A Semantic Platform for Enterprise Knowledge Interoperability

Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences book series (IESACONF, volume 5)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a semantic platform based on knowledge interoperability services in order to promote business in enterprises as well as adjust their needs according to the recurrent changes in the business and exploit new opportunities. The main goal of the knowledge interoperability services is to realize efficient collaboration and cooperation in an enterprise cluster by identifying the key competences and skills of each enterprise, in order to fulfil emerging business opportunities. Our proposed platform is defined by three main services: the Social Ontology Building and Evolution service addressed to build a reference ontology (RO) about enterprise competencies with the support of knowledge extraction facilities and social participation of domain experts; the Enterprise Semantic Profiling service conceived to define profiles of enterprises in terms of the RO; the Enterprise Semantic Matchmaking service which implements a semantic similarity method operating on the defined profiles. The proposed platform is designed and realized in the context of the IP European project COIN (COllaboration and INteroperability in networked enterprise).

Keywords

Enterprise interoperability Ontology Semantic profiles Similarity reasoning 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work has been partly funded by the European Commission through ICT Project COIN: Collaboration and Interoperability for networked enterprises (No. ICT-2008-216256). The authors wish to acknowledge the Commission for its support.

References

  1. 1.
    Bechhofer S., Goble C. Towards Annotation using DAML + OIL. In Proc. of the Workshop on Knowledge Markup and Semantic Annotation (K-CAP2001), Victoria B.C.; 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Nicola A., Missikoff M., Navigli R. A software engineering approach to ontology building. Information Systems 2009; 34(2): 258–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Doerr M. The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Module: An Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata. AI Magazine 2003; 24 (3): 75–92.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Formica A., Missikoff M., Pourabbas E., Taglino F. Semantic Search for Enterprises Competencies Management. In the Proceedings of Int. Conf. on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development (KEOD), Valencia, Spain; 2010.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goh, S. Managing effective knowledge transfer: An integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management 2002; 6(1): 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gruber T. R. (1993) A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification. Knowledge Acquisition 1993; 5(2): 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gruninger M., Fox M. S. Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies. In Proc. of Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing in IJCAI 95, Montreal, Canada; 1995.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Handschuh S., Staab S., Volz R. On Deep Annotation. In Proc. of the International World Wide Web Conference (WWW-2003), Budapest, Hungary; 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khilwani, N., Harding, J A, Tiwari, M K. ECOS: Publishing the Published Competences. Proc. IMechE, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture 2011; 225(6): 921–942.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leung N. K. Y., Seung Hwan Kang, Sim Kim Lau, J. Fan. Ontology-based collaborative inter-organizational knowledge management network. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management 2009; 4: 37–50.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin D. An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity. In: Shavlik J. W. (ed.), Proc. of 15th the International Conference on Machine Learning, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, Morgan Kaufmann 1998: 296–304.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mentzas, G., Aposolou, D., Young, R., & Abecker, A. Knowledge networking: A holistic solution for leveraging corporate knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management 2001; 5(1): 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raskin V., Hempelmann C.F., Triezenberg K.E., Nirenburg S. Ontology in information security: a useful theoretical foundation and methodological tool. In Proceedings of the 2001 workshop on New security paradigms-NSPW'01, Cloudcroft, New Mexico 2001; 53–59.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shannon C. E. Prediction and entropy of printed English, The Bell System technical Journal 1951; 30: 50–64.MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tversky A. Features of Similarity, Psychological Review 1977; 84(4): 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uschold M., Gruninger M. Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. The Knowledge Engineering Review 1996; 11(2): 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Uschold M., King M., Moralee S., Zorgios Y. The Enterprise Ontology. The Knowledge Engineering Review 1998; 13: 31–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Velardi P., Navigli R., D'Amadio P.; Mining the Web to Create Specialized Glossaries. IEEE Intelligent Systems; 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research CouncilIstituto di Analisi dei Sistemi ed Informatica (IASI) “A. Ruberti”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations