CT Angiography of the Renal Arteries

  • Terri Jo VrtiskaEmail author


Imaging of the renal arteries using noninvasive tools such as high resolution CT angiography (CTA) has largely replaced catheter angiography in the assessment of a variety of clinical indications including depicting renal donor anatomic variation, assessing renal luminal abnormalities and demonstrating complex postoperative reconstructions. This chapter reviews the indications, techniques and applications for renal arterial CTA as well as presents future directions for state-of-the-art CT scanners and processing techniques.


Renal Arterial Computed tomography CTA 


  1. 1.
    Glockner JF, Vrtiska TJ. Renal MR and CT angiography: current concepts. Abdom Imaging. 2007;32:407–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zamboni GA, Romero JY, Raptopoulos VD. Combined vascular-excretory phase MDCT angiography in the preoperative evaluation of renal donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:145–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holden A, Smith A, Dukes P, Pilmore H, Yasutomi M. Assessment of 100 live potential renal donors for laparoscopic nephrectomy with multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology. 2005;237:973–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gluecker TM, Mayr M, Schwarz J, Bilecen D, Voegele T, Steiger J, et al. Comparison of CT angiography with MR angiography in the preoperative assessment of living kidney donors. Transplantation. 2008;86:1249–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pozniak MA, Balison DJ, Lee Jr FT, Tambeaux RH, Uehling DT, Moon TD. CT angiography of potential renal transplant donors. Radiographics. 1998;18:565–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pollak R, Prusak BF, Mozes MF. Anatomic abnormalities of cadaver kidneys procured for purposes of transplantation. Am Surg. 1986;52:233–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Safian RD, Textor SC. Renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:431–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Willmann JK, Wildermuth S, Pfammatter T, Roos JE, Seifert B, Hilfiker PR, et al. Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology. 2003;226:798–811.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rountas C, Vlychou M, Vassiou K, Liakopoulos V, Kapsalaki E, Koukoulis G, et al. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography. Ren Fail. 2007;29:295–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fraioli F, Catalano C, Bertoletti L, Danti M, Fanelli F, Napoli A, et al. Multidetector-row CT angiography of renal artery stenosis in 50 consecutive patients: prospective interobserver comparison with DSA. Radiol Med. 2006;111:459–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leertouwer TC, Gussenhoven EJ, Bosch JL, van Jaarsveld BC, van Dijk LC, Deinum J, et al. Stent placement for renal arterial stenosis: where do we stand? A meta-analysis. Radiology. 2000;216:78–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Manousaki E, Perisinakis K, Karantanas A, Tsetis D. MDCT angiography assessment of renal artery in-stent restenosis: can we reduce the radiation exposure burden? A feasibility study. Eur J Radiol. 2011;79:224–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steinwender C, Schutzenberger W, Fellner F, Honig S, Schmitt B, Focke C, et al. 64-Detector CT angiography in renal artery stent evaluation: prospective comparison with selective catheter angiography. Radiology. 2009;252:299–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beregi JP, Louvegny S, Gautier C, Mounier-Vehier C, Moretti A, Desmoucelle F, et al. Fibromuscular dysplasia of the renal arteries: comparison of helical CT angiography and arteriography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:27–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sabharwal R, Vladica P, Coleman P. Multidetector spiral CT renal angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia. Eur J Radiol. 2007;61:520–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Willoteaux S, Faivre-Pierret M, Moranne O, Lions C, Bruzzi J, Finot M, et al. Fibromuscular dysplasia of the main renal arteries: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2006;241:922–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, Maki JH, Leiner T, et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:674–82; discussion 682.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Youngberg SP, Sheps SG, Strong CG. Fibromuscular disease of the renal arteries. Med Clin North Am. 1977;61:623–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu PS, Platt JF. CT angiography of the renal circulation. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;48:347–65, viii–ix.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cragg AH, Smith TP, Thompson BH, Maroney TP, Stanson AW, Shaw GT, et al. Incidental fibromuscular dysplasia in potential renal donors: long-term clinical follow-up. Radiology. 1989;172:145–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Persu A, Touze E, Mousseaux E, Barral X, Joffre F, Plouin PF. Diagnosis and management of fibromuscular dysplasia: an expert consensus. Eur J Clin Invest. 2012;42:338–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lie JT. Segmental mediolytic arteritis. Not an arteritis but a variant of arterial fibromuscular dysplasia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;116:238–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Slavin RE, Saeki K, Bhagavan B, Maas AE. Segmental arterial mediolysis: a precursor to fibromuscular dysplasia? Mod Pathol. 1995;8:287–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Michael M, Widmer U, Wildermuth S, Barghorn A, Duewell S, Pfammatter T. Segmental arterial mediolysis: CTA findings at presentation and follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1463–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Filippone EJ, Foy A, Galanis T, Pokuah M, Newman E, Lallas CD, et al. Segmental arterial mediolysis: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;58:981–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kalva SP, Somarouthu B, Jaff MR, Wicky S. Segmental arterial mediolysis: clinical and imaging features at presentation and during follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:1380–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stawicki SP, Rosenfeld JC, Weger N, Fields EL, Balshi JD. Spontaneous renal artery dissection: three cases and clinical algorithms. J Hum Hypertens. 2006;20:710–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ozaki K, Miyayama S, Ushiogi Y, Matsui O. Renal involvement of polyarteritis nodosa: CT and MR findings. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34:265–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stanson AW, Friese JL, Johnson CM, McKusick MA, Breen JF, Sabater EA, et al. Polyarteritis nodosa: spectrum of angiographic findings. Radiographics. 2001;21:151–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stanley JC, Rhodes EL, Gewertz BL, Chang CY, Walter JF, Fry WJ. Renal artery aneurysms. Significance of macroaneurysms exclusive of dissections and fibrodysplastic mural dilations. Arch Surg. 1975;110:1327–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Henke PK, Cardneau JD, Welling 3rd TH, Upchurch Jr GR, Wakefield TW, Jacobs LA, et al. Renal artery aneurysms: a 35-year clinical experience with 252 aneurysms in 168 patients. Ann Surg. 2001;234:454–62; discussion 62–3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Eskandari MK, Resnick SA. Aneurysms of the renal artery. Semin Vasc Surg. 2005;18(4):202–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Morita K, Seki T, Iwami D, Sasaki H, Fukuzawa N, Nonomura K. Long-term outcome of single institutional experience with conservative and surgical management for renal artery aneurysm. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:1795–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tinkoff G, Esposito TJ, Reed J, Kilgo P, Fildes J, Pasquale M, et al. American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale I: spleen, liver, and kidney, validation based on the National Trauma Data Bank. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:646–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moore EE, Shackford SR, Pachter HL, McAninch JW, Browner BD, Champion HR, et al. Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma. 1989;29:1664–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Ernst RD, Tamm EP, Goldman SM, Fishman EK. CT evaluation of renovascular disease. Radiographics. 2000;20:1321–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sheth S, Scatarige JC, Horton KM, Corl FM, Fishman EK. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma: role of multidetector ct and three-dimensional CT. Radiographics. 2001;21 Spec No:S237–54.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kumar S, Neyaz Z, Gupta A. The utility of 64 channel multidetector CT angiography for evaluating the renal vascular anatomy and possible variations: a pictorial essay. Korean J Radiol. 2010;11:346–54.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ferda J, Hora M, Hes O, Ferdova E, Kreuzberg B. Assessment of the kidney tumor vascular supply by two-phase MDCT-angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2007;62:295–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Welch TJ, LeRoy AJ. Helical and electron beam CT scanning in the evaluation of renal vein involvement in patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21:467–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Graser A, Johnson TR, Chandarana H, Macari M. Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:13–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vrtiska TJ, Takahashi N, Fletcher JG, Hartman RP, Yu L, Kawashima A. Genitourinary applications of dual-energy CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1434–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Brockmann C, Jochum S, Sadick M, Huck K, Ziegler P, Fink C, et al. Dual-energy CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32:630–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thomas C, Korn A, Ketelsen D, Danz S, Tsifikas I, Claussen CD, et al. Automatic lumen segmentation in calcified plaques: dual-energy CT versus standard reconstructions in comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1590–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pinho DF, Kulkarni NM, Krishnaraj A, Kalva SP, Sahani DV. Initial experience with single-source dual-energy CT abdominal angiography and comparison with single-energy CT angiography: image quality, enhancement, diagnosis and radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2012;23:351–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cho ES, Yu JS, Ahn JH, Kim JH, Chung JJ, Lee HK, et al. CT angiography of the renal arteries: comparison of lower-tube-voltage CTA with moderate-concentration iodinated contrast material and conventional CTA. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:96–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Winklehner A, Karlo C, Puippe G, Schmidt B, Flohr T, Goetti R, et al. Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2521–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyMayo Clinic College of MedicineRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations