Understanding ‘Manufacturing Intelligence’: A Precursor to Interoperable Manufacturing Systems
‘Manufacturing Intelligence (MI)’ is increasingly important for manufacturing industry. Despite the prevalence of the term, there is a lack of clarity regarding the definition of MI. This lack of clarity is a significant hazard to the development of MI capability due to the ambiguity it creates during interoperation. This paper applies structural analysis techniques to assess existing definitions of MI, and then produces an updated, clarified definition based on the latest technology trends and business requirements. Using this approach it has been possible to create model answers to the questions “ What is MI”, “What is its purpose” and “ What does a future state with MI look like”. The lightweight ontology of concepts relevent to MI that was used to generate these answers can be used to provide cross-domain comunication consistancy for interoperation and will provide a strong foundation from which to develop a heavyweight ontological model that can be used to test new MI systems for compliance and create a basis for the functional consistency which is required for interoperability.
KeywordsManufacturing intelligence MES Business intelligence
The author would like to thank the industrial subject matter experts for their time and support, without which this work would not have been possible.
- 1.American National Standards. ANSI/ISA-95.00.03-2005, Enterprise-Control Systems Integration Part 3: Activity Models of Manufacturing Operations Management. 2005.Google Scholar
- 2.American National Standards. ANSI/ISA-95.00.01-2000, Enterprise-Control Systems Integration Part 1: Models and Terminology. 2000.Google Scholar
- 3.Brown M. ‘Don't give me more data; give me more knowledge!’. Hydrocarbon Process 2007;87(4):19.Google Scholar
- 4.Gunendran AG, Young RIM. An information and knowledge framework for multi-perspective design and manufacture. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 2006 06;19(4):326–338.Google Scholar
- 5.Fulcher J. Just married: integration platforms plus automated mapping systems boost continuous-improvement efforts. Manufacturing Business Technology Vol 23 2005;23(9):46–47.Google Scholar
- 6.Toung E. Plant floor, enterprise intersect at ‘manufacturing intelligence’. Plant Eng 2006; 60(9):31–4.Google Scholar
- 8.Izza S. Integration of industrial information systems: from syntactic to semantic integration approaches. Enterprise Information Systems 2009 02;3(1):1-57.Google Scholar
- 9.A Platform for Smart Substations. Future Generation Communication and Networking (FGCN 2007); 2007.Google Scholar
- 10.Jacobson, S.F., & Eriksen, L. The Manufacturing Performance Dilemma, Part 1: Overcoming Visibility Hurdles With Enterprise Manufacturing Intelligence, Gartner, Stamford, USA. 2011.Google Scholar
- 11.Panetto H, Molina A. Enterprise integration and interoperability in manufacturing systems: Trends and issues. Comput Ind 2008 9;59(7):641-646.Google Scholar
- 12.Scholten B. MES Guide for Executives: Why and How to Select, Implement, and Maintain a Manufacturing Execution System. North Carolina, USA: ISA; 2009.Google Scholar
- 13.Jones S. Improve Your Business Decisions. Available at: http://www.pcpro.co.uk/business-intelligence/research. Accessed 5/8/2011, 2011.
- 14.Industrial experiences, trends and future requirements on agent-based intelligent automation. IECON 02 [Industrial Electronics Society, IEEE 2002 28th Annual Conference of the]; 2002.Google Scholar