 2.TecnaliaZamudioSpain
  3. 3.JoinetBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations