Fuel Gas Clean-up and Conditioning

  • Giulia Monteleone
  • Stephen J. McPhail
  • Katia Gallucci
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)


The technologies described in the previous chapters have demonstrated technical maturity, but they would find their optimal application in a virtuous chain such as described in this book. One of the most crucial links to bind these technologies together is the fuel gas conditioning step. This means adequate clean-up for the removal of harmful contaminants resulting from the biomass or waste-derived feedstock (such as sulphur compounds, siloxanes, halides and tars) and a reforming step where heavy hydrocarbons are converted to lighter species, especially hydrogen and carbon monoxide. This yields the best possible conditions for high-efficiency generation of electric power and heat through high-temperature fuel cells. The gas cleaning and reforming technologies most applicable to the requirements of such fuel cells are reviewed and discussed in the present chapter.


Fuel Cell Anaerobic Digestion Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Sulphide Walnut Shell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Scholz WH (1993) Processes for industrial production of hydrogen and associated environmental effects. Gas Sep Purif 7(3):131–139MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dincer I (2002) Technical, environmental and exergetic aspects of hydrogen energy systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy 27(3):265–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rasi S, Veijanen A, Rintala J (2007) Trace compounds of biogas from different biogas production plants. Energy 32(8):1375–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kawase M, Mugikura Y, Izaki Y, Watanabe T (1999) Effects of H2S on the performance of MCFC. II. Behavior of sulfur in the cell. Denki Kagaku Oyobi Kogyo Butsuri Kagaku 67(4):364–371Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Twigg MV (1996) Catalyst handbook, 2nd edn. CRC Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Appleby AJ, Foulkes FR (1989) Fuel cell handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wickowska J (1995) Catalytic and adsorptive desulphurization of gases. Catal Today 24(4):405–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Persson M, Wellinger A (2008) Task 24: energy from biological conversion of organic waste, overviewGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nguyen P, Nhut JM, Edouard D, Pham C, Ledoux MJ, Pham-Huu C (2009) Fe2O3/[beta]-SiC: a new high efficient catalyst for the selective oxidation of H2S into elemental sulfur. Catal Today 141(3–4):397–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stirling D (2000) The sulfur problem: cleaning up industrial feedstocks. Springer Us/Rsc, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dewil R, Appels L, Baeyens J (2006) Energy use of biogas hampered by the presence of siloxanes. Energy Convers Manag 47(13–14):1711–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schweigkofler M, Niessner R (2001) Removal of siloxanes in biogases. J Hazard Mater 83(3):183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ajhar M, Travesset M, Yüce S, Melin T (2010) Siloxane removal from landfill and digester gas-A technology overview. Bioresour Technol 101(9):2913–2923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bamberger G, Schweiger A, Hohenwarter (2007) U Desulfurization of hot biomass product gas with regenerative adsorbents for SOFC. In: 15th european biomass conference and exhibition, Berlin, 7–11 May 2007Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trogisch S, Hoffmann J, Daza Bertrand L (2005) Operation of molten carbonate fuel cells with different biogas sources: a challenging approach for field trials. J Power Sources 145(2):632–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morita H, Yoshiba F, Woudstra N, Hemmes K, Spliethoff H (2004) Feasibility study of wood biomass gasification/molten carbonate fuel cell power system–comparative characterization of fuel cell and gas turbine systems. J Power Sources 138(1–2):31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Farooque M (2007) International workshop on fuel cell degradation issues. Fuel cell energy, creteGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Biomass gasification Tar and particles in product gases: sampling and analysis (2006) European Committee for Standardization.
  19. 19.
    Basu P (2006) Combustion and gasification in fluidized beds. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dayton D (2002) A review of the literature on catalytic biomass tar destruction. vol NREL/TP-510-32815, US DOE NREL, GoldenGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Courson C, Makaga E, Petit C, Kiennemann A (2000) Development of Ni catalysts for gas production from biomass gasification. Reactivity in steam-and dry-reforming. Catal Today 63(2–4):427–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Swierczynski D, Libs S, Courson C, Kiennemann A (2007) Steam reforming of tar from a biomass gasification process over Ni/olivine catalyst using toluene as a model compound. Appl Catal B: Environ 74(3–4):211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bain RL, Dayton DC, Carpenter DL, Czernik SR, Feik CJ, French RJ, Magrini-Bair KA, Phillips SD (2005) Evaluation of catalyst deactivation during catalytic steam reforming of biomass-derived syngas. Ind Eng Chem Res 44(21):7945–7956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pfeifer C, Rauch R, Hofbauer H (2004) In-bed catalytic tar reduction in a dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasifier. Ind Eng Chem Res 43(7):1634–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Delgado J, Aznar MP, Corella J (1997) Biomass gasification with steam in fluidized bed: effectiveness of CaO, MgO, and CaO- MgO for hot raw gas cleaning. Ind Eng Chem Res 36(5):1535–1543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rapagnà S, Jand N, Kiennemann A, Foscolo PU (2000) Steam-gasification of biomass in a fluidised-bed of olivine particles. Biomass Bioenergy 19(3):187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ising M, Gil J, Unger C (2001) Gasification of biomass in a circulating fluidized bed with special respect to tar reduction. In: 1st world conference on biomass for energy and industry, James and James Science Pub. Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Toledo JM, Corella J, Molina G (2006) Catalytic hot gas cleaning with monoliths in biomass gasification in fluidized beds. 4. Performance of an advanced, second-generation, two-layers-based monolithic reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 45(4):1389–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Foscolo PU, Gallucci K (2008) Integration of particulate abatement, removal of trace elements and tar reforming in one biomass steam gasification reactor yielding high purity syngas for efficient CHP and power plants. In: Valencia S (ed) 16th european biomass conference and exhibitionGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nacken M, Ma L, Engelen K, Heidenreich S, Baron GV (2007) Development of a tar reforming catalyst for integration in a ceramic filter element and use in hot gas cleaning. Ind Eng Chem Res 46(7):1945–1951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rapagnà S, Gallucci K, Di Marcello M, Matt M, Nacken M, Heidenreich S, Foscolo PU (2010) Gas cleaning, gas conditioning and tar abatement by means of a catalytic filter candle in a biomass fluidized-bed gasifier. Bioresour Technol 101:7134–7141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ma L, Verelst H, Baron GV (2005) Integrated high temperature gas cleaning: Tar removal in biomass gasification with a catalytic filter. Catal Today 105(3–4):729–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    De Diego LF, Abad A, García-Labiano F, Adanez J, Gayán P (2004) Simultaneous calcination and sulfidation of calcium-based sorbents. Ind Eng Chem Res 43(13):3261–3269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hu Y, Watanabe M, Aida C, Horio M (2006) Capture of H2S by limestone under calcination conditions in a high-pressure fluidized-bed reactor. Chem Eng Sci 61(6):1854–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zeng Y, Kaytakoglu S, Harrison DP (2000) Reduced cerium oxide as an efficient and durable high temperature desulfurization sorbent. Chem Eng Sci 55(21):4893–4900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Patrick V, Gavalas GR, Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M, Jothimurugesan K (1989) High-temperature sulfidation-regeneration of CuO-Al2O3 sorbents. Ind Eng Chem Res 28(7):931–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wolf KJ, Müller M, Hilpert K, Singheiser L (2004) Alkali sorption in second-generation pressurized fluidized-bed combustion. Energy Fuels 18(6):1841–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Diaz-Somoano M, Martínez-Tarazona MR (2005) Retention of zinc compounds in solid sorbents during hot gas cleaning processes. Energy Fuels 19(2):442–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Elnashaie SSEH, Al-Ubaid AS, Soliman MA, Adris AM (1988) On the kinetics and reactor modelling of the stream reforming of methane: a review. J Eng Sci 14(2):247–273Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tsang SC, Claridge JB, Green MLH (1995) Recent advances in the conversion of methane to synthesis gas. Catal Today 23(1):3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pena MA, Gomez JP, Fierro JLG (1996) New catalytic routes for syngas and hydrogen production. Appl Catal A: Gen 144(1–2):7–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rostrup-Nielsen JR, Sehested J, Nørskov JK (2002) Hydrogen and synthesis gas by steam- and CO2 reforming. Adv Catal 47:65–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bradford MCJ, Vannice MA (1999) CO2 reforming of CH4. Catal Rev: Sci Eng 41(1):1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    York APE, Xiao T, Green MLH (2003) Brief overview of the partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas. Top Catal 22(3):345–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ferreira-Aparicio P, Benito M, Sanz J (2005) New trends in reforming technologies: from hydrogen industrial plants to multifuel microreformers. Catal Rev 47(4):491–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ogden JM (2001) Review of small stationary reformers for hydrogen production. Report to the International Energy AgencyGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ashrafi M, Pro T ll, Pfeifer C, Hofbauer H (2008) Experimental study of model biogas catalytic steam reforming: 1. Thermodynamic optimization. Energy Fuels 22(6):4182–4189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership (2009) Hydrogen Production Roadmap. Technology pathways to the futureGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited  2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giulia Monteleone
    • 1
  • Stephen J. McPhail
    • 1
  • Katia Gallucci
    • 2
  1. 1.ENEA—Italian National Agency for New TechnologiesEnergy and Sustainable Economic Development, C.R. CasacciaRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and MaterialsUniversity of L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations