Sensory Stimulation Program



Taking care of patients recovering from coma is not easy, as current therapeutics are neither well developed nor well validated. Sensory stimulation programs are the most widely known treatment applied to severely brain-injured patients. In this chapter, we will introduce the theoretical principles underlying these programs and the studies assessing their clinical interest. We will also discuss the limitations of this treatment and consider future directions for clinical research.


  1. 1.
    Wood R. Critical analysis of the concept of sensory stimulation for patients in vegetative states. Brain Inj. 1991;5(4):401–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hummel F, Cohen L. Drivers of brain plasticity. Curr Opin Neurol. 2005;18(6):667–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Voss H, Uluc A, Dyke J, et al. Possible axonal regrowth in late recovery from the minimally conscious state. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(7):2005–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jones R, Hux K, Morton-Anderson K, Knepper L. Auditory stimulation effect on a comatose survivor of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(2):164–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ansell B, Keenan J. The Western Neuro Sensory Stimulation Profile: a tool for assessing slow-to-recover head-injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70:104–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Merabet L, Pascual-Leone A. Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(1):44–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barnes S, Finnerty G. Sensory experience and cortical rewiring. Neuroscientist. 2010;16(2):186–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diamond M. Enriching heredity. New York: The Free Press; 1988.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Renner M, Rosenzweig M. Enriched and improverished environments: effects on brain and behaviour. New York: Springer; 1987.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nithianantharajah J, Hannan J. Enriched environments, experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(9):697–709.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sale A, Berardi N, Maffei L. Enrich the environment to empower the brain. Trends Neurosci. 2009;32(4):233–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    LeWinn E, Dimancescu M. Environmental deprivation and enrichment in coma. Lancet. 1978;2:156–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blackerly WF. Intensity of rehabilitation and length of stay. Brain Inj. 1990;4(2):167–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doman G, Wilkinson R, Dimancescu M, Pelligra R. The effects of intense multi-sensory stimulation on coma arousal and recovery. Neuropsych Rehabil. 1993;3(2):203–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall M, MacDonald S, Young G. The effectiveness of directed multisensory stimulation versus non directed stimulation in comatose closed head injured patients: pilot study of a single subject design. Brain Inj. 1992;6(5):435–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lippert-Grüner M, Terhaag D. Multimodal early onset stimulation (MEOS) in rehabilitation after brain injury. Brain Inj. 2000;14(6):585–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mitchell S, Bradley V, Welch J, Britton P. Coma arousal procedure: a therapeutic intervention in the treatment of head injury. Brain Inj. 1990;4(3):273–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sisson R. Effects of auditory stimuli on comatose patients with head injury. Heart Lung. 1990;19(4):373–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tablot L, Whitaker H. Brain-injured persons in an altered state of consciousness: measures and intervention strategies. Brain Inj. 1994;8(8):689–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson S, Powell G, Elliott K, Thwaites H. Sensory stimulation in prolonged coma: four single case studies. Brain Inj. 1991;5(4):393–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilson S, Powell G, Brock D, Thwaites H. Behavioural differences between patients who emerged from vegetative state and those who did not. Brain Inj. 1996;10(7):509–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lombardi F. Sensory stimulation of brain-injured individuals in coma or vegetative state: results of a Cochrane systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:465–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kater K. Response of head-injured patients to sensory stimulation. West J Nurs Res. 1989;11:20–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2(7872):81–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Johnson D, Roethig Johnston K, Richards D. Biochemical and physiological parameters of recovery in acute severe head injury: responses to multisensory stimulation. Brain Inj. 1993;7(6):491–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davis A, Gimenez A. Cognitive-behavioral recovery in comatose patients following auditory sensory stimulation. J Neurosci Nurs. 2003;35(4):202–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Urbenjaphol P, Jitpanya C, Khaoropthu S. Effects of the sensory stimulation program on recovery in unconscious patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Nurs. 2009;41:10–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oh H, Seo W. Sensory stimulation programme to improve recovery in comatose patients. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12:394–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Giacino J, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(12):2020–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schnakers C, Majerus S, Giacino J, et al. A French validation study of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Brain Inj. 2008;22(10):786–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schnakers C, Giacino J, Kalmar K, et al. Does the FOUR score correctly diagnose the vegetative and minimally conscious states? Ann Neurol. 2006;60(6):744–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Groswasser Z, Cohen M, Blankstein E. Polytrauma associated with traumatic brain injury: incidence, nature and impact on rehabilitation outcome. Brain Inj. 1990;4:161–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physiology DepartmentInternational Vegetative State and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal UniversityHangzhou, ZhejiangChina
  2. 2.Coma Science Group, Cyclotron Research CenterUniversity of LiègeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations