The Condition of Complexity

Chapter
Part of the Decision Engineering book series (DECENGIN)

Abstract

This Chapter goes into depth with “The condition of complexity”. The focus is on the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann and his voluminous work on social theory which often makes a surprising and overwhelming impression on a newcomer to his theory. The chapter focuses on various concepts that can help establish a theoretical basis for a closer understanding of planning as related to complexity and thereby reflected in his universal theory of social systems. This theory offers a number of theoretical findings that systemic planning (SP) can make use of for the grounding of its principles and methodology. The final part of the chapter concerns companies and organisations perceived as socio-technical systems. This presentation is based on the British management theorist Ralph Stacey and concerns different types of change and their characteristics. A basic finding in this respect is the linking of strategic decision making to open-ended change and what this implies for the possibilities and limitations as related generally to long-term planning and specifically to the outline of the SP framework.

Keywords

Systemic Planning System Thinking Autopoietic System Societal System Causal Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. von Bertalanffy L (1972) General system theory—a critical review. In: Buckley W (ed) Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist. Aldine Publishing Company, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. von Bertalanffy L (1973) General system theory—foundations, development, applications. Penguin books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Checkland P (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  4. Harste G (1992) Niklas Luhmanns konstruktion af samfundsteori. In: Jacobsen C (ed) Autopoiesis: En introduktion til Niklas Luhmanns verden af systemer. Forlaget politisk revy, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  5. Kneer G, Nassehi A (1997) Niklas Luhmann—introduktion til teorien om sociale systemer. Hans Reitzels Forlag, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  6. Leleur S (2008a) Systems science and complexity: some proposals for future development. Syst Res Behav Sci 25(1):67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leleur S (2008b) Systemic planning: principles and methodology for planning in a complex world, 2nd edn. Polyteknisk Forlag Lyngby, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  8. Leleur S (2008c) At navigere mod fremtiden: Systemisk planlægning som ide og metode. Polyteknisk Forlag Lyngby, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  9. Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  10. Moeller H-G (2006) Luhmann explained: from souls to systems. Open Court, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Prigogine I, Stengers I (1985) Den nye pagt mellem mennesket og universet: Nye veje i naturvidenskaberne. Forlaget ASK, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  12. Stacey RD (1993a) The Chaos Frontier—creative strategic control for business. Butterworth-Heinemann Limited, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Stacey RD (1993b) Managing the unknowable. Josey-Bass Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  14. Stacey RD, Griffin D, Shaw P (2000) Complexity and management—fad or radical challenge to systems thinking. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Thyssen O (1992) Forhold som forholder sig til sig selv. In: Jacobsen C (ed) Autopoiesis: En introduktion til Niklas Luhmanns verden af systemer. Forlaget politisk revy, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  16. Thyssen O (1997) Værdiledelse—om organisationer og etik. Gyldendal, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of TransportTechnical University of DenmarkKgs. LyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations