Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Low Carbon Ships and Shipping

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy, Transport, & the Environment

  • 3560 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the scope for increasing the energy efficiency and decreasing the carbon (and other GHG) emissions of ships and shipping. An overview of the fundamentals of the shipping industry is presented (why does shipping exist, how does demand develop, where do ships go, how is shipping structured, what are its impacts) to provide context for further detail on the energy efficiency, regulatory options and technology options that could be employed to help transition shipping to a low carbon future. Two specific examples of trends which could be important to this transition (an increase in ship size and a decrease in speed) are then analysed in greater detail to reveal their potential and also some of the practical implementation issues that will need to be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alvarez F, Longva T, Engebrethsen E (2010) A methodology to assess vessel berthing and speed optimization policies. Marit Econ Logist 12(4):327–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buhaug Ø, Corbett JJ, Endresen Ø, Eyring V, Faber J, Hanayama S, Lee DS, Lee D, Lindstad H, Markowska AZ, Mjelde A, Nelissen D, Nilsen J, Pålsson C, Winebrake JJ, Wu W-Q, Yoshida K (2009) Second IMO GHG study 2009, IMO London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borken-Kleefeld J, Berntsen T, Fuglestvedt J (2010) Specific climate impact of passenger and freight transport. Environ Sci Technol 44(15):5700–5706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carlton JS, Smart R, Jenkins V (2011) The nuclear propulsion of merchant ships: aspects of engineering, science and technology. Proc IMarEST Part A J Marine Eng Technol 10(2):47–59

    Google Scholar 

  5. Corbett JJ, Lack DA, Winebrake JJ, Harder S, Silberman JA, Gold M (2010) Arctic shipping emissions inventories and future scenarios. Atmos Chem Phys 10:9689–9704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Corbett JJ, Wang H, Winebrake JJ (2009) The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping. Transp Res D 14:593–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Det Norske Veritas (2009) ‘Pathways to low carbon shipping’

    Google Scholar 

  8. Devanney J (2010) The impact of bunker price on VLCC spot rates. The Center for Tankship Excellence, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Devanney J (2011) EEDI Absurdities. Center for Tankship Excellence, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dinwoodie J, Tuck S, Landamore M, Mangan J (2010) Slow steaming and low carbon shipping: revolution or recession. Logistics research network 2010 conference, Harrogate

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eefsen T (2010) Speed, carbon emissions and supply chain in container shipping. IAME 2010. Lisbon, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  12. Faber et al (2009) Technical support for European action to reducing greenhouse gas emissions from international maritime transport. CE Delft, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fuglestvedt J, Berntsen T, Eyring V, Isaksen I, Lee D, Sausen R (2009) Shipping emissions: from cooling to warming of climate and reducing impacts on health. Environ Sci Technol 42(24):9057–9062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kendall PMH (1972) A theory of optimum ship size. J Transp Econ Policy 1(2):128–146

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kesicki F (2010) Marginal abatement cost curves for policy making—Expert-based vs. model-derived curves. Energy Institute, University College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kristensen HOH (2010) Model for the environmental assessment of container ship transport. Trans Soc Nav Archit Mar Eng

    Google Scholar 

  17. IMO (2010a) Prevention of air pollution from ships. Information to facilitate discussion on GHG emissions from ships MEPC60/WP.5

    Google Scholar 

  18. IMO (2010b) Further improvement of the draft text for mandatory requirements of EEDI and SEEMP. EE-WG 1/2/1

    Google Scholar 

  19. IMO (2010c) Reduction of GHG emissions from ships MEPC61/Inf.18

    Google Scholar 

  20. IMO (2010d) Reduction of GHG emissions from ships—full report of the work undertaken by the Expert Group on Feasibility Study and Impact Assessment of possible Market-based Measures. MEPC 61/Inf.2

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maersk (2011) www.worldslargestship.com. Accessed 19 June 2011

  22. Ocean Policy Research Foundation (2009) The World’s Changing Maritime Industry and a Vision for Japan, OPRF Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rehmatulla N (2011) Applying systems thinking approach for qualitative analysis of GHG emissions regulations in shipping. In: 1st International Conference on Maritime and Maritime Affairs, Plymouth, UK

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ronen D (1982) The effect of oil price on the optimal speed of ships. J Oper Res 33(11):1035–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saldanha JP, Tyworth JE, Swan P, Russel D (2009) Cutting logistics costs with ocean carrier selection. J Bus Logist 30(2):172–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith TWP, Parker S, Rehmatulla N (2011) On the speed of ships

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stopford M (2009) Maritime economics, 3rd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter is based on work undertaken for the ongoing project “Low Carbon Shipping—a Systems Approach”, the authors would like to thank RCUK Energy, Rolls Royce and Lloyd’s Register who have funded the research, as well as the academic, industry, NGO and government members of the consortium that support the research with in-kind effort and data. The chapter uses many ideas that have been developed with colleagues at the UCL Energy Institute, including Mark Barrett, Sophie Parker, Eoin O’Keeffe and Nishatabbas Rehmatulla.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UCL Energy Institute, Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, WC1H 0NN, UK

    T. W. P. Smith

Authors
  1. T. W. P. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. W. P. Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. George St 75, Oxford, OX1 2BQ, UK

    Oliver Inderwildi

  2. 75 George Street, Oxford, OX1 2BQ, UK

    Sir David King

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, T.W.P. (2012). Low Carbon Ships and Shipping. In: Inderwildi, O., King, S. (eds) Energy, Transport, & the Environment. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2717-8_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2717-8_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2716-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2717-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation